RESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: Mutations in DICER1 are found in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and in multinodular goiter (MNG) at a younger age with other tumors, which characterizes DICER1 syndrome. DICER1 is one driver to DTC; however, it is also found in benign nodules. We speculated that patients with mutations in DICER1 may present long-lasting MNG. Our aim was to investigate the frequency of DICER1 variants in patients with MNG. Subjects and methods: Patients who submitted to total thyroidectomy due to large MNG with symptoms were evaluated. DICER1 hotspots were sequenced from thyroid nodule samples. To confirm somatic mutation, DNA from peripheral blood was also analyzed. Results: Among 715 patients, 154 were evaluated with 56.2 ± 12.3 years old (28-79) and the thyroid volume was 115.7 ± 108 mL (16.2-730). We found 11% with six DICER1 variations in a homo or heterozygous state. Only rs12018992 was a somatic DICER1 variant. All remaining variants were synonymous and likely benign, according to the ClinVar database. The rs12018992 was previously described in an adolescent with DTC, measuring 13 mm. There were no significant differences according to gender, familial history of goiter, age, thyroid volume, TSH and TI-RADS classification between DICER1 carriers. Free T4 were lower in patients with DICER1 polymorphisms (13.77 ± 1.8 vs. 15.44 ± 2.4 pmol/L, p = 0.008), regardless of TSH levels. Conclusions: We conclude that germline DICER1 variants can be found in 11% of large goiters but no second-hit somatic mutation was found. DICER1 is one driver to thyroid lesion and a second-hit event seems unnecessary in the MNG development.
RESUMO
Yellow fever (YF) is a vaccine-preventable disease, but live attenuated YF vaccine (YFV) is contraindicated in immunosuppressed patients due to the risk of life-threatening YFV-associated side effects. This study aimed to evaluate 1. the knowledge of renal transplant recipients (RTRs) about the contraindication and risks of YFV; 2. the prevalence of inadvertent vaccination of RTRs against YF; and 3. the outcome of these patients. A cross-sectional telephone contact study was conducted with 200 RTRs selected from the outpatient clinic of our transplantation unit. There were 116 successful telephone contacts (58%). A total of 11 vaccinated patients were identified: 5 received YFV in the pretransplant period and 6 in the post-transplant period. All patients received the full dose of the vaccine. Among those vaccinated after transplant, only 1 reported a mild adverse event (nausea) after receiving the vaccine. All vaccinated patients who were post-transplant did not know about vaccine contraindications as a result of their clinical condition. Among the unvaccinated patients, this rate was 12.4%. YFV is the main tool for disease prevention and control as there is no specific antiviral treatment for YF. Our results confirm the evidence that transplant recipients tolerate YFV well. However, data are not strong enough to recommend this vaccine in transplant recipients. Counseling RTRs on the contraindications of YFV is important to prevent inadvertent use of this vaccine in this population.
