RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this research is to evaluate the results of arthroscopic suture fixation with fiber wires used as treatment for ACL avulsion fracture, and to determine how effective such a technique is when it comes to restoring of knee function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study involves 28 patients, who underwent arthroscopic fixation of displaced ACL avulsion fractures at Saint Paul Hospital (Hanoi) from January 2014 to March 2018. RESULTS: The first three weeks were not marked with any abnormalities associated with post-operative sutures and hematomas, infectious complications were not detected either. Post-operative displacement of fracture fragments did not take place among the patients involved in the study. At the 3-month follow-up, the average IKDC score was 90.7 (range: 76-100), and the average Lysholm score was 93.6 (range 82-100). The percentage of excellent scores was 42.9% (12 patients), good scores accounted for 50% (14 patients), while fair/poor scores accounted for 3.6% each (1 patient on each score). The percentage of excellent/good scores was 92.9% in total. CONCLUSION: This study shows that ACL avulsion fracture can be treated effectively by arthroscopic suture fixation with fiber wires. In fact, this technique may restore knee function and stability.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is crucial to restrain the posterior translation of the tibia. Its anatomical structure is complex. A proper understanding of PCL anatomy may assist surgeon in reconstructing anatomically native PCL. AIM: To describe the anatomical numerical measurement of the PCL in Vietnamese adults. METHODS: Twenty-one fresh cadaveric knees were examined. The macroscopic details of the intra-articular PCL, the attachment of the anterolateral bundle (ALB), posteromedial bundles (PMB) to the femur and tibia were analysed. We used a digital camera to photograph the cadaveric specimens and used the ImageJ software to analyse the collected images. RESULTS: The ALB and PMB length were 35.5 ± 2.78 and 32.6 ± 2.28 mm, respectively. The smallest and the biggest diameter of middle third of the PCL were 5.9 ± 0.71 and 10.0 ± 1.39 mm, respectively. The area of cross section of middle third of the PCL was 53.6 ± 12.37 mm2. The femoral insertion area of ALB and PMB were 88.4 ± 16.89 and 43.5 ± 8.83 mm2, respectively. The distance from the central point of femoral ALB, PMB, and total PCL insertion to the Blumensaat line were 5.5 ± 0.91, 11.5 ± 1.98, and 7.6 ± 1.42 mm, respectively. The shortest distance from medial femoral cartilage rim to the central point of femoral ALB, PMB, and total PCL insertion were 7.0 ± 0.79, 7.3 ± 0.95, and 7.8 ± 1.73 mm, respectively. The tibial insertion area of ALB and PMB were 84.5 ± 12.52 and 47.8 ± 6.20 mm2 respectively. The shortest distance from the posterior cartilage corner of the medial tibial plateau to the central point of ALB, PMB, and total PCL insertion to tibia were 8.5 ± 1.02, 9.4 ± 1.11, and 8.3 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. The central point of tibial PCL insertion was 9.7±1.08 mm below cartilage plane of the medial tibial plateau. CONCLUSION: This study describes the detailed anatomical measurement of the PCL and its bundles in adults.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is a potentially catastrophic complication of C1-lateral mass (C1-LM) or C1-C2 transarticular screw insertion. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the risk of injury to the ICA during placement of these screws using computed tomography angiography (CTA). STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic analysis using CTA. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred sixty CTAs were examined, for a total of 320 ICAs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. METHODS: Fine-cut intravenous CTAs with multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstruction were reviewed. The position of the ICA in relation to the anterior cortex (AC) of C1, anterior end of the anterior tubercle (AT), and medial margin of the transverse foramen (TF) was measured bilaterally in three ascending and equidistant levels of the C1-AT. RESULTS: The position of the ICA in relation to C1 was variable. The average distance between the ICA and the AC of C1 was only 3.7 mm. Furthermore, 96% of the time the posterior margin of the ICA was located posterior to the anteriormost aspect of the anterior C1 tubercle (average distance, 5.4 mm), making the ICA vulnerable to damage if a drill, tap, or screw was inserted to the depth of the anteriormost portion of the AT as seen on a lateral fluoroscopic or radiographic view. The medial margin of the ICA was located medial to the TF (a location potentially vulnerable to injury with bicortical screw placement) less often at the caudal aspect of the C1-AT (54%) than at its middle or cranial aspect (74% and 75%, respectively). No ICAs were located anterior to the medial 30% of the C1-LM or more medially. CONCLUSIONS: Bicortical C1-LM or C1-C2 transarticular screw placement carries a potential risk of ICA injury. Given the wide variation in ICA location relative to C1, if bicortical C1 fixation is required, preoperative CTA should be considered to determine the optimal screw trajectory. In general, inferomedially angulated C1-LM screws appear to be safer with respect to the ICA injury than other potential trajectories.
