Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Plant Microbe Interact ; 36(9): 558-571, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36998121

RESUMO

Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) (genus Nepovirus, family Secoviridae) causes fanleaf degeneration, one of the most damaging viral diseases of grapevines. Despite substantial advances at deciphering GFLV-host interactions, how this virus overcomes the host antiviral pathways of RNA silencing is poorly understood. In this study, we identified viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) encoded by GFLV, using fluorescence assays, and tested their capacity at modifying host gene expression in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein gene (EGFP). Results revealed that GFLV RNA1-encoded protein 1A, for which a function had yet to be assigned, and protein 1BHel, a putative helicase, reverse systemic RNA silencing either individually or as a fused form (1ABHel) predicted as an intermediary product of RNA1 polyprotein proteolytic processing. The GFLV VSRs differentially altered the expression of plant host genes involved in RNA silencing, as shown by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. In a co-infiltration assay with an EGFP hairpin construct, protein 1A upregulated NbDCL2, NbDCL4, and NbRDR6, and proteins 1BHel and 1A+1BHel upregulated NbDCL2, NbDCL4, NbAGO1, NbAGO2, and NbRDR6, while protein 1ABHel upregulated NbAGO1 and NbRDR6. In a reversal of systemic silencing assay, protein 1A upregulated NbDCL2 and NbAGO2 and protein 1ABHel upregulated NbDCL2, NbDCL4, and NbAGO1. This is the first report of VSRs encoded by a nepovirus RNA1 and of two VSRs that act either individually or as a predicted fused form to counteract the systemic antiviral host defense, suggesting that GFLV might devise a unique counterdefense strategy to interfere with various steps of the plant antiviral RNA silencing pathways during infection. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.


Assuntos
Nepovirus , Nepovirus/genética , Interferência de RNA , Antivirais , RNA Viral/genética , Doenças das Plantas
2.
Pest Manag Sci ; 78(11): 4841-4849, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35908181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Insecticides are essential, though controversial tools in modern pest management. Insecticides can slow the spread of key vector-borne plant pathogens, but often lead to inconsistent results given that insecticide use is generally focused on acute toxicity under no-choice conditions. Here, we analysed the lethal (survival) and sublethal (feeding behaviour) effects of six commercial products (acetamiprid, deltamethrin, spinosad, sulfoxaflor, pyrethrin and kaolin) on Philaenus spumarius, vector of the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa. Furthermore, we assessed the impact of insecticides displaying different degrees of acute toxicity against spittlebugs (highest to lowest: acetamiprid, pyrethrin and kaolin) on the transmission of X. fastidiosa by P. spumarius under both free-choice and no-choice conditions. RESULTS: Deltamethrin, acetamiprid and to a limited extent pyrethrin significantly altered the feeding behaviour of P. spumarius. Deltamethrin and acetamiprid were highly toxic against P. spumarius, but the mortality induced by exposure to pyrethrin was limited overall. By contrast, spinosad, sulfoxaflor and kaolin did not significantly impact P. spumarius feeding behaviour or survival. Under no-choice conditions, both pyrethrin and acetamiprid reduced the X. fastidiosa inoculation rate compared with kaolin and the control. On the other hand, pyrethrin reduced transmission, but acetamiprid failed to significantly affect bacterial inoculation under free-choice conditions. CONCLUSION: Pyrethrin was the only compound able to reduce X. fastidiosa transmission under both free-choice and no-choice conditions. Xylella fastidiosa management strategy based exclusively on the evaluation of insecticide acute toxicity under no-choice conditions would most likely fail to prevent, or slow, bacterial spread. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.


Assuntos
Hemípteros , Inseticidas , Piretrinas , Animais , Comportamento Alimentar , Hemípteros/microbiologia , Inseticidas/farmacologia , Caulim , Nitrilas , Doenças das Plantas/microbiologia , Doenças das Plantas/prevenção & controle , Piridinas , Compostos de Enxofre , Xylella
3.
PLoS One ; 9(6): e99446, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24911029

RESUMO

Nepoviral infections induce recovery in fully expanded leaves but persist in shoot apical meristem (SAM) by a largely unknown mechanism. The dynamics of infection of a grapevine isolate of Artichoke Italian latent virus (AILV-V, genus Nepovirus) in tobacco plants, including colonization of SAM, symptom induction and subsequent recovery of mature leaves from symptoms, were characterized. AILV-V moved from the inoculated leaves systemically and invaded SAM in 7 days post-inoculation (dpi), remaining detectable in SAM at least up to 40 dpi. The new top leaves recovered from viral symptoms earliest at 21 dpi. Accumulation of viral RNA to a threshold level was required to trigger the overexpression of RDR6 and DCL4. Consequently, accumulation of viral RNA decreased in the systemically infected leaves, reaching the lowest concentration in the 3rd and 4th leaves at 23 dpi, which was concomitant with recovery of the younger, upper leaves from disease symptoms. No evidence of virus replication was found in the recovered leaves, but they contained infectious virus particles and were protected against re-inoculation with AILV-V. In this study we also showed that AILV-V did not suppress initiation or maintenance of RNA silencing in transgenic plants, but was able to interfere with the cell-to-cell movement of the RNA silencing signal. Our results suggest that AILV-V entrance in SAM and activation of RNA silencing may be distinct processes since the latter is triggered in fully expanded leaves by the accumulation of viral RNA above a threshold level rather than by virus entrance in SAM.


Assuntos
Nicotiana/virologia , Doenças das Plantas/virologia , Vírus de Plantas/fisiologia , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação da Expressão Gênica de Plantas , Inativação Gênica , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno/genética , Estágios do Ciclo de Vida , Meristema/virologia , Fenótipo , Doenças das Plantas/genética , Folhas de Planta/virologia , Interferência de RNA , RNA Viral/genética , Nicotiana/genética , Transcriptoma , Replicação Viral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...