Analysis of Obstetric Outcomes by Hospital Location, Volume, and Teaching Status Associated With Non-Medically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks.

Importance: Non-medically indicated induction of labor has been demonstrated to potentially improve some obstetric outcomes, such as decreasing cesarean birth. It has been reported that rates of cesarean birth and other obstetric outcomes vary among hospitals with different characteristics. Objective: To assess whether obstetric outcomes differ between nulliparous individuals with low-risk pregnancies managed with non-medically indicated induction of labor compared with expectant management in different types of hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included non-medically indicated induction of labor at 39 weeks' gestation compared with expectant management of singleton, nonanomalous, births in nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies in California between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011. The initial analysis of these data was performed in 2021. Outcomes were assessed by 3 hospital characteristics: location (urban vs rural), obstetric volume, and teaching (academic vs community) status. Volume was categorized based on the average number of births per year and grouped into low (<1200 births per year), medium (1200-2399 births per year), and high (≥2400 births per year). Births with previous or planned cesarean delivery were excluded, and non-medically indicated induction of labor was defined as induction of labor without a specific medical indication. Testing with χ2 and multivariable logistic regression analyses was used for statistical comparisons with a cutoff level of P = .01. Exposure: Non-medically indicated induction of labor at 39 weeks' gestation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was cesarean birth, and numerous secondary perinatal outcomes were also assessed. Results: There were 455 044 births included in this study. When stratified by hospital variables, a number of sociodemographic characteristics were significantly different, such as race and ethnicity, age, body mass index, and insurance type. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of cesarean birth were significantly lower in all settings with induction of labor except for low-volume hospitals, in which there was no significant difference (aOR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.09). Chorioamnionitis and postpartum hemorrhage were lower with induction of labor among nearly every hospital when stratified by hospital characteristics. Neonatal outcomes were improved in all settings with induction of labor compared with expectant management. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that non-medically indicated induction of labor may be associated with a lower rate of cesarean births and some maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in a range of hospital settings.

Maternal and infant hospitalization costs associated with maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index in California, 2007-2011.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the number of pregnant women who are overweight or obese is increasing. While such individuals are at increased risk of pregnancy complications, data regarding costs associated with pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and maternal and infant outcomes are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To estimate maternal and infant costs associated with pre-pregnancy BMI in a large cohort of pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton, non-anomalous births in California from 2007 to 2011. Women with preexisting diabetes mellitus and chronic hypertension were excluded. Hospitalization costs were estimated separately for women and infants using hospital charges adjusted using a cost-to-charge ratio. These costs included hospitalization costs for admission for delivery only. We estimated the differences in median costs between seven categories of pre-pregnancy BMIs, including underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9), class I obesity (BMI 30.0-34.9), class II obesity (BMI 35.0-39.9), class III obesity (BMI 40.0-49.9) and obesity with BMI ≥50.0. We also performed stratified analyses by mode of delivery and gestational age at delivery. We examined the length of stay for women and infants and estimated the gestational age at delivery. Analyses were conducted utilizing Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests with a significance cutoff of 0.05. RESULTS: In a California cohort of 1,722,840 women, 787,790 (45.7%) had a pre-pregnancy BMI that was considered overweight or obese. The median maternal and infant costs of each pre-pregnancy BMI strata were significantly different when compared to other strata, with underweight and normal weight women having the lowest median costs ($11,581 and $11,721, respectively) and the most obese category (BMI ≥50) having the highest costs ($15,808). When stratified by mode of delivery and gestational age at delivery, this remained true. Hospitalization costs for women and infants with severe maternal morbidity were also significantly different based on maternal BMI. COMMENT: The hospitalization costs associated with each strata of BMI were significantly different when compared to each other and when stratified by mode of delivery and prematurity. This analysis allows for a greater understanding of the health care costs associated with different maternal pre-pregnancy BMI classes.

Maternal and infant hospitalization costs associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a California cohort.

BACKGROUND: The United States has higher health care costs than other developed nations. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are increasingly common, and longer hospital admissions and utilization of additional therapies are costly. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate maternal and neonatal hospital costs in a large cohort of pregnant women with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women in California with singleton, non-anomalous births with gestational ages between 23-42 weeks. Women were categorized into seven mutually exclusive groups: no hypertension, chronic hypertension (HTN), chronic HTN with superimposed preeclampsia, gestational HTN, mild preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and eclampsia. Hospitalization costs were estimated for women and neonates separately and included the cost for admission for delivery only. We used Chi squared and Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests for statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: In a California cohort of 1,918,482 women, 16,208 (0.8%) had chronic HTN, 5,912 (0.3%) had chronic HTN with superimposed preeclampsia, 39,558 (2.1%) had gestational HTN, 33,462 (1.7%) had mild preeclampsia, 17,184 (0.9%) had severe preeclampsia and 1252 (0.1%) had eclampsia. Median hospitalization costs and length-of-stays were statistically significantly different for women in each group (p<.001). Women with eclampsia had the highest median hospitalization costs ($25,437, IQR: $16,893-$37,261) and women without any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy had the lowest ($11,720, IQR: $8019-$17,530). Costs were significantly different between groups based on gestational age and mode of delivery, and with severe maternal morbidity and neonatal intensive care unit admission status (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that hospitalization costs of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were significantly higher than women without hypertension in pregnancy. These results highlight the economic burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.