Left ventricular assist device-associated infections: incidence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-associated infections are major complications that can lead to critical outcomes. The aims of this study were to assess the incidence of and to determine the risk factors for LVAD-associated infections. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients undergoing LVAD implantation between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2019, in a single institution. Infection-related data were retrospectively collected by review of patient's medical files. LVAD-associated infections were classified into three categories: percutaneous driveline infections, pocket infections and pump and/or cannula infections. RESULTS: We enrolled 72 patients. Twenty-one (29.2%) patients presented a total of 32 LVAD-associated infections. Eight (38.1%) patients had more than one infection. Five (62.5%) pocket infections and one (50.0%) pump and/or cannula infection were preceded by a driveline infection. The median delay between the operation and LVAD-associated infection was 6.5 (1.4-12.4) months. The probability of having a LVAD-associated infection at one year after receiving an implant was 26.6% (95% CI: 17.5-40.5%). Percutaneous driveline infections represented 68.7% of all LVAD-associated infections. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the predominant bacteria in LVAD-associated infections (53.1% and 15.6%, respectively). Hospital length of stay (sdHR =1.22 per 10 days; P=0.001) and postoperative hemodialysis (sdHR =0.17; P=0.004) were statistically associated with infection. Colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria was more frequent in patients with LVAD-associated infections than in others patients (42.9% vs. 15.7%; P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: LVAD-associated infections remain an important complication and are mostly represented by percutaneous driveline infections. Gram-positive cocci are the main pathogens isolated in microbiological samples. Patients with LVAD-associated infections are more frequently colonized with multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Uncommon Etiology Cardiomyopathy.

The impact of uncommon etiology cardiomyopathies on Left-ventricular assist device (LVAD)-recipient outcomes is not very well known. This study aimed to characterize patients with uncommon cardiomyopathy etiologies and examine the outcomes between uncommon and ischemic/idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. This observational study was conducted in 19 centers between 2006 and 2016. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with uncommon etiology were compared to patients with idiopathic dilated/ischemic cardiomyopathies. Among 652 LVAD-recipients included, a total of 590 (90.5%) patients were classified as ischemic/idiopathic and 62 (9.5%) patients were classified in the "uncommon etiologies" group. Main uncommon etiologies were: hypertrophic (n = 12(19%)); cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) (n = 12(19%)); myocarditis (n = 11(18%)); valvulopathy (n = 9(15%)) and others (n = 18(29%)). Patients with uncommon etiologies were significantly younger with more female and presented less co-morbidities. Additionally, patients with uncommon cardiomyopathies were less implanted as destination therapy compared with ischemic/idiopathic group (29% vs 38.8%). During a follow-up period of 9.1 months, both groups experienced similar survival. However, subgroup of hypertrophic/valvular cardiomyopathies and CTRCD had significantly higher mortality compared to the ischemic/idiopathic or myocarditis/others cardiomyopathies. Conversely, patients with myocarditis/others etiologies experienced a better survival. Indeed, the 12-months survival in the myocarditis/others; ischemic/idiopathic and hypertrophic/CTRCD/valvulopathy group were 77%; 65%, and 46% respectively. In conclusion, LVAD-recipients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease and CTRCD experienced the higher mortality rate.

Effect of open-lung vs conventional perioperative ventilation strategies on postoperative pulmonary complications after on-pump cardiac surgery: the PROVECS randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy prevents postoperative pulmonary complications after elective on-pump cardiac surgery. METHODS: In a pragmatic, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial, we assigned patients planned for on-pump cardiac surgery to either a conventional ventilation strategy with no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and lower perioperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (2 cm H2O) or an open-lung ventilation strategy that included maintaining ventilation during CPB along with perioperative recruitment maneuvers and higher PEEP levels (8 cm H2O). All study patients were ventilated with low-tidal volumes before and after CPB (6 to 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight). The primary end point was a composite of pulmonary complications occurring within the first 7 postoperative days. RESULTS: Among 493 randomized patients, 488 completed the study (mean age, 65.7 years; 360 (73.7%) men; 230 (47.1%) underwent isolated valve surgery). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 133 of 243 patients (54.7%) assigned to open-lung ventilation and in 145 of 245 patients (59.2%) assigned to conventional ventilation (p = 0.32). Open-lung ventilation did not significantly reduce the use of high-flow nasal oxygenotherapy (8.6% vs 9.4%; p = 0.77), non-invasive ventilation (13.2% vs 15.5%; p = 0.46) or new invasive mechanical ventilation (0.8% vs 2.4%, p = 0.28). Mean alive ICU-free days at postoperative day 7 was 4.4 ± 1.3 days in the open-lung group vs 4.3 ± 1.3 days in the conventional group (mean difference, 0.1 ± 0.1 day, p = 0.51). Extra-pulmonary complications and adverse events did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A perioperative open-lung ventilation including ventilation during CPB does not reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as compared with usual care. This finding does not support the use of such a strategy in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866578. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02866578.

Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early haemodynamic status after aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) has been reported to impact early haemodynamic status and early mortality after prosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of PMM on early haemodynamic status after AVR using vasoactive-inotropic dependency index (VDI), postoperative pressures and end-organ perfusion. METHODS: A total of 183 patients with AS were included in this prospective cohort study, and underwent elective AVR with or without combined coronary artery bypass graft surgery. PPM was defined as a projected indexed effective orifice area of ≤0.85 cm2/m2, and was present in 27.9% of the patients. The primary end-point was the VDI [VDI = vasoactive-inotropic score/mean arterial pressure] measured upon admission to the intensive care unit (POD0) and on the morning of the first postoperative day (POD1). The secondary end-points were the following: mean left atrial pressure, mean central venous pressure, fluid balance, brain natriuretic peptide, troponin I, glomerular filtration rate and lactate levels on POD0 and POD1. RESULTS: No significant differences in VDI were observed between the no PPM and PPM groups on POD0 (0.08 ± 0.48 vs 0.05 ± 0.13, respectively, P = 0.622) or on POD1 (0.09 ± 0.40 vs 0.06 ± 0.13, respectively; P = 0.583). The mean arterial pressure, mean left atrial pressure, central venous pressure, troponin I, glomerular filtration rate and lactate levels did not differ between the two groups on POD0 and POD1, as well as fluid balance and brain natriuretic peptide on POD1. CONCLUSIONS: PPM is not associated with early haemodynamic status impairment and end-organ perfusion after AVR. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699673.

Expanding the indication for sutureless aortic valve replacement to patients with mitral disease.

OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the setting of concomitant mitral valve (MV) surgery and discuss the technical considerations. METHODS: Between January 2012 and March 2013, 10 patients underwent sutureless AVR with the Perceval prosthesis in the setting of concomitant mitral disease. Five patients underwent MV repair, 4 underwent MV replacement, and 1 had a previously implanted mechanical mitral prosthesis. RESULTS: The median age was 79 years and 7 patients (70%) were male. Median logistic EuroSCORE II was 6.2%. All valves were successfully implanted with no 30-day mortality. There was no residual aortic paravalvular leak. Two patients had from third-degree atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. At a mean follow-up of 8±4 months (range, 2-16 months), the overall survival was 80% with 2 non-valve-related deaths and the mean transaortic gradient and aortic valve area had improved to 11.1±4.6 mm Hg and 1.5±0.3 cm2, respectively. There was no evidence of mitral dysfunction in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, sutureless AVR in the setting of concomitant mitral surgery is a feasible and reproducible procedure. Elderly patients undergoing multiple valve surgery present a higher operative risk, therefore extending the indication for sutureless AVR to patients with concomitant mitral disease could greatly benefit this specific population.

The prothrombotic paradox of severe obesity after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is suggested to reduce postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) but perioperative hemostasis variations have not been studied. Therefore, we investigated the effects of severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥35kg/m(2)) on chest tube output (CTO) and hemostasis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively investigated 2799 consecutive patients who underwent coronary and/or valve surgery using CPB between 2008 and 2012. 204 patients (7.3%) presented a severe obesity. RESULTS: In the severe obesity group, the 6-h and 24-h CTO were significantly reduced by -21.8% and -14.8% respectively (P<0.0001) compared with the control group. A significant reduction of the mean number of red blood cell units transfused at 24h was observed in the severe obesity groups (P=0.01). On admission to the intensive care unit, a significant increase of platelet count (+9.2%; P<0.0001), fibrinogen level (+12.2%; P<0.0001) and prothrombin time (+4.1%; P<0.01) and a significant decrease of the activated partial thromboplastin time (-4.2%; P<0.01) were observed in the severe obesity group compared with the control group. In multivariate analysis, severe obesity was significantly associated to a decreased risk of excessive bleeding (24-h CTO >90th percentile; Odds ratio: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.82). No significant differences were observed regarding postoperative thromboembolic events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Severe obesity is associated with a prothrombotic postoperative state that leads to a reduction of postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.