Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Comp Pathol ; 160: 72-78, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29729723

RESUMO

Sporotrichosis is caused by species of fungi within the Sporothrix schenckii complex that infect man and animals. In Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, an epidemic has been observed since 1998, with most of the cases being related to transmission from infected cats. Although the definitive diagnosis of feline sporotrichosis is made by fungal culture, cytopathological and histopathological examinations are used routinely, because the long culture period may delay treatment onset. However, alternative methods are desirable in cases of low fungal burden. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been described as a sensitive method for diagnosing human and canine sporotrichosis, but there are no reports of its application to cats. The aim of this study was to analyse the sensitivity of cytopathological examination (Quick Panoptic method), histopathology (Grocott silver stain) and anti-Sporothrix IHC by blinded comparisons, using fungal culture as the reference standard. Samples were collected from 184 cats with sporotrichosis that exhibited skin ulcers. The sensitivities of Grocott silver stain, cytopathological examination and IHC were 91.3%, 87.0% and 88.6%, respectively. Grocott silver stain showed the best performance. IHC showed high sensitivity, as did cytopathological examination and these may be considered as alternative methodologies. When the three methods were combined, the diagnosis was established in 180 (97.8%) out of 184 cases. Taken together, these findings indicate the need to implement these methods as routine tools for the early diagnosis of sporotrichosis in cats, notably when fungal culture is not available.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Esporotricose/veterinária , Animais , Gatos , Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoce , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Coloração e Rotulagem/métodos
2.
J Comp Pathol ; 154(2-3): 157-60, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26852343

RESUMO

Parasitological methods are the most specific procedures used for the diagnosis of Leishmania spp. infection, but their limited sensitivity poses a disadvantage and prompts the need for alternatives. The choice of site for sample collection influences diagnostic sensitivity. The combination of an accurate diagnostic method and a technique that allows large-scale field studies is highly desirable to enhance the investigation of Leishmania spp. infection in dogs, especially in endemic regions. The bone marrow is a good target for the detection of Leishmania spp. in dogs. In this context, bone marrow aspiration is rapid and less invasive compared with biopsy procedures, and also enables cell block processing, paraffin wax embedding and the sectioning of samples for further histological and immunohistochemical analyses. The aim of this study was to describe for the first time parasitological methods (immunohistochemistry [IHC] and histopathology) using the cell block technique with bone marrow aspirates for the diagnosis of Leishmania spp. infection in dogs. Bone marrow aspiration was performed in 45 dogs from an area endemic for visceral leishmaniosis for parasitological culture and the cell block technique (histopathology and IHC). Fourteen (31.1%) dogs tested positive for Leishmania spp. by IHC, six (13.3%) by parasitological culture and four (8.9%) by histopathology. Cell block IHC was a useful tool for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniosis. Further studies should be conducted to validate this method for routine epidemiological screening.


Assuntos
Medula Óssea/parasitologia , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Leishmaniose Visceral/veterinária , Animais , Biópsia por Agulha , Medula Óssea/patologia , Cães , Leishmania infantum , Leishmaniose Visceral/diagnóstico
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 167(4): 837-46, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22950597

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) and sporotrichosis exhibit similar histopathology and low frequencies of microorganism detection. OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to identify microscopic alterations that can distinguish between these diseases. METHODS: Haematoxylin and eosin stained slides of 171 ATL and 97 sporotrichosis samples from active cutaneous lesions were examined for histopathological alterations. The lesions were diagnosed by isolating the agent (which was not visible) in culture. An intuitive diagnosis was assigned to each slide. The strength of the association between the histopathological findings and the diagnosis was estimated by an odds ratio, and each finding was graded according to a regression model. A score was assigned to each sample based on the histopathological findings. A study of the interobserver reliability was performed by calculating kappa coefficients of the histopathological findings and intuitive diagnoses. RESULTS: The markers 'macrophage concentration', 'tuberculoid granuloma' and 'extracellular matrix degeneration' were associated with ATL. 'Suppurative granuloma', 'stellate granuloma', 'different types of giant cells', 'granulomas in granulation tissue' and 'abscess outside the granuloma' were associated with a diagnosis of sporotrichosis. 'Macrophage concentration' and 'suppurative granuloma' had the highest (substantial and almost perfect, respectively) reliability. The regression model score indicated 92.0% accuracy. The intuitive diagnosis had 82.5% diagnostic accuracy and substantial reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the clinical and epidemiological context, some histopathological alterations might be useful for the differential diagnosis between ATL and sporotrichosis cutaneous lesions in cases in which the aetiological agent is not visible.


Assuntos
Dermatomicoses/diagnóstico , Leishmaniose Cutânea/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias Parasitárias/diagnóstico , Esporotricose/diagnóstico , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Granuloma/patologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Macrófagos/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Coloração e Rotulagem
4.
J Comp Pathol ; 143(1): 1-7, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20100620

RESUMO

Pyogranulomatous lesions from 80 dogs with sporotrichosis and 26 dogs with American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) were compared microscopically in order to identify features that would support the diagnostic suspicion and direct the subsequent search for the aetiological agent of either infection. Odds ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated in order to evaluate the impact of the microscopical findings on the diagnosis of either disease. Lesions with well-formed granulomata were 14 times more likely to be due to sporotrichosis than ATL. Marked neutrophil infiltration into granulomata was 12.26 times more likely to be associated with sporotrichosis when compared with lesions having mild neutrophilic infiltration. Absence of lymphocytes and macrophages in the peripheral infiltrate was associated with a 9.71 and 4.93 higher chance, respectively, of being sporotrichosis rather than ATL compared with lesions where these cells were present. Lesions with a perivascular, perifollicular and interstitial peripheral inflammatory infiltrate were 5.48 times more likely to be due to sporotrichosis than ATL when compared with lesions with a diffuse peripheral infiltrate. Histopathological analysis may therefore contribute to the diagnosis of sporotrichosis or ATL skin lesions in dogs since this method permits the identification of features that direct the diagnostic suspicion, thus facilitating the search for the aetiological agent in histological sections, permitting the precise request of subsequent tests and thereby reducing costs and time taken to achieve a definitive diagnosis and the initiation of appropriate therapy.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/patologia , Leishmaniose Cutânea/veterinária , Pele/patologia , Esporotricose/veterinária , Animais , Brasil , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Doenças do Cão/imunologia , Cães , Granuloma/imunologia , Granuloma/patologia , Inflamação/imunologia , Inflamação/patologia , Leishmaniose Cutânea/imunologia , Leishmaniose Cutânea/patologia , Macrófagos/imunologia , Macrófagos/patologia , Infiltração de Neutrófilos/imunologia , Razão de Chances , Pele/imunologia , Esporotricose/imunologia , Esporotricose/patologia
5.
Mycopathologia ; 168(2): 79-87, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19360480

RESUMO

The present study reports the histopathological findings of 86 skin lesions of dogs with sporotrichosis from Rio de Janeiro. Suppurative granulomatous inflammation was the predominant finding and was observed in 76 (88.37%) cases. Plasma cells surrounding the suppurative granulomas were detected in 68 (89.5%) cases and an inflammatory infiltrate at the periphery of these granulomatous lesions was observed in 63 (82.9%). Fungus-specific staining revealed yeast cells compatible with Sporothrix schenckii in 36 cases. These fungal elements were only detected in lesions characterized by suppurative granulomatous inflammation. Thus, specific staining of serial sections is recommended in the case of dogs with skin lesions whose histopathological presentation is consistent with sporotrichosis. However, due to the generally small number of yeast cells in lesions, the hypothesis of sporotrichosis should not be ruled out even if the result is negative, especially in epidemic areas where correlation with epidemiological data is particularly useful.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/microbiologia , Doenças do Cão/patologia , Sporothrix/isolamento & purificação , Esporotricose/veterinária , Animais , Brasil , Cães , Granuloma/patologia , Inflamação/patologia , Pele/patologia , Esporotricose/diagnóstico , Esporotricose/microbiologia , Esporotricose/patologia , Supuração/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...