RESUMO
Background: There is a perceived increased health risk in senior visitors to malaria endemic countries. Methods: The authors sought to compare effectiveness and tolerability of malaria chemoprophylaxis in senior travelers (>=60 years) with those in younger travelers (20-59 years). The "Malpro 2" database consists of more than 100,000 questionnaires completed by travelers on charter planes returning from East Africa to Europe during July 1988-December 1991. Among them, 9106 (9.1%) of the travelers were 60 years or older, and 84,562 (84.6%) of the travelers reported to be 20-59 years. Variables of demography, travel data, and the effectiveness and tolerability of chemoprophylaxis were compared in the two subgroups. Results: Malaria in Africa was reported by 8 (1/1000) elderly travelers and by 189 (2.2/1000) travelers aged 20-59 years. Adjusting for age, sex, prophylaxis, and duration of stay in Africa in a logistic regression model, malaria was significantly more frequent in younger than in senior travelers (p<.05). Any travel-associated illness was reported by 7.0% in the senior age group and by 13.6% in the younger age group (p<.05). The rates of travelers who indicated they had "side effects" attributable to malaria prophylaxis varied between 9.7% in the elderly and 15.5% in the younger travelers (p<.05). Conclusion: Senior travelers tolerate malaria chemoprophylaxis and visits to the tropics at least as well as younger travelers.
RESUMO
Background: The objectives of this study were (1) to compare the efficacy of Lariam (mefloquine) with that of Fansimef (mefloquine, sulfadoxine, and pyrimethamine), Fansidar (sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine), chloroquine, and placebo in suppressing asexual parasitemia in semi-immune persons living in an area endemic for Plasmodium falciparum malaria; and (2) to compare the tolerance of these drugs when taken over a prolonged period of time. Method: A randomized double-blind comparative placebo-controlled study was undertaken in the village of Biasso, 60 km from Abidjan in the southern part of the Ivory Coast, a region where P. falciparum malaria is endemic. Four hundred and ninety nine male volunteers (five parallel groups), who were inhabitants of Biasso, were involved. The main outcome measures concerned the incidence of malaria breakthroughs (acute malaria attacks) and the incidence of parasitemia. Results: Within this strictly defined epidemiologic context, prophylaxis, taken once weekly, proved to be fully protective (parasitic index: 0) in the Lariam, Fansidar, and Fansimef groups throughout the whole study period. Prophylaxis with chloroquine proved incompletely protective (parasitic index: 2.5) The most frequent side effects were pruritus (5.6%), diarrhea (1.2%) and headache (0.06%). No significant differences in the incidence of side effects in each group (chi-square test) was observed. All side effects were transient and judged to be mild by the investigators. Conclusions: Excellent efficacy was observed in the prophylaxis of P. falciparum malaria with Lariam, Fansidar, and Fansimef as compared to the partial protection provided by chloroquine. Safety and tolerance were comparable in all groups during the whole period of observation (5 months).
