Sleep Patterns in Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation Including Gender and Age Differences. Survey Results From One Transplantation Centre in Poland.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep plays a crucial role in maintaining health. Transplant patients are exposed to numerous stressors and are at risk of sleep disturbances. The aim of this study was to assess the sleep patterns of transplant patients. METHODS: An anonymous paper survey was carried out among patients from one transplant center in Poland. Respondents were asked about the quality and quantity of sleep and the overall impact of the transplantation on their night rest. Data were collected from June to November 2023. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 212 respondents (122 males and 90 females), aged 48.38 ± 13.68. The positive impact of transplantation on sleep hygiene was indicated by 57.4% of respondents, 28.9% observed no impact, and 13.6% rated the impact as negative. Our study showed that sleep is more satisfying in males than in females (62.8% of males and 46.7% of females). The analysis revealed that 38.9% of females need 30 minutes more than men to fall asleep. Additionally, females tend to get up half an hour later compared to men. About 71.9% of males declared good well-being the next day compared to 62.2% of females. Furthermore females declared more sleepiness the next day. The study also showed that older transplant recipients (over 50 years-of-age) report more frequent awakenings at night. CONCLUSIONS: The data collected showed differences in sleep patterns according to gender and age. Females and older patients should be screened for sleep disturbances during post-transplantation care.

Treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in a 60-year-old kidney transplant recipient. The use of phage therapy.

We would like to demonstrate the difficulty of treatment in a patient after kidney transplantation (KTX) who developed chronic urinary tract infection (UTI) with a multi-drug resistant ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. The patient underwent several treatment interventions including supportive therapy with bacteriophages. This article presents a case of a 60-year-old patient after KTX repeatedly admitted to the hospital with recurrent UTIs caused by ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae showing variable susceptibility to carbapenems and full susceptibility to colistin only. KTX was performed due to renal insufficiency caused by polycystic kidney disease. The patient experienced 12 severe episodes of UTI due to K pneumoniae within 15 months since transplantation. In an attempt to curb the ongoing infections, phage therapy (PT) was applied on the experimental basis, coordinated by the Phage Therapy Unit of the Hirszfeld Institute in Wroclaw, Poland. Eventually, the patient fully recovered following nephrectomy of his own left kidney where cysts were the suspected reservoir of bacteria. The patient completed 29 days of PT. PT caused no reported side effects in the described case of the KTX recipient, although its role in controlling chronic UTI caused by K pneumoniae is unclear. More studies are needed in the population of kidney transplant recipients.

Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Despite universal prophylaxis, late cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurs in a high proportion of kidney transplant recipients. We evaluated whether a specific viral T-cell response allows for the better identification of recipients who are at high risk of CMV infection after prophylaxis withdrawal. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 19 pretransplant anti-CMV seronegative kidney graft recipients R- (18 from seropositive donors [D+] and one from a seronegative donor [D-]) and 67 seropositive recipients R(+) (59 from seropositive donors and eight from seronegative donors) who received antiviral prophylaxis with valganciclovir. The QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay was performed within the first and third months after transplantation. Blood samples were monitored for CMV DNAemia using a commercial quantitative nucleic acid amplification test (QNAT) that was calibrated to the World Health Organization International Standard. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 86 patients (24%) developed CMV viremia after prophylaxis withdrawal within 12 months posttransplantation. In the CMV R(+) group, the QF-CMV assay yielded reactive results (QF-CMV[+]) in 51 of 67 patients (76%) compared with 7 of 19 patients (37%) in the CMV R(-) group (p = 0.001). In the CMV R(+) group, infection occurred in seven of 16 recipients (44%) who were QF-CMV(-) and eight of 51 recipients (16%) who were QF-CMV(+). In the CMV R(-) group, infection evolved in five of 12 recipients (42%) who were QF-CMV(-) and one of 7 recipients (14%) who were QF-CMV(+). No difference was found in the incidence of CMV infection stratified according to the QF-CMV results with regard to the recipients' pretransplant CMV IgG serology (p = 0.985). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 15 of 36 patients (42%) with hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) 90 days posttransplantation compared with two of 34 patients (6%) without HGG (p = 0.0004). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in seven of 13 patients (54%) with lymphocytopenia compared with 14 of 70 patients (20%) without lymphocytopenia (p = 0.015). The multivariate analysis revealed that the nonreactive QuantiFERON-CMV assay was an independent risk factor for postprophylaxis CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: In kidney transplant recipients who received posttransplantation prophylaxis, negative QF-CMV results better defined the risk of CMV infection than initial CMV IgG status after prophylaxis withdrawal. Hypogammaglobulinemia and lymphocytopenia were risk factors for CMV infection.

Severe cytomegalovirus infection in a second kidney transplant recipient treated with ganciclovir, leflunomide, and immunoglobulins, with complications including seizures, acute HCV infection, drug-induced pancytopenia, diabetes, cholangitis, and multi-organ failure with fatal outcome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegaly remains one of the most common infectious complications in organ transplant recipients, and the course of the infection may have a negative effect on survival of the transplant and recipient. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 32-year-old female patient who received a second kidney transplant from a cadaveric donor in July 2012, treated successfully with ganciclovir for primary CMV infection in August 2012 and then re-treated from November due to re-infection. The viral load at the start of re-treatment was 6 million copies. In view of ganciclovir treatment failure, Sando immunoglobulins were administered. Subsequently, when CMV viral load increased to 18 million copies, a decision was made to use combination treatment with leflunomide and ganciclovir. Immunosuppressive treatment was also modified by administering everolimus in view of its potential antiviral activity. Seizures, pancytopenia, diabetes, diarrhoea, and (probably) drug-induced liver damage and cholangitis were observed in the course of treatment. At 3 months of hospitalization, the patient was discharged home with viral load of 8000 copies. As treatment continuation, she received valganciclovir at the full therapeutic dose in view of very good kidney function (creatinine 0.7 mg/dl). The patient was re-hospitalized after 10 days due to fever and cough. Due to abnormal liver function test results and negative serum markers of viral hepatitis, HCV RNA was tested, with a positive result (above 10^8 copies). Subsequently, decline in clinical status, overhydration, increasing creatinine levels, hepatic failure signs, and renewed CMV DNA increase to 520 000 copies were observed. Despite intensive treatment, the patient died of multi-organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: The case described illustrates the difficulties in the treatment of CMV infection and its possible dramatic complications.

Early everolimus-induced pneumonitis in a renal transplant recipient: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus is a derivative of sirolimus, and is considered to be free of the latter's pulmonary toxicity. Recently, a few cases of everolimus-induced lung injury have been reported. Early recognition of drug-induced lung disease is important because it can be reversed if appropriate therapy is instituted soon after the onset of symptoms. CASE REPORT: We present the case of an everolimus-induced pneumonitis in a renal transplant recipient, which occurred as early as on the 5th day after everolimus introduction. Shortly after the transplant procedure, the patient presented with typical symptoms of pulmonary infection. Chest radiography and computed tomography showed bilateral patchy lung infiltrates with peribronchial distribution that were suggestive of bacterial pneumonia. However, there was no improvement with empiric antibiotic treatment. Repeated cultures from the blood, sputum, and broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) also were negative. Tuberculosis, Pneumocystis jiroveci, and Cytomegalovirus infections were excluded. A transbronchial lung biopsy performed 9 days after the onset of symptoms revealed mild nonspecific inflammation with a fibrotic component in the bronchial walls. Withdrawal of everolimus on the third day of hospitalization and after 8 days of its usage resulted in quick clinical recovery and resolution of radiological abnormalities within 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of drug-induced pulmonary toxicity is difficult because it is essentially a diagnosis of exclusion. Lack of response to empiric antibiotic treatment and an imaging pattern of organizing pneumonia should raise suspicion of everolimus-induced pneumonitis in patients undergoing therapy with this drug.