A Multicenter Study of Clinical Presentations and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma in Pakistan: The Real-World Analysis in a Resource-Constrained Country.

This is the first multicenter study from Pakistan exploring the prevalence, clinical presentations and treatment outcomes of Multiple Myeloma patients. This retrospective study involved data collection from hospital record system of four tertiary care referral hospitals of Pakistan including all patients diagnosed as having Multiple Myeloma from January 2014 to December 2018. The demographic details, clinical presentations, laboratory findings, treatment responses, and mortalities were evaluated. The progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed considering relapse and mortality as the end points, respectively. For the progression-free survival, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log rank test were used to compare the survival function for chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as opposed to chemotherapy alone (non-ASCT). The overall survival analysis was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. This study identified 403 Multiple Myeloma patients in five years. The median age at presentation was 55 years. Bortezomib based drug regimens were the most commonly used initial treatments (57.5%). Forty three patients received ASCT. The progression-free survival median for ASCT and non-ASCT patients were 50 months (95% CI, 42-57.9 months) and 26 months (95% CI, 21.5-30.5 months), respectively. The cumulative probability of survival rate at 60 months was 80%. This study identified 403 Multiple Myeloma patients over 5 years in four tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan. It underscores the importance of autologous stem cell transplant in Myeloma patients and advocates improving its facilities in Pakistan.

Outcomes of Philadelphia Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescent and Young Adults.

Background Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) accounts for 25% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) age subgroup. It is associated with poor outcomes and is considered a standard indication for allogeneic stem cell transplant (Allo-SCT). Improved outcomes have been reported with addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to chemotherapy in children and the role of Allo-SCT is now being debated in the first remission. Complete response (CR) at three months is associated with improved survival even without Allo-SCT in first CR. In this study, we have analyzed disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and factors affecting survival outcomes of Ph+ ALL in the AYA subgroup, in resource-limited settings treated with chemotherapy and TKIs. Materials and methods This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of Ph+ ALL AYA patients, aged 18-40 years, and registered between January 2015 and December 2020. Primary objectives are to calculate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives are to identify prognostic factors affecting response rates and outcomes. List of cases was obtained from hospital information system (HIS) and data were collected from patient case notes and electronic medical records. Data analysis was done utilizing the SPSS statistical program (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results Forty-nine patients were identified with Ph+ ALL with a median age of 23 years (range: 18-40 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 2.5:1. None of the patients had central nervous system (CNS) disease. White cell count was >30,000 per mm3 in 26% of patients, while 13% had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Thirty-three percent patients received adult (hyper-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, Adriamycin, and dexamethasone {CVAD}) protocols while 67% received pediatric-inspired (Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster {BFM} 2000 or UK-ALL 2003/2011) protocols. TKI therapy was received by 66% of patients during treatment (early: 37%; late: 29%) and 34% did not receive TKIs due to financial constraints. CR after induction was achieved in 69% cases. Induction mortality was 16%. The median DFS for the entire cohort was 27 months (0.93-53.06) and the median OS was 29 months (8.89-49.10). The median OS in Allo-SCT group was not reached vs 8.0±8.8 months (p=0.05) with chemotherapy only. The OS was significantly better in patients with no additional cytogenetic abnormalities, pediatric-inspired chemotherapy protocols, early use of TKIs in induction phase, Allo-SCT, and post-Allo-SCT use of TKIs. Conclusion Addition of TKIs to pediatric-inspired chemotherapy protocols in Ph+ ALL AYA patients and Allo-SCT results in better overall survival. TKI availability remains a significant issue in low-income countries due to significant financial burden on the patients. Allo-SCT continues to be an attractive option, particularly in low-income countries providing an option for cure in Ph+ ALL.

Diagnosis and Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Society of Medical Oncology, Pakistan Society of Hematology, and Pakistan Society of Clinical Oncology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the commonest non-Hodgkin lymphoma encountered by hematopathologists and oncologists. Management guidelines for DLBCL are developed and published by countries with high income and do not cater for practical challenges faced in resource-constrained settings. This report by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from Pakistan is on behalf of three major national cancer societies: Society of Medical Oncology Pakistan, Pakistan Society of Hematology, and Pakistan Society of Clinical Oncology. The aim is to develop a practical and standardized guideline for managing DLBCL in Pakistan, keeping in view local challenges, which are similar across most of the low- and middle-income countries across the globe. Modified Delphi methodology was used to develop consensus guidelines. Guidelines questions were drafted, and meetings were convened by a steering committee to develop initial recommendations on the basis of local challenges and review of the literature. A consensus panel reviewed the initial draft recommendations and rated the guidelines on a five-point Likert scale; recommendations achieving more than 75% consensus were accepted. Resource grouping initially suggested by Breast Health Global Initiative was applied for resource stratification into basic, limited, and enhanced resource settings. The panel generated consensus ratings for 35 questions of interest and concluded that diagnosis and treatment recommendations in resource-constrained settings need to be based on available resources and management expertise.

Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A 2021 Update on Genetics, Diagnosis, and Novel Therapeutics.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma arising from thymic B-cells having clinicopathologic features distinct from systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PMBCL comprises 2% to 4% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), 7% of DLBCL and seen predominantly in young females with a median age of 35 years at diagnosis. The annual incidence of PMBCL is 0.4 per million with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 70% with improving supportive care and genetic characterization of the disease. Pathogenesis involves dysregulation of Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT), nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) pathways and amplification of the 9p24.1 region of chromosome 9. PMBCL patients have a prolonged life expectancy necessitating the need for treatment approaches that are based on maximizing cure with minimal long-term toxicity. Due to rarity and its recognition as a distinct entity, therapeutic decisions are guided by clinical presentation, clinician and center experience, and analysis of patients with PMBCL within DLBCL registries. Historically R-CHOP has been the usual first line treatment for PMBCL followed by involved site radiotherapy (ISRT), however clinical practice varies across centers with emerging consensus to avoid upfront RT by utilizing dose intense regimens (DA-EPOCH-R) in younger and fit patients. Prognosis of relapsed refractory PMBCL not responding to salvage chemotherapy is dismal, however there are many emerging options including Brentuximab Vedotin, immune check point inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. In this article, we focus on the pathogenesis, current and evolving treatments, and provide recommendations for optimal management of patients with PMBCL.

FLAG vs FLAG-IDA: outcomes in relapsed/refractory acute leukemias.

BACKGROUND: FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) and FLAG-IDA (idarubicin added to standard FLAG) are salvage chemotherapy regimens used for relapsed and refractory acute leukemias. The toxicity of the FLAG-IDA courses is generally more severe than for the FLAG courses, with marked neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. This study aims to compare the outcomes of both regimens in terms of morbidity, mortality and remission/transplant. No comparison has been reported so far in Pakistan or the rest of third world countries. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study was conducted in Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant unit after approval from Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee. 76 leukemic patients treated with salvage chemotherapy were included. Our endpoints for patient outcome analysis included disease remission/relapse, HSCT following remission, morbidity, mortality, progression free survival and overall survival. Kaplan Meier curves were made in SPSS for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included from 2015 to July 2018. 49 patients were given FLAG, and 27 were given FLAG-IDA. 31.6% in FLAG-IDA achieved complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete counts (CRi). 21% in FLAG-IDA made it to Bone marrow transplant (BMT) (67% of those in CR/CRi). 41.7% in FLAG achieved CR/CRi, and 27.8% in FLAG made it to BMT (67% of those in CR/CRi). Common complications in both regimens were infection, bleeding and other complications e.g., rash, diarrhea, mucositis, etc. A statistically significant difference was found between overall survival of the two regimens, p value 0.033. CONCLUSIONS: FLAG regimen was found superior to FLAG-IDA with better survival and subsequent transplant rate.