Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ital J Pediatr ; 46(1): 101, 2020 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703304

RESUMO

In the pediatric setting, management of pain in the emergency department - and even in common care - is a challenging exercise, due to the complexity of the pediatric patient, poor specific training of many physicians, and scant resources.A joint effort of several Italian societies involved in pediatrics or in pain management has led to the definition of the PIPER group and the COPPER project. By applying a modified Delphi method, the COPPER project resulted in the definition of 10 fundamental statements. These may represent the basis for improving the correct management of children pain in the emergency department.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Manejo da Dor , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/etiologia , Criança , Consenso , Humanos , Itália , Sociedades Científicas
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 34(4): 618-24, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27050908

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined treatment of mud-bath therapy and glucosamine crystalline sulfate (GlcN-S) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: This study was a randomised, controlled, crossover investigation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by the investigators to two groups, named group 1 and 2. Group 1 included twenty-three patients receiving oral GlcN-S treatment from the beginning of the study (T0) to the end of the 3rd month of treatment (T3) and a combined treatment of both mud-bath therapy and GlcN-S from T3 to the end of the study at six months (T6). Group 2 included twenty-two patients receiving a combined treatment of both mud-bath therapy and GlcN-S from T0 to T3 and that discontinued mud-bath therapy, receiving GlcN-S treatment alone, from T3 to T6. Primary endpoints of the study consisted of evaluating OA severity and activity at baseline and at follow-up visits. RESULTS: All 45 patients, eligible for the study, completed the period of the crossover. In group 1, no significant difference was shown in the comparison from T0 to T3, while from T3 to T6 most variables were significantly improved. In group 2, instead, the comparison between T0 and T3 showed a significant difference in different parameters. When comparing T3 and T6, despite an improvement of all the variables, no significant difference was shown. CONCLUSIONS: The association of GlcN-S and mud-bath therapy has a positive and safe role in improving pain, function and quality of life in knee OA patients.


Assuntos
Artralgia/terapia , Glucosamina/administração & dosagem , Articulação do Joelho/efeitos dos fármacos , Peloterapia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Administração Oral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/fisiopatologia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Terapia Combinada , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico , Osteoartrite do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...