RESUMO
Este estudio evaluó la retención de conocimientos, de estudiantes de pregrado expuestos a una actividad educativa de detección de lesiones de caries. Estudiantes de Odontología de los últimos años fueron invitados a participar del estudio. Ellos recibieron la capacitación 1 año y medio antes. Para evaluar su retención de conocimientos se realizaron evaluaciones teóricas y prácticas para dimensionar los conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes de los estudiantes. Cada prueba se valoró entre 0 a 10. Análisis de regresión multinivel se usaron para ver la asociación entre el desempeño de los estudiantes y su percepción sobre la importancia de la actividad. Otras peculiaridades relacionadas al desempeño en temas específicos y diferentes tipos de evaluación también fueron estudiadas. 302 estudiantes fueron evaluados. En promedio, los estudiantes tuvieron una nota 6.68 para la teórica y 5.5 para la práctica, con desviación estándar de 1.88 y de 2.27, respectivamente. La percepción de los estudiantes sobre la actividad didáctica fue asociada a su desempeño. En la evaluación teórica, los estudiantes fueron peores al relacionar la condición clínica con la histológica (21% de aciertos) y al justificar su conducta frente a lesiones inactivas (36% de aciertos). En la evaluación práctica, el 70-90% de los estudiantes demostraron tener capacidad para detectar, valorar la actividad y tomar decisiones clínicas sobre lesiones iniciales y severas. Solo 50% detectó correctamente lesiones moderadas y 32% sabe su manejo. Concluimos que la retención de conocimientos de los alumnos en mediano plazo es moderada está dentro de lo esperado.
Este estudo avaliou a retenção de conhecimento, em médio prazo, de graduandos expostos a uma atividade educativa de detecção de cárie. Esta é uma parte do estudo multicêntrico IuSTC. Alunos dos últimos anos foram convidados a participar e passaram pela atividade. Foram avaliados quanto à retenção do conhecimento após 1,5 ano. Avaliações teóricas e práticas (pontuadas de 0 a 10) foram preparadas para avaliar conhecimento, habilidades e atitudes. Os escores foram definidos como desfechos. Análises de regressão multinível testaram a associação entre a performance dos alunos e sua percepção sobre a importância da atividade dentro do seu currículo. Particularidades relacionadas à performance em tópicos específicos e diferentes tipos de avaliação também foram explorados. 302 alunos participaram das avaliações. Em média, os alunos tiveram medias (desvio-padrão (DP), de 6,68 (1,88) teórica e 5,5 (2,27) prática. A percepção dos alunos esteve associada com sua performance. Na avaliação teórica, os alunos tiveram pior performance ao relacionar a condição clínica com a histológica (21% de acertos) ou em justificar a conduta frente a lesões inativas (36% de acertos). Na avaliação prática, 70-90% dos alunos demonstraram habilidade de detectar, avaliar atividade e tomar decisões clínicas frente a lesões iniciais e severas, enquanto 50% avaliaram adequadamente as lesões moderadas e apenas 32% demonstrou atitude correta do manejo. Em conclusão, a retenção do conhecimento dos alunos está dentro do esperado em uma análise de médio prazo. Para alguns tópicos (por exemplo, relacionados a prática e justificativa de atitudes), a performance dos alunos tende a ser pior.
This study aimed to evaluate undergraduate students' medium-term knowledge retention after a learning activity related to caries lesions detection. This study is part of the IuSTC multicenter study. Last-years dental students were invited to participate and were exposed to the teaching activity. Their knowledge retention after 1.5 year was assessed. Theoretical and practical tests (scored 0 to 10) were prepared to evaluate knowledge, abilities and attitudes The scores were set as outcomes. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess the association between students' performance and his/her perception about the importance of such learning activity in curriculum. Particularities related to students' performance in specific topics and types of evaluations were also explored. 302 students participated. On average, students achieved 6.68 (SD=1.88) in theoretical and 5.5 (SD=2.27) in practical assessment. Student's perception was associated with their performance. In theoretical test, students performed worse (21% of correct answers) in linking clinical and histological condition or justifying clinical decision-making for inactive lesions (36% of correct answers). In the practical test, 70-90% demonstrated ability to detect, assess activity and make the decision about management of initial or severe lesions, while 50% of students could assess adequately moderate caries lesions and only 32% demonstrated correct attitude related to their management. Undergraduate students' knowledge retention related to the detection of caries lesions is moderate in a medium-term analysis. It is noted that for some topics (e.g. not related to practice/justification of attitudes), the students' performance tends to be worse.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudantes de Odontologia , Análise de Regressão , Cárie Dentária , Conhecimento , Tutoria , AprendizagemRESUMO
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of dental caries on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of preschool children. Methods: A literature search was undertaken through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and TRIP databases to verify available studies about the topic. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the bias risk. Global meta-analysis was carried out comparing means and standard deviations of the OHRQoL overall score from preschool children with and without caries. Subgroup analysis was conducted using different cutoff points for caries: decayed, missing, or filled teeth (dmft) greater than or equal to one and greater than or equal to six. Results: From 597 potentially eligible studies, 63 were selected for full-text analysis and 29 were included in the review: 12 for quantitative analysis and 17 for qualitative analysis. Most studies were conducted in Brazil; Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) was the instrument used in most studies to evaluate OHRQoL. A dmft index at least of one was sufficient to negatively impact the OHRQoL of preschool children, although a higher cutoff point for caries augmented the difference between groups. Bias risk was low. Conclusions: Caries might be associated with negative impact on the oral health-related quality of life of preschool children, and this association tends to increase as the disease severity worsens.
