Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Actas urol. esp ; 43(3): 137-142, abr. 2019. ilus, graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-181172

RESUMO

Introducción y objetivos: La incontinencia urinaria es una de las principales complicaciones tras la prostatectomía radical. El objetivo del estudio fue describir las características anatómicas, evaluadas preoperatoriamente mediante resonancia magnética, que permitan predecir la recuperación precoz de la continencia urinaria tras la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot. Material y métodos: Se analizó prospectivamente a 72 pacientes tratados mediante prostatectomía radical asistida por robot. Los resultados funcionales se evaluaron mediante los cuestionarios EPIC (1, 6 y 12 meses) y la fecha de primera continencia autoinformada. La longitud de la uretra membranosa (LUM) y el ángulo entre la LUM y el eje prostático (aLUMP) fueron evaluados preoperatoriamente en imágenes sagitales ponderadas en T2. Resultados: La tasa de continencia fue del 67,2, el 92,6 y el 95,2% a 1, 6 y 12 meses, respectivamente. Los pacientes con valores de aLUMP inferiores alcanzaron continencia urinaria temprana: al mes, los continentes habían tenido una aLUMP media de 107,21° (IC del 95% 90,3-124,6), mientras que entre los que presentaban incontinencia era de 118,5° (IC del 95% 117,7-134); p = 0,014. Hemos encontrado diferencias en el aLUMP entre los grupos según la continencia a los 6 meses: ángulo en continentes de 114,24° (IC del 95% 104,6-123,9), mientras que en los incontinentes había sido 142° (IC del 95% 126,5-157,6), p = 0,015. A los 12 meses, los continentes tenían una LUM preoperatoria significativamente superior a los incontinentes. En el análisis multivariante solamente el aLUMP fue un predictor independiente de continencia urinaria a los 6 meses OR 0,007 (IC del 95% 0,002-0,012), p = 0,012. Conclusiones: La evaluación de parámetros anatómicos preoperatorios previos a la cirugía puede ayudar a definir qué pacientes recuperarán la continencia urinaria precozmente, auxiliando a la toma de decisiones terapéuticas


Introduction and aims: Urinary incontinence is a common complication after radical prostatectomy. The aim of our study was to describe the preoperative anatomical features using magnetic resonance imaging in order to predict early continence recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: 72 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy were prospectively analysed. EPIC questionnaire (1, 6 and 12 mo) and first self-reported continence were used to assess functional outcomes. Membranous urethral length (MUL) and MUL-prostate axis angle (aMULP) were assessed preoperatively on T2 weighted sagittal images. Results: Continence rate was 67.2%, 92.6% and 95.2% at 1, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Early continence was achieved in patients with the lower aMULP. At 1 month, average aMULP in continent patients was 107.21° (CI 95% 90.3-124.6) vs. 118.5° (CI 95% 117.7-134) in incontinent ones (p = 0.014). At 6 month differences in aMULP among groups were found: 114.24° (CI 95% 104.6-123.9) in continents vs. 142° (CI 95% 126.5-157.6) in incontinents (p = 0.015). At 12 month, continent group showed a significantly higher preoperative aMULP. aMULP was revealed as the only independent predictor of urinary continence at 6 mo in multivariate analysis, OR 0.007 (CI 95% 0.002-0.012), p = 0.012. Conclusions: Preoperative anatomical parameters assessment prior surgery can help to identified those patients will achieve early continence recovery and it supports therapeutic decisions making


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Incontinência Urinária/diagnóstico , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética/instrumentação , Prognóstico , Período Pré-Operatório , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata
2.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 43(3): 137-142, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30420112

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Urinary incontinence is a common complication after radical prostatectomy. The aim of our study was to describe the preoperative anatomical features using magnetic resonance imaging in order to predict early continence recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 72 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy were prospectively analysed. EPIC questionnaire (1, 6 and 12 mo) and first self-reported continence were used to assess functional outcomes. Membranous urethral length (MUL) and MUL-prostate axis angle (aMULP) were assessed preoperatively on T2 weighted sagittal images. RESULTS: Continence rate was 67.2%, 92.6% and 95.2% at 1, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Early continence was achieved in patients with the lower aMULP. At 1 month, average aMULP in continent patients was 107.21° (IC 95% 90.3-124.6) vs. 118.5° (IC 95% 117.7-134) in incontinent ones (P=.014). At 6 month differences in aMULP among groups were found: 114.24° (IC 95% 104.6-123.9) in continents vs. 142° (IC 95% 126.5-157.6) in incontinents (P=0.015). At 12 month, continent group showed a significantly higher preoperative aMULP. aMULP was revealed as the only independent predictor of urinary continence at 6 mo in multivariate analysis, OR 0.007 (IC 95% 0.002-0.012), P=0.012. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anatomical parameters assessment prior surgery can help to identified those patients will achieve early continence recovery and it supports therapeutic decisions making.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Uretra/anatomia & histologia , Micção
3.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 44(5): 468-73, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23020963

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to identify which endograft, and to what degree of oversizing, in combination with what type of parallel stent, may result in the most adequate fit in a juxtarenal abdominal aneurysmal neck when using a parallel-stent technique. MATERIALS/METHODS: In-vitro silicon aneurysmal neck models of different diameters, with one side-branch, were constructed. Two different endografts (Medtronic-Endurant Abdominal Stent Graft and Gore-Excluder abdominal aortic aneurysm Endoprosthesis; three diameters each), and two stents (self-expanding Gore Viabahn Endoprosthesis and balloon-expandable Atrium Advanta V12; 6-mm diameter) were tested, applying three endograft-oversizing degrees (15%, 30% and 40%). After remodelling using the kissing-balloon technique at 37 °C, the 36 endograft-stent-oversizing combinations were scanned by computed tomography (CT). The size of the results in gutters, parallel-stent compression and main stent-graft infolding were recorded. RESULTS: Increasing oversizing (15%, 30% and 40%) significantly decreased gutter areas (11.5, 6.2, 4.3 mm(2), P < 0.001); nevertheless, main endograft infolding of most 40%-oversized stent grafts was detected, particularly with Excluder devices. Lower stent compression, but wider gutters, were observed with the Excluder when compared to Endurant stent grafts, and with V12 when compared to Viabahn parallel stents. The Endurant-Viabahn combination resulted in maximum stent compression (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Better endograft-stent apposition was achieved when using 30% endograft oversizing. Lower stent compression, but wider gutters, were observed with the Excluder stent-graft and V12 parallel stent, achieving maximum stent compression with the Endurant-Viabahn combination.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Stents , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Pressão , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , Fatores de Risco , Estresse Mecânico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA