European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Management of lesions detected in colorectal cancer screening.

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on management of lesions detected in colorectal cancer screening includes 32 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of the screening process, including multi-disciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease.

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis.

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on quality assurance in endoscopy includes 50 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of endoscopy and other elements in the screening process, including multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease.

Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: To summarize the published literature on assessment of appropriateness of colonoscopy for surveillance after polypectomy and after curative-intent resection of colorectal cancer (CRC), and report appropriateness criteria developed by an expert panel, the 2008 European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, EPAGE II. METHODS: A systematic search of guidelines, systematic reviews and primary studies regarding the evaluation and management of surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy and after resection of CRC was performed. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was applied to develop appropriateness criteria for colonoscopy for these conditions. RESULTS: Most CRCs arise from adenomatous polyps. The characteristics of removed polyps, especially the distinction between low-risk adenomas (1 or 2, small [< 1 cm], tubular, no high-grade dysplasia) vs. high-risk adenomas (large [> or = 1 cm], multiple [> 3], high-grade dysplasia or villous features), have an impact on advanced adenoma recurrence. Most guidelines recommend a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy for high-risk adenomas and a 5-year colonoscopy for low-risk adenomas. Despite the lack of evidence to support or refute any survival benefit for follow-up colonoscopy after curative-intent CRC resection, surveillance colonoscopy is recommended by most guidelines. The timing of the first surveillance colonoscopy differs. The expert panel considered that 56 % of the clinical indications for colonoscopy for surveillance after polypectomy were appropriate. For surveillance after CRC resection, it considered colonoscopy appropriate 1 year after resection. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is recommended as a first-choice procedure for surveillance after polypectomy by all published guidelines and by the EPAGE II criteria. Despite the limitations of the published studies, colonoscopy is also recommended by most of the guidelines and by EPAGE II criteria for surveillance after curative-intent CRC resection.

Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.

BACKGROUND: Examining the current practice is important for the benchmarking of quality of colonoscopy and the comparison with the standards and recommendations expected by professional societies. AIM: To describe colonoscopy practice in Italy, on the basis of prospective analysis of a large number of examinations performed by operators with different levels of expertise in a wide range of unselected centres. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional, prospective and multicentre study. METHODS: The main features of each endoscopy centre (structure indicators) were collected through the use of a standardised questionnaire. A second questionnaire was used to prospectively record details of all the consecutive colonoscopies performed in a 2-week study period. RESULTS: Data from 278 centres and 12,835 consecutive colonoscopies were evaluated. Centres were uniformly distributed throughout Italy - north, centre and south - as was their organizational complexity and workload. Overall, adequate facilities (i.e. cleaning area for disinfection/reprocessing, equipped recovery room), and safety equipment (i.e. pulse oximetry, equipment for emergency cardiopulmonary resuscitation) were lacking in a considerable amount of centres, especially in those with a lower degree of organizational complexity. Written informed consent was routinely required in 87% of the centres, but a specific consent for colonoscopy, including detailed information on adverse events, was adopted by 66%. Regular programs for recording some quality indicators (i.e. cecal intubation, quality of bowel cleansing, patients' satisfaction and complications) were implemented in a minority of centres. About 93% of the colonoscopies were performed for diagnostic purpose; screening and surveillance accounted for 13.7% and 25.3% of the indications, respectively. Sedation and/or analgesia was administered in about half of the patients. Overall, colonoscopies were completed to the cecum in 80.7% of cases, and only 22.1% of the centres reported a cecal intubation rate >or=90%; this figure was reported in 33.1% of centres with high-organizational complexity and in 14.4% of outpatient units. The overall incidence of immediate complications was low (2 perforations, 26 bleedings and 32 serious cardiorespiratory complications). CONCLUSIONS: This study documented a wide variation in colonoscopy practice between centres and highlighted problem areas where interventions are needed to improve performance and safety of the examinations.

Reprocessing in digestive endoscopy units in Lombardy: results of a regional survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Inadequate disinfection of endoscopes and associated instrumentation can result in transmission of infections to patients. The aim of this study is to assess cleaning and disinfection practice in gastrointestinal endoscopy units in public and private institutions in the Lombardy region. METHODS: We drafted a questionnaire which we e-mailed to all gastrointestinal centers in Lombardy. RESULTS: A total of 79 centers responded (77%). All endoscopy units perform manual cleaning before disinfection. Automated endoscope reprocessors are available in 84.4% of the centers. Glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants are the most common employed (67% of centers). The time of exposure to the disinfectant is of 10 min in only 9.8% of the centers. The majority of endoscopy units modify their disinfection procedures in the case of infectious disease patients. In 59% of centers disposable material is only used once. In 37% of the endoscopy units instruments are dried with propanol. CONCLUSIONS: The data collected suggest that cleaning and disinfection practices have improved in recent years, and that there is a good compliance with standard guidelines. There is still room for improvement in equipment, disinfection protocols, and traceability of instruments in order to improve safety for patients and staff.

Prospective multicenter quality assessment of endotherapy of biliary stones: does center volume matter?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: To study the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment for biliary stones in a large case list of patients treated in units with different experience and different workloads in a region of northern Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 700 patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or sphincterotomy, in 14 units (> or < 200 examinations/year), for their first treatment of biliary stones. The difficulty of the examinations, the results in terms of clearance of the stones, and the late outcomes (24 months) were recorded. A questionnaire (GHAA-9modified) was administered 24 hours and 30 days after the procedure to measure patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were six units with a heavy workload and eight with a light schedule. There were 176 (25.1 %) difficult examinations (Schutz grades 3, 4, and 5). Stones were found in 580 (82.9 %) and were cleared in 504 of these patients (86.9 %). No differences were observed in the clearance of stones for the different groups of difficulty and high- and low-volume centers. Over the 24-month follow-up period, 96 patients (13.7 %) complained of recurrent symptoms and 44 (6.3 %) had proof of stones. In all, 603 questionnaires were evaluable and more than 80 % of patients expressed satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of biliary stones. However, the number of patients with symptoms (13.7) after 24 months, with or without persistence of stones, was not insignificant. It is feasible to record patient satisfaction, and in this series patients stated they were satisfied. Criticism mostly concerned pain control and explanations provided before the examination.

Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) is recommended by professional societies as part of every colonoscopy program, but little is known with regard to its effectiveness for colonoscopy outcomes. We prospectively assessed whether the implementation of a CQI program in routine clinical practice influences the quality performance of colonoscopy. METHODS: In an open-access endoscopy unit at a secondary care center in Northern Italy, 6-monthly audit cycles were carried out over a 4-year period, to identify reasons for poor colonoscopy outcomes and institute appropriate changes to improve performance. The colonoscopy completion rate and the polyp detection rate as detected by endoscopists were considered to be key measures for improvement. RESULTS: The initial crude colonoscopy completion rate was 84.6%, with a range for individual endoscopists 80.4%-94%. Four endoscopists had a completion rate lower than 90%. The overall polyp detection rate was 34%, with a wide variation among endoscopists (range 14%-42%). Poor patient tolerance and differences in colonoscopist expertise were the main determinants of lack of completion and variation in polyp detection rate. Changes to sedation practice, greater access to endoscopy sessions for the endoscopists with the lowest performance rates, and other organizational arrangements, were implemented to improve quality performance. The crude completion rates improved consistently, up to 93.1%, over the study period. This trend was confirmed even when adjusted completion rates were calculated. All endoscopists reached a crude completion rate of 90% or more and a polyp detection rate of over 20%. The introduction of CQI did not significantly change the overall incidence of procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of colonoscopy can be improved by implementing a CQI program in routine colonoscopy practice.

Segmental colitis associated with diverticula: a 7-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: We performed a long-term follow-up study of patients with segmental colitis associated with diverticula, in order to clarify the natural history of this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 15 patients who were diagnosed as having segmental colitis associated with diverticula during 1997. We assessed these patients by means of periodic follow-up visits from 1997 to 2004. RESULTS: Eight of the 15 patients had no clinical recurrence during follow-up. Five patients had sporadic recurrences that were clinically mild (on average, one in 5 years), which responded to topical therapy and often to self-medication. Only two patients were diagnosed during the follow-up period as having Crohn's disease; notably, these were the only patients who did not have hematochezia as the main symptom at onset. CONCLUSION: The course of this disease appears to be substantially benign.

Is the supine position as safe and effective as the prone position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is usually performed with the patient lying in the prone position, on the assumption that this position is optimal for cannulation of the papilla and for obtaining good-quality radiographic images. The supine position, however, may be more comfortable for the patient and may facilitate airway management, and this study aimed to compare the two positions in terms of procedure outcome, safety, and patient tolerance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who were undergoing ERCP were randomized to start the procedure in either the prone position or the supine position. Patients under the age of 18 years, intubated patients, and those who had already undergone endoscopic sphincterotomy were excluded. The difficulty of cannulation was assessed using the Freeman score (1=one to five attempts; 2=six to 15 attempts; 3=more than 15 attempts; 4=failure of cannulation). Total procedure time, patient tolerance, willingness to undergo ERCP in the future, and procedure-related adverse cardiorespiratory events (oxygen desaturation, tachycardia, bradycardia) were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were evaluated (21 men, 13 women; mean age 68, range 20-96), 17 patients in each group. Demographic and clinical features, and the indications for the procedure were similar for the two patient groups. The median Freeman score was significantly lower in the prone group compared with the supine group (1 vs. 3, P=0.0047, rank sum test). Biliary cannulation was achieved in all patients in the prone group, but was not achieved in five patients (29%) in the supine group (P=0.052). In four of these five patients, biliary cannulation was successfully achieved after turning the patient into the prone position. The percentage of patients unwilling to repeat the ERCP procedure in the future was higher in the supine group (29% vs. 6%, P=0.087); the mean tolerance score and mean total procedure time were similar in the two groups. Seven patients in the supine group experienced at least one adverse cardiorespiratory event, compared with only one patient in the prone group (41% vs. 6%, P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP performed with the patient in the supine position is technically more demanding for operators used to working with patients in the prone position and carries a greater risk of adverse cardiorespiratory events in nonintubated patients.

Increased prevalence of migraine in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia referred for open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The association between gastrointestinal symptoms and headache is frequently unrecognized. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of migraine in dyspeptic outpatients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18 - 55 years undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for dyspeptic symptoms in three endoscopic units were recruited consecutively. All of the patients were given a validated questionnaire on headache symptoms in order to determine the prevalence of migraine. Patients were divided into four groups (ulcer-like dyspepsia, reflux-like dyspepsia, dysmotility-like dyspepsia, only nausea and/or vomiting). Age-matched blood donors were given the same questionnaires and served as controls. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients (mean age 40 +/- 11, 52 % men) and 310 controls (mean age 39 +/- 11, 56 % men) were enrolled. No differences were observed between the two groups in the prevalence of migraine (15 % vs. 11 %; P = 0.12). A higher prevalence of migraine was found among women in both groups (P < 0.006). In patients with reflux-like and ulcer-like dyspepsia, the prevalence of migraine did not differ from that in the control individuals (8 % and 7 %, respectively), whereas a higher prevalence of migraine was noted in patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia (23 %; P < 0.02 vs. controls, those with ulcer-like dyspepsia and those with reflux-like dyspepsia) and in patients with nausea and/or vomiting alone (53 %; P < 0.002 vs. all other groups). The multivariate analysis confirmed that the symptom pattern and sex were the only variables independently associated with migraine. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of migraine should be considered in young patients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy due to nausea and/or vomiting or for dysmotility-like dyspepsia.

Ischemic colitis associated with rofecoxib.

Rofecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of osteoarthritis and management of acute pain. Recent debate has emerged regarding the prothrombotic potential and the cardiovascular safety of this new drug, especially at doses greater than 25mg. We describe two extensively investigated cases of self-limited ischemic colitis in patients who were briefly treated with 50mg rofecoxib daily for acute pain. In both cases, the onset of symptoms correlated temporally with rofecoxib use and symptoms abated with drug discontinuation. There was no evidence of other possible causes of colon ischemia. A causal relationship between the start of rofecoxib treatment and the colon ischemia cannot be definitely established on the basis of the evidence, but the temporal relationship is striking and the pathophysiological rationale could be founded.

Viral clearance in HCV viraemic patients with normal alanine aminotransferase after combination therapy: a controlled, open-labelled study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels, liver fibrosis has been reported in 0-22% of cases and advanced liver disease in 5-10% of cases. AIM: To determine whether patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels clear infection after anti-viral therapy at equal or different rates from infected patients with raised alanine aminotransferase levels. METHODS: Thirty-five hepatitis C virus RNA-positive patients with fibrosis at liver histology (Group 1) were matched for genotype, sex, age and histology with patients with raised alanine aminotransferase levels (Group 2). Both groups were treated with 3 MU interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg) for 12 months. RESULTS: End-of-therapy response was achieved in 71.4%[95% confidence interval (CI), 56.4-86.3] of patients in Group 1 and in 52.3% (95% CI, 42.8-61.9) of those in Group 2 (P = 0.04). At week 72, 22 patients (62.8%; 95% CI, 46.8-78.1) in Group 1 and 50 patients (47.5%; 95% CI, 38.0-57.1) in Group 2 showed a sustained virological response (P = 0.11). Non-1 genotype was the only independent predictor of sustained response (P = 0.002), with an odds ratio of 3.45 (95% CI, 1.58-7.50). At month 3 of therapy, the positive predictive values for non-response were 100% and 96% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interferon and ribavirin induce comparable sustained virological response in patients with persistently normal or raised alanine aminotransferase levels. Stage 1 fibrosis, rather than alanine aminotransferase levels, may be the criterion on which to decide whether or not to treat patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels.

Virtual colonoscopy.

Computed axial colonography, usually called virtual colonoscopy, is a new diagnostic method potentially useful for investigating polyps and tumors of the colon and rectum. It uses spiral axial tomography data to build up images similar to those given by conventional colonoscopy, offering advantages in that it causes no adverse reactions, and is accepted well by patients, who do not need to be sedated. Reports to date show its sensitivity and specificity vary in identifying polyps in the colon, and there are still many problems with the new method, such as its cost, its learning curve, the identification of flat lesions, and detection of extracolonic abnormalities. There is a pressing need to establish the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of virtual colonoscopy as a screening method for colorectal tumors, and for post-polypectomy surveillance.

A multi-centre North Italian prospective survey on some quality parameters in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To record prospectively, in a multi-centre survey, the adherence to some quality parameters of lower digestive endoscopy in everyday practice, focusing in particular on sedation and monitoring; choice of extension of endoscopic examination by the operator and relative performance in intubation of the caecum; behaviour, in some particular clinical circumstances, such as fresh haematochezia, screening and surveillance situations, functional symptoms, management of polyps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five centres located in Lombardia, Italy took part in the study; the duration of the survey was 2 weeks. 1,406 consecutive cases were recorded. RESULTS: The main indications to colonoscopy were fresh haematochezia (21%). abdominal pain (11.7%) and surveillance after surgery for tumours or endoscopic polyp removal (24.3%). Screening examinations accounted for 7.1% of all examinations. Conscious sedation was administered in 63.9% of patients; pulse oxymetry and cardiac frequency monitoring was used in 44.2% of cases. Total colonoscopy was planned in 84.2% of cases; the actual rate of intubation of the caecum in the cases submitted to the procedure was 84.1%. Normal results were obtained in 24.3%. In 24.3% of patients, one or more polyps were identified; 84.2% of these were removed during the first examination. Four complications (accounting for 0.28% of cases) were recorded, all after polypectomy and all successfully treated conservetively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has shown that some attitudes in lower digestive endoscopy are sub-optimal: in particular, screening examinations are still infrequent; conscious sedation and monitoring have probably been used too rarely; intubation of the caecum was achieved in <90% of cases; the endoscopic removal of many polyps has been delayed for unexplained reasons. On the other hand, timing of surveillance after surgery for tumours or endoscopic removal of polyps has, overall, been adequate; the rate of normal examinations and the rate of complications have been satisfactorily low.

Routine versus "on demand" sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The safety and tolerance of routine sedation and analgesia versus "on demand" sedation were compared in patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine outpatients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group A (n = 125) received midazolam, 0.07 mg/kg intravenously plus meperidine, 0.77 mg/kg intravenously immediately preceding the colonoscope insertion. Group B (n = 124) received the same medication upon request during the procedure. Tolerance was assessed 24 hours later by phone interview performed by a nurse blinded to the medication regimen administered. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (66%) in Group B required sedation during colonoscopy. Among men in Group B more than 60 years of age, only 23% required sedation. The proportion of patients reporting moderate or severe pain (34% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001) and of those stating they would not be willing to undergo colonoscopy again in the future (22% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.005) was significantly higher in the "on demand" sedation group. By multivariate analysis the randomization group was the single variable independently associated with both such outcomes. The frequency of side effects was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of sedative and analgesic drugs routinely before colonoscopy is superior to "on demand" sedation in terms of tolerance and is not associated with an increase in side effects.

Diagnostic yield of open access colonoscopy according to appropriateness.

BACKGROUND: Open-access endoscopy allows physicians to directly schedule endoscopic procedures for their patients without prior consultation. Evaluation of both appropriateness and diagnostic yield of endoscopic procedures is critical when assessing the costs and benefits of endoscopy in an open-access setting. The aim of this study was to assess the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open-access system and to establish the yield of diagnostic information relevant to patient care. METHODS: Overall, 1123 consecutive patients referred for open-access colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled in the study. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines were used to assess the relationship between the appropriate use of colonoscopy and the presence of relevant endoscopic findings. RESULTS: The rate of colonoscopies "generally not indicated" according to ASGE guidelines was 29% (39% for primary care physicians and 23% for specialists; p < 0.0001). A relevant endoscopic finding was detected in 338 examinations (35%). The diagnostic yield was significantly higher for "generally indicated" colonoscopies (43%) compared with "generally not indicated" procedures (16%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of inappropriate use of colonoscopy was high, open-access colonoscopy was effective in detecting neoplastic lesions. Because most of these were detected during examinations performed for appropriate indications, the appropriateness of the indication emerges as crucial to the cost-effectiveness of an open-access system.