Culturally Adapted Consensus Definition and Action Guideline: Japan's Advance Care Planning.

CONTEXT: A conceptual framework for advance care planning is lacking in societies like Japan's valuing family-centered decision-making. OBJECTIVES: A consensus definition of advance care planning with action guideline adapted to Japanese society. METHODS: We conducted a multidisciplinary modified Delphi study 2020-2022. Thirty physicians, 10 healthcare and bioethics researchers, six nurses, three patient care managers, three medical social workers, three law experts, and a chaplain evaluated, in 7 rounds (including two web-based surveys where the consensus level was defined as ratings by ≥70% of panelists of 7-9 on a nine-point Likert scale), brief sentences delineating the definition, scope, subjects, and action guideline for advance care planning in Japan. RESULTS: The resulting 29-item set attained the target consensus level, with 72%-96% of item ratings 7-9. Advance care planning was defined as "an individual's thinking about and discussing with their family and other people close to them, with the support as necessary of healthcare providers who have established a trusting relationship with them, preparations for the future, including the way of life and medical treatment and care that they wish to have in the future." This definition/action guideline specifically included support for individuals hesitant to express opinions to develop and express preparations for the future. CONCLUSION: Adaptation of advance care planning to Japanese culture by consciously enhancing and supporting individuals' autonomous decision-making may facilitate its spread and establishment in Japan and other societies with family-centered decision-making cultures.

Longer virus shedding in influenza B than in influenza A among outpatients treated with oseltamivir.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the persistence, susceptibility and resistance of influenza A and influenza B viruses in oseltamivir therapy in outpatients of various ages. METHODS: Virus isolation was done before and 4-6 days after the initiation of oseltamivir therapy for 148 patients with influenza A/H3N2 and for 66 with influenza B in the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 influenza seasons. Neuraminidase inhibition assay and neuraminidase or hemagglutinin sequence analysis were done using influenza viruses isolated from these patients. RESULTS: The virus isolation rate after oseltamivir therapy was significantly higher for influenza B (33.3%) than for influenza A/H3N2 (12.8%, p<0.001). The mean IC(50) values before and after oseltamivir therapy were significantly higher in patients with influenza B (10.82 and 11.32nM, respectively) than in patients with influenza A/H3N2 (0.94 and 0.81nM, respectively, both p<0.001). No significant differences in IC(50) among each age group, or no significant increase in IC(50) from before to after oseltamivir therapy was observed. Neuraminidase or hemagglutinin sequence analysis revealed no known genotype with resistance to oseltamivir. CONCLUSION: Virus persistence after oseltamivir therapy was longer and IC(50) values were higher in influenza B than influenza A.