Regional adaptation of the education in palliative and end-of-life Care Pediatrics (EPEC-Pediatrics) curriculum in Eurasia.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is a priority to improve pediatric hematology oncology (PHO) care in Eurasia. However, there are limited regional opportunities for PPC education. We describe the adaptation and implementation of a bilingual end-user Education in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (EPEC)-Pediatrics course for PHO clinicians in Eurasia. METHODS: Due to COVID-19, this course was delivered virtually, consisting of prerecorded, asynchronous lectures, and a bilingual workshop with interactive lectures and small group sessions. A pre-postcourse design was used to evaluate the knowledge acquisition of the participants including their knowledge alignment with World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, ideal timing of palliative care, and comfort in providing palliative care to their patients. Questions were mostly quantitative with multiple choice or Likert scale options, supplemented by free-text responses. RESULTS: A total of 44 (76%) participants from 14 countries completed all components of the course including pre- and postcourse assessments. Participant alignment with WHO guidance improved from 75% in the pre- to 90% in the postcourse assessments (p < 0.001). After participation, 93% felt more confident controlling the suffering of children at the end of life, 91% felt more confident in prescribing opioids and managing pain, and 98% better understood how to hold difficult conversations with patients and families. Most participants (98%) stated that they will change their clinical practice based on the skills and knowledge gained in this course. CONCLUSIONS: We present a successful regional adaptation of the EPEC-Pediatrics curriculum, including novel delivery of course content via a virtual bilingual format. This course resulted in significant improvement in participant attitudes and knowledge of PPC along with an understanding of the ideal timing of palliative care consultation and comfort in providing PPC to children with cancer. We plan to incorporate participant feedback to improve the course and repeat it annually to improve access to high-quality palliative care education for PHO clinicians in Eurasia.

Translating Research to Action: The Development of a Pediatric Palliative Cancer Care Advocacy Tool in Eurasia.

PURPOSE: The Assessing Doctors' Attitudes on Palliative Treatment study was conducted in 11 Eurasian countries to assess physician knowledge of and structural barriers to integration of palliative care into pediatric oncology. After publication, regional collaborators identified the need to disseminate country-specific study results locally and provide policy recommendations to inform stakeholders. METHODS: The Assessing Doctors' Attitudes on Palliative Treatment report was developed with Eurasian and St Jude pediatric palliative care and oncology experts to summarize study findings and deliver country-level data to local stakeholders. In parallel, an assessment was developed to explore how regional collaborators intend to use the report to improve local advocacy and dissemination of research findings. The country report and assessment were translated to English, Russian, and Mongolian. RESULTS: Country-specific two-page reports display study findings on pediatric palliative care education, access to pediatric palliative care services, and barriers to and timing of integration with cancer care, alongside clinical and policy recommendations. These reports were distributed to collaborators in 11 countries. Assessment results (N = 30) demonstrated that regional collaborators planned to distribute the report to institutional and government stakeholders, aiming to increase access to pediatric palliative care services (77%), establish a community-based palliative care network (70%), and increase opportunities for specialization (70%). CONCLUSION: We describe the development of an evidence-based advocacy tool to inform local health and education policy in Eurasia. This summary report of study findings, translated to local languages and adapted to a broader audience, is currently used to advocate for greater access and quality of palliative care for children with cancer. This work may serve as the basis for future dissemination efforts of scientific research.

Comparative study of prophylaxis with high and low doses of voriconazole in children with malignancy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Children with acute myeloid leukemia and relapses of leukemia are at high risk of developing fungal infections and need antifungal prophylaxis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two different dosage regimens of voriconazole (VRC) during prophylactic administration in children with malignancy and neutropenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at the Belarusian Research Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Immunology from May 2017 to December 2019. The present study included 21 Caucasian patients with malignant hematological diseases (20 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and relapses of leukemia and 1 patient with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) aged 2-18 years. All patients were randomly divided into two groups that received different dosage regimens of VRCZ prophylaxis. Patients in the "high-dose" group received VRCZ at a dose of 9 mg/kg twice a day PO, or 8 mg/kg twice a day IV without a loading dose (children of 2-11 and adolescents and of 12-14 years old with <50 kg weight body), or a dose of 4 mg/kg twice a day PO or IV (adolescents of 12-14 years old with ≥50 kg body weight and all adolescents over 14 years old). Patients in the "low-dose" group received VRCZ at a dose of 4 mg/kg twice a day, PO or IV, without a loading dose (children of 2-11 and adolescents of 12-14 years old with <50 kg body weight), or at a dose of 3 mg/kg twice a day, PO or IV (adolescents of 12-14 years old with ≥ 50 kg body weight and all adolescents over 14 years old). When neutropenia recurred (after the next chemotherapy block), the patients were re-randomized and prophylaxis was resumed in the absence of fungal infection. Therefore, some patients (n=12, 57%) entered the study several times (maximum four times, after each chemotherapy block). In total, 21 patients experienced 40 episodes of VRCZ prophylaxis. RESULTS: In the high-dose group (n=20 episodes of prophylaxis), invasive fungal infections (IFI) signs were recorded in one (5%) case. In the low-dose group (n=20 episodes), IFI signs were observed in six (30%) cases (P=0.0375). The residual serum concentration was significantly higher in patients who received high doses of VRCZ (P<0.0001). Most patients with IFI (n=6, 86%) had a mean value (i.e., <0.74 µg/ml) of the residual serum concentration of the medication. Median of the first signs of fungal infection was 22 days from the start of prophylaxis. The dosage was the only highly significant factor that affected the metabolism of VRCZ. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of IFI was significantly lower in children who prophylactically received VRCZ in high doses (P=0.0375) and had ≥ 0.74 µg/ml residual serum concentration of the medication (P=0.0258). Residual serum concentration of VRCZ reached a plateau by day sixth of the treatment. In children, the dosage was the only highly significant factor affecting the metabolism of VRCZ.