Does atrial fibrillation still increase the risk of death? One-year follow-up results of the NOMED-AF study.

INTRODUCTION: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well­known risk factor for ischemic stroke and hospitalization, its effect on mortality has not been clearly established. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether AF is an independent risk factor for death. A secondary objective was to evaluate the role of oral anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke and death in 1­year follow­up of patients included in the NOMED­AF (Noninvasive Monitoring for Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation) study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The NOMED­AF study included 3014 patients. The participants underwent continuous long­term electrocardiographic monitoring using a wearable vest for up to 30 days. The present analysis involved 2795 patients who completed the 1­year follow­up. The median (interquartile range) follow­up time was 365 (365-365) days. AF was diagnosed in 617 participants. RESULTS: Independent risk factors for death in the patients who completed the 1­year follow­up were AF, age equal to or above 65 years, and chronic kidney disease. The individuals with diagnosed AF had an almost 2­fold higher risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% CI, 1.18-2.44; P <0.001) and a 2.5­fold higher risk of stroke (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.41-4.44; P <0.001), as compared with those without an AF diagnosis. The participants with AF who received oral anticoagulants had an almost 5­fold lower risk of death than those who were not on anticoagulation (2.9% vs 14.2%, respectively; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AF is an independent risk factor for death and cardiovascular hospitalization. The risk of death and stroke in patients with AF is significantly higher than in the patients without this arrhythmia. Oral anticoagulation in patients with AF significantly reduces the rates of death and stroke; however, its use is suboptimal in this group of patients.

Anticoagulants versus Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Co-Morbid Thrombocytopenia.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative approach to anticoagulants. Nonetheless, data regarding the outcomes of LAAC procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia remain lacking. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of the composite endpoint comprising ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding, and cardiac cause of death among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and thrombocytopenia who were either undergoing LAAC or receiving oral anticoagulants. The secondary endpoint was the determination of total mortality. Data from a prospective, single-center registry of patients undergoing LAAC procedures were analyzed. A subset of 50 consecutive patients with thrombocytopenia were selected. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a thrombocyte count below 150,000. Subsequently, from patients hospitalized with AF receiving oral anticoagulants, 50 patients were further chosen based on propensity score matching, ensuring comparability with the study group. The primary endpoint occurred in 2% of patients in the LAAC group and 10% of patients in the non-LAAC group (p = 0.097). Additionally, a significant difference was noted in the occurrence of the secondary endpoint, which was observed in 0% of patients in the LAAC group and 10% of patients in the non-LAAC group (p = 0.025). In patients with thrombocytopenia the LAAC procedure improves prognosis compared with continued anticoagulant treatment.

Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have contraindications to oral anticoagulant medications. However, these procedures carry certain risks of peri-procedural complications. One such complication is silent brain infarcts (SBI), which can lead to cognitive impairment and mood disturbances. The implementation of mechanical neuroprotection systems during LAAC procedures may reduce the risk of SBI and associated cognitive and mood disorders. METHODS: The LAAC-SBI trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind interventional study. The study aims to enroll a total of 240 patients, with 120 patients allocated to each group. The study group will evaluate the use of the Sentinel CPS during LAAC, while the control group will undergo LAAC procedures without the Sentinel CPS. The primary endpoint of the study is the number of new SBIs or stroke foci detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI). Secondary endpoints include deterioration of cognitive function, development of dementia syndrome, and occurrence of depressive disorders. These endpoints will be assessed using questionnaire tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test (TMT), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The observational period for patients in the study is 2 years. DISCUSSION: If the study demonstrates a favorable outcome with reduced incidence of SBI and improved cognitive and mood outcomes in patients receiving cerebral protection devices during LAAC, it will have significant implications for clinical management standards. This would support the use of neuroprotection devices not only for LAAC but also in procedures such as atrial fibrillation ablation or transcatheter mitral valve interventions, where the risk of embolic events and subsequent brain injury may also be present. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05369195. Registration on 11.05.2022.

Predictive factors of left ventricular ejection fraction improvement after myocardial infarction treated invasively.

Introduction: One indication for the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator is a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%. However, in certain patients following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) a gradual improvement in LVEF has been observed. The factors determining this increase in LVEF have not been conclusively determined. Aim: To ascertain the independent predictors associated with the improvement of LVEF in patients following AMI who underwent invasive treatment, while observing their progress over a 6-month follow-up period. Material and methods: Among 665 patients with AMI, a population with LVEF ≤ 35% was selected. After 6 months, a follow-up echocardiogram was performed. Further analysis compared patients with at least 5% improvement in LVEF (Group I) with those without an increase (Group II). Results: Group I consisted of 34 individuals out of 80 patients (43%) with LVEF ≤ 35%. The factors linked to a reduced probability of LVEF improvement were: higher levels of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (OR 0.841 for 1 ng/ml increase in cTnT, CI 0.715-0.989; p = 0.037), presence of diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.217, 95% CI: 0.058-0.813, p = 0.023) and moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (OR = 0.178, 95% CI: 0.053-0.597; p = 0.005). Conclusions: The study findings indicate that the presence of severe or moderate mitral regurgitation is the most significant factor contributing to the lack of LVEF improvement following AMI. Moreover, the extent of myocardial damage, as indicated by elevated cTnT values, along with compromised adaptation to hypoxia in patients with diabetes, are identified as independent factors associated with reduced chances of an increase in LVEF.

The effectiveness of atrial fibrillation identification using noninvasive long-term electrocardiographic monitoring system (NOMED-AF TECH).

INTRODUCTION: Although it is well­known that longer electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring allows for detection of paroxysmal silent atrial fibrillation (SAF), it is still unknown how long the ECG monitoring should last to increase the probability of SAF diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to analyze ECG acquisition parameters and timing to detect SAF during the Noninvasive Monitoring for Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The protocol assumed up to 30 days of ECG telemonitoring of each participant in order to reveal AF / atrial flutter (AFL) episodes lasting at least 30 seconds. SAF was defined as AF detected and confirmed by cardiologists in asymptomatic individuals. The ECG signal analysis was based on the results of 2974 participants (98.67%). AF/AFL episodes were registered and confirmed by cardiologists in 515 individuals, that is, 75.7% of all patients (n = 680) in whom AF/AFL diagnosis was established. RESULTS: The median monitoring time to detect the first SAF episode was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1-13). Fifty percent of the patients with this type of arrhythmia were identified by 6th day (IQR, 1-13) of the monitoring, and 75% by the 13th day of the study. Paroxysmal AF was registered on average on 4th day (IQR, 1-10). CONCLUSIONS: The ECG monitoring time to detect the first episode of SAF in at least 75% of patients at risk of this arrhythmia was 14 days. Detection of 1 patient with de novo AF, SAF, or de novo SAF, required monitoring of, respectively, 17, 11, and 23 patients.

Prevalence and factors predisposing to potential drug-drug interactions in a Polish community-dwelling geriatric population: An observational, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Due to advanced age, multimorbidity and polypharmacotherapy, older patients are predisposed to drug interactions and the adverse effects of inappropriate drug combinations. OBJECTIVES: To provide up-to-date data on predisposing factors and the prevalence of possible drug interactions in the Polish geriatric population and to promote automated analysis programs as part of safe pharmacotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used the Lexicomp® Drug Interactions database to assess pharmacological interactions between active substances included in all types of preparations (prescription drugs, over-the-counter drugs, vitamins, nutritional preparations, and dietary supplements) used at least once in the 2 weeks preceding the study, among 2633 home-dwelling people aged >65 years. The variables measured included age, sex, place of residence, level of education, and multimorbidity. Post-stratification was used to weigh the sample structure against the Polish population in 2017. RESULTS: Drug interactions were identified in 81.2% of all individuals. The mean number (with 95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of all drug interactions was 4.24 (4.02-4.46), and the median value (with 1st and 3rd quartiles (Q1-Q3)) was 3 (1-6). At least 1 category C interaction was observed in 75.8% of all study participants, 24.3% had 1 or more category D interaction, and 4.3% had 1 or more category X interaction. The most important predisposing factor to drug interactions was multimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a high prevalence of potential drug interactions in the Polish geriatric population. Automated analysis systems deliver useful information on pharmacological interactions and should be promoted in the Polish healthcare community as tools to support pharmacotherapy.

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the 65 or over Polish population. Report of cross-sectional NOMED-AF study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, characterized by an increased risk of thromboembolic complications that can be markedly reduced with anticoagulation. There is a paucity of studies assessing the total prevalence of AF in national populations. AIMS: To assess the nationwide prevalence of AF in a population of adults ≥65 old and to determine the impact of duration of electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring on the number of newly detected AF episodes. METHODS: The NOMED-AF study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT: 0324347) was a cross-sectional study performed on a nationally representative random sample of 3014 Polish citizens 65 years or older. Final estimates were adjusted to the national population. All participants underwent up to 30 days of continuous ECG monitoring. Total AF prevalence was diagnosed based on the patient's medical records or the presence of AF in ECG monitoring. RESULTS: The prevalence of AF in the Polish population ≥65 years was estimated as 19.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9%-20.6%). This included 4.1% (95% CI, 3.5%-4.8%) newly diagnosed cases and 15.1% (95% CI, 13.9%-16.3%) previously diagnosed cases and consisted of 10.8% (95% CI, 9.8%-11.9%) paroxysmal AF and 8.4% (95% CI, 7.5%-9.4%) persistent/permanent AF. The incidence of all paroxysmal AF events as a function of ECG monitoring duration increased from 1.9% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.6%) at 24 hours to 6.2% (95% CI, 5.3%-7.2%) at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AF in elderly adults is higher than estimated based on medical records only. Four weeks of monitoring compared to 24-hour ECG Holter allow detection of 7-fold more cases of previously undiagnosed paroxysmal AF.

Polypharmacy among elderly patients in Poland: prevalence, predisposing factors, and management strategies.

INTRODUCTION: The world's elderly population is growing dramatically. Pharmacotherapy in seniors is particularly challenging due to changes in metabolism, multimorbidity, and a great interest in nonprescription drugs. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide up­to­datedata on pharmacotherapy in the geriatric population of Poland, to determine factors predisposing to polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, and to identify seniors who are most likely to require multidisciplinary interventions in the field of pharmacotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the use of all prescription and nonprescription drugs taken within 2 weeks preceding the study in a representative national sample of 3014 home­dwelling seniors aged over 65 years. The variables of age, sex, place of residence, level of education, and multimorbidity were considered. Poststratification was used to balance the sample structure to match the Polish population of 2017. RESULTS: Consumption of at least 1 drug was reported by 90.7% of the participants, and the mean number of drugs used was 5.01 (95% CI, 4.87-5.15). At least 1 nonprescription drug was used by 44.2% of the respondents, with a mean number of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.49-0.55). More than 5 drugs were taken by 53.5% of the entire population, while the use of more than 10 drugs was reported by 8.7% of the respondents, with multimorbidity as the most predisposing factor. Single­pill combinations accounted for 27.2% of medications. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of polypharmacy resulting from multimorbidity confirms the need for the implementation of combined medical and pharmaceutical care of the geriatric patients.

Long-term results of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease.

Introduction: The coexistence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of thromboembolic complications, as well as hemorrhagic incidents - percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative. Aim: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of LAAO performed in patients with CKD and non-valvular AF. Material and methods: Two hundred and seventy-two patients with AF who underwent LAAO between 2009 and 2019 were prospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: CKD (105 patients) and non-CKD (167 patients) (cut-off point: eGFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). The mean follow-up period was 25.56 months. Results: The LAAO was successful in 269 (98.9%) patients. Seven (2.6%) patients suffered an ischemic stroke, including 2 (1.9%) with CKD and 5 (3.0%) in the non-CKD (p = 0.581) group. The risk of ischemic stroke was 0.25/100 patient-years (PY) for CKD and 0.39/100 PY for the non-CKD (p =0.028) group. The LAAO was associated with a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 96.4% (CKD group) and 91.8% (non-CKD group) on average compared to expected stroke rates. Hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 1 (0.6%) patient of the non-CKD group, whereas major bleeding occurred in 1 (0.6%) non-CKD patient and 1 (1.0%) CKD patient (p = 0.427). The risk of major bleeding was 0.13/100 PY for CKD and 0.15/100 PY for non-CKD (p = 0.768), corresponding to an RRR of 97.9% (CKD) and 97.4% (non-CKD) on average compared to oral anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions: Considering the significant reduction in thromboembolic events, with a simultaneous reduction of major bleeding complications, LAAO is a safe and effective alternative for AF patients with CKD.

Long-term outcomes in patients after left atrial appendage occlusion: The results from the LAAO SILESIA registry.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy are undeniable. However, such treatment is contraindicated in 2%-10% of patients. According to the latest guidelines, percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be considered in stroke prevention. AIMS: We analyzed the data of patients from the Polish population, who had undergone LAAO procedures in the Silesian Province based on limited reports. METHODS: The data from the SILCARD database of all patients who underwent LAAO between 2006 and 2019, and the data from the databases of the centers performing the procedures in the Silesian Province were included in the LAAO SILESIA registry. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of the procedure and its relationship with the occurrence of stroke and bleeding in the post-hospital follow-up. RESULTS: We analyzed 649 patients with the mean values of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores of 4.1 and 3.2, respectively. The predominant indication for LAAO was a history of bleeding during OAC. The most frequent in-hospital major adverse cardiac events were anemia, which required blood transfusion (5.5%), and pericardial effusion, which was treated either conservatively (0.9%) or interventionally (1.2%). During hospitalization, stroke was detected in 4 patients and three patients died of any cause. LAAO reduced the annual risk of stroke by 84% and the annual risk of bleeding by 27%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a "real-life" cohort of patients from the Silesian Province, we concluded that LAAO is related to low in-hospital major cardiovascular adverse events. In the long-term follow-up, LAAO reduced the rates of stroke and bleeding.

[Percutaneous elimination of the left atrium appendage - who and when to qualify?] / Zabieg przezskórnej eliminacji uszka lewego przedsionka serca ­ kogo i kiedy kwalifikowac?

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAAO) is an alternative therapeutic option for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation who, for various reasons, do not qualify for longterm treatment with oral anticoagulants. Despite the high percentage of implantation success and an acceptable percentage of surgical complications, this method is not a procedure of choice but only a treatment option in a selected group of patients. Randomized trials have shown that LAAO is as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke, systemic embolism or cardiovascular death.

[The current state of knowledge on the percutaneous elimination of the left atrial appendage based on data from randomized trials and clinical registries]. / Aktualny stan wiedzy na temat przezskórnej eliminacji uszka lewego przedsionka serca na podstawie danych z badan randomizowanych i rejestrów klinicznych.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a well known form of thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients at high risk of thromboembolism and with serious bleeding complications during oral anticoagulation (OAC/NOAC). Despite high safety profile and high efficiency, LAAO cannot be proposed as equivalent to OAC/NOAC but only as an alternative method which may be consider in specific group of patients. According to current data LAAO is not worse than OAC in stroke, systemic embolism and cardiovascular death prevention, however it is associated with a higher percentage of periprocedural adverse events. Nevertheless, long term observation showed statistically significant reduction in total mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients who underwent LAAO compared to OAC.

Predicting Silent Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly: A Report from the NOMED-AF Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Silent atrial fibrillation (SAF) is common and is associated with poor outcomes. AIMS: to study the risk factors for AF and SAF in the elderly (≥65 years) general population and to develop a risk stratification model for predicting SAF. METHODS: Continuous ECG monitoring was performed for up to 30 days using a vest-based system in a cohort from NOMED-AF, a cross-sectional study based on a nationwide population sample. The independent risk factors for AF and SAF were determined using multiple logistic regression. ROC analysis was applied to validate the developed risk stratification score. RESULTS: From the total cohort of 3014 subjects, AF was diagnosed in 680 individuals (mean age, 77.5 ± 7.9; 50.1% men) with AF, and, of these, 41% had SAF. Independent associations with an increased risk of AF were age, male gender, coronary heart disease, thyroid diseases, prior ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (ICS/TIA), diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, and NT-proBNP >125 ng/mL. The risk factors for SAF were age, male gender, ICS/TIA, diabetes, heart failure, CKD, and NT-proBNP >125 ng/mL. We developed a clinical risk scale (MR-DASH score) that achieved a good level of prediction in the derivation cohort (AUC 0.726) and the validation cohort (AUC 0.730). CONCLUSIONS: SAF is associated with various clinical risk factors in a population sample of individuals ≥65 years. Stratifying individuals from the general population according to their risk for SAF may be possible using the MR-DASH score, facilitating targeted screening programs of individuals with a high risk of SAF.

Relationship between diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation prevalence in the Polish population: a report from the Non-invasive Monitoring for Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation (NOMED-AF) prospective cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: The global burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) is constantly rising, leading to an increasing healthcare burden of stroke. AF often remains undiagnosed due to the occurrence in an asymptomatic, silent form, i.e., silent AF (SAF). The study aims to evaluate the relationships between DM and AF prevalence using a mobile long-term continuous ECG telemonitoring vest in a representative Polish and European population ≥ 65 years for detection of AF, symptomatic or silent. METHODS: A representative sample of 3014 participants from the cross-sectional NOMED-AF study was enrolled in the analyses (mean age 77.5, 49.1% female): 881 (29.2%) were diagnosed with DM. AF was screened using a telemonitoring vest for a mean of 21.9 ± 9.1days. RESULTS: Overall, AF was reported in 680 (22.6%) of the whole study population. AF prevalence was higher among subjects with concomitant DM (DM+) versus those without DM (DM-) [25%, 95% CI 22.5-27.8% vs 17%; 95% CI 15.4-18.5% respectively, p < 0.001]. DM patients were commonly associated with SAF [9%; 95% CI 7.9-11.4 vs 7%; 95% CI 5.6-7.5 respectively, p < 0.001], and persistent/permanent AF [12.2%; 95% CI 10.3-14.3 vs 6.9%; 95% CI 5.9-8.1 respectively, p < 0.001] compared to subjects without DM. The prolonged screening was associated with a higher percentage of newly established AF diagnosis in DM+ vs DM- patients (5% vs 4.5% respectively, p < 0.001). In addition to shared risk factors, DM+ subjects were associated with different AF and SAF independent risk factors compared to DM- individuals, including thyroid disease, peripheral/systemic thromboembolism, hypertension, physical activity and prior percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft surgery. CONCLUSIONS: AF affects 1 out of 4 subjects with concomitant DM. The higher prevalence of AF and SAF among DM subjects than those without DM highlights the necessity of active AF screening specific AF risk factors assessment amongst the diabetic population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03243474.

The Extended Utility of CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED Scores in the Selection for Transcutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an option for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients. Randomized studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of LAAC but included patients with an average risk of stroke and bleeding complications. The current study aimed to assess the extended utility of CHA2DS2VASc (congestive heart failure; hypertension; age ≥75 years [doubled]; type 2 diabetes; previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism [doubled]; vascular disease; age 65 to 75 years; and sex category) and HAS-BLED (hypertension; abnormal renal/liver function; stroke; bleeding history or predisposition; labile INR, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) scores for qualification and prognosis after LAAC. METHODS: The study population comprised 270 patients aged 72.8 ± 8.78 years. The occluders used were the Amplatzer Amulet (N = 205), Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (N = 53), and Watchman device (N = 12). The prognosis after LAAC was analyzed for different cohorts of patients distinguished based on different CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores. The mean duration of follow-up was 21.6 ± 10.3 months. RESULTS: The observed rates of ischemic stroke and bleeding were much lower than that expected (2.2% vs. 5.6%, and 0.76% vs. 6.05%, respectively). The mortality rate did not differ concerning the CHA2DS2CVASc score. It was significantly lower (8.3%) for HAS-BLED < 3, and it raised to 17.9% for HAS-BLED = 3 and to 25.9% for HAS-BLED > 3. Significant differences (p = 0.003) occurred for Kaplan-Meier curves for extreme HAS-BLED subgroups. A composite endpoint was most often found in high/very high risk of bleeding patients. CONCLUSIONS: HAS-BLED, but not CHA2DS2CVASc score, may be a useful tool to predict the prognosis of patients after LAAC. Qualification for LAAC based on the risk of stroke should not differ from qualification for anticoagulation. Despite the worse prognosis of patients with the highest bleeding risk, this group is likely to experience the greatest benefit from reducing the bleeding risk from LAAC.

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D TEE) enables better visualization of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and may be superior to real-time two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT2D TEE) for LAA occlusion (LAAO). The aim of this study was to assess inter- and intra-observer variability of RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE measurements of LAA, and to assess the accordance of RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE with appropriate occluder selection. METHODS: Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 40 patients during LAAO. RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE measurements of the ostium and landing zone were performed independently by two echocardiographers. The appropriate choice of occluder was confirmed with fluoroscopic criteria. After the procedures, RT2D TEE and RT3D TEE evaluation were repeated separately by the same echocardiographers. RESULTS: The mean ostium diameters by RT2D TEE obtained by the two observers were 23.6 ± 4.2 vs. 24.8 ± 5.2 (p = 0.04), and the mean landing zone diameters were 17.7 ± 4.4 vs. 19.4 ± 3.9 (p < 0.01). In the case of RT3D TEE, the ostium diameters were 29.6 ± 5.3 vs. 29.4 ± 6.4 (p = not significant [NS]) and the landing zone diameters were 21.4 ± 3.8 vs. 21.6 ± 3.9 (p = NS). Intra-observer differences were absent in the case of RT3D TEE. The comparison of RT2D TEE vs. RT3D TEE analyses performed by the same echocardiographer revealed significant differences in the ostium and landing zone measurements (both p < 0.01). Agreement between the suggested device size was better for RT3D TEE (weighted kappa was 0.62 vs. 0.28, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with RT3D TEE showed significantly larger dimensions of the ostium and the landing zone. RT3D TEE showed lesser inter- and intra-observer variability and better agreement with the implanted device.

Comparison of transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography in guiding percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with an Amplatzer Amulet device.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAAO) is becoming an extensively used method of stroke prevention in individuals with contraindications to oral anticoagulants. Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is the gold standard for LAAO guiding, but intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears to be a potential alternative. AIM: To compare the LAAO procedure guided by TOE or ICE with respect to procedural success and safety. MATERIAL AND METHODS: TOE-guided LAAO was performed in 12 patients and ICE-guided LAAO in 11 patients. ICE was performed using an 8F AcuNav probe and the ACUSON SC2000 system. For LAAO the Amplatzer Amulet was used. After 1 month TOE was performed. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in all patients in TOE and ICE groups. There was 1 complication (groin hematoma). The procedure time was significantly longer in the TOE group (43 to 80 min; median: 54 min) compared to the ICE group (28 to 67 min; median: 45 min), (p = 0.02) The time needed to puncture the interatrial septum and time needed to remove the sheath did not differ between groups. Fluoroscopic time was insignificantly longer in the ICE group (9.91 ±4.01s) compared to the TOE group (7.69 ±3.21s), and a significantly larger contrast media volume was used in the ICE group (30.00 ±6.67 ml vs. 40.45 ±23.18 ml, p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in the results between TOE and ICE groups in follow-up assessments. CONCLUSIONS: LAAO using the Amplatzer Amulet may be successfully and safely guided by ICE. ICE offered shorter procedure time and similar results irrespectively of left atrial appendage anatomy compared to TOE guidance.