Palatability evaluation of orally disintegrating tablets using a visual analog scale in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Visual analog scale (VAS) can be used to evaluate multiple parameters. There have been no reports on the verification of order effects or reproducibility of the VAS method for overall palatability of oral dosage forms. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of a method for evaluating the palatability of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) using a 100-mm VAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted clinical trials to evaluate the overall palatability, taste, and scent of 3 ODTs (F1, F2, F3) that contained famotidine (20, 10, and 5 mg, respectively). The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Shizuoka, Japan (No. 21 - 36). To investigate the intergroup reproducibility of the VAS evaluation, 40 participants were divided into three groups, and each group underwent human gustatory sensation test of F1, F2, and F3, performed using a crossover design with 6 different tasting sequences. To evaluate intragroup reproducibility of the VAS evaluation, the participants assessed the same ODTs twice. RESULTS: The VAS scores for overall palatability followed the same order (F3>F2>F1) in all groups. The VAS scores for the overall palatability of F1, F2, and F3 did not significantly differ between the first and second evaluations. The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated a minimal impact of the assessment order on ODT evaluations. We confirm the reliability and reproducibility of the VAS method for evaluating ODT palatability. CONCLUSION: The VAS method for assessing ODT palatability provides accurate information and can contribute to the design and manufacture of patient-friendly pharmaceutical products.

Palatability of Aripiprazole Gummies Prepared from Commercially Available Products: Pharmaceutical Formulation for Improving Patient Adherence.

Good adherence to medication is critical for successfully treating psychiatric disorders. Tailor-made pharmaceutical formulations can provide a suitable dosage form to meet the specific needs of individual patients who exhibit poor adherence to industrially manufactured products. Herein, we prepared aripiprazole (ARP) gummies (ARP-Gs) using a commercially available ARP formulation. We aimed to clarify the palatability of ARP-Gs by performing a gustatory sensation test in healthy volunteers. We performed two types of organoleptic masking of ARP-Gs, cocoa- and fruit-flavoured gummies (6.0 mg of ARP/3.5 g of gummy), and conducted two different gustatory sensation tests for each ARP-G. Ten young, healthy volunteers (mean ± standard deviation, 23.7 ± 1.2 years) were enrolled in each trial. The overall palatability of ARP-Gs was evaluated using the 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed between VAS scores of total ARP-G palatability and acceptability assessed using a 5-point rating scale. Among cocoa-flavoured ARP-Gs, those combining aspartame, cocoa powder, and banana flavour (ABC-ARP-G) exhibited the highest VAS scores for total palatability. Similarly, the VAS scores of grapefruit-flavoured ARP-Gs (GF-ARP-G) showed the highest values considering all fruit-flavoured ARP-Gs. The VAS scores for ABC-ARP-G and GF-ARP-G greatly exceeded the cut-off values of acceptability calculated using the ROC curve. We developed two types of ARP-Gs with organoleptic masking as tailor-made pharmaceutical formulations. ABC-ARP-Gs and GF-ARP-Gs could be acceptable in patients. ARP-Gs could be an alternative to currently available pharmaceutical formulations to enhance their adherence and meet the specific needs of individual patients.

Prediction of the Area under the Curve Using Limited-Point Blood Sampling in a Cocktail Study to Assess Multiple CYP Activities.

A cocktail study is an in vivo evaluation method to assess multiple CYP activities via a single trial and single administration of a cocktail drug that is a combination of multiple CYP substrates. However, multiple blood samples are required to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a CYP probe drug. A limited-point sampling method is generally beneficial in clinical studies because of the simplified protocol and reduced participant burden. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a limited-point plasma concentration analysis of CYP substrates in a cocktail drug could predict their area under the curve (AUC). We created prediction models of five CYP substrates (caffeine, losartan, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, and midazolam) using multiple linear regressions from the data of two cocktail studies, and then performed predictability analysis of these models using data derived from data in the co-administration with inducer (rifampicin) and inhibitors (fluvoxamine and cimetidine). For the administration of inhibitors, the AUC prediction accuracy (mean absolute error (MAE)) were <39.5% in Model 1 and <26.2% in Model 2 which were created using 1- and 4-point sampling data. MAE shows larger values in the administration of inducer in compared with the administration of inhibitors. The accuracy of the prediction in Model 2 could be acceptable for screening of inhibitions. MAE for caffeine, dextromethorphan, and midazolam were acceptable in the model that used 4 sampling points from all data. The use of this method could reduce the burden on the subject and make it possible to evaluate each AUC in a minimally invasive manner.

Verification of a cocktail approach for quantitative drug-drug interaction assessment: a comparative analysis between the results of a single drug and a cocktail drug.

A cocktail approach is a method to comprehensively evaluate the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) by co-administering multiple CYP substrates. This is the first report that compares the results from a cocktail study to a single substrate separate administration study (single study) with concomitant administration of CYP inducers/inhibitors. The validity of a cocktail study for use as a quantitative drug-drug interactions (DDIs) assessment was evaluated.We administered a cocktail drug (caffeine, losartan, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, midazolam) with rifampicin, cimetidine or fluvoxamine. A comparative analysis was performed between the results of a cocktail study and single studies. The results of single studies were obtained from a literature review and the trials of single substrate separate administration.A strong positive correlation of the AUC ratio of all drugs between single studies and the cocktail study was obtained. The ratio of AUC change of 12 combinations converged to 0.82-1.09, and 2 combinations ranged between 0.74-1.32.The differences in the degree of interaction between the single studies and cocktail study are acceptable to evaluate DDIs for almost all combinations. Our results indicate that a cocktail study is an adequate and quantitative evaluation method for DDIs.

The Prediction of the Area under the Curve and Clearance of Midazolam from Single-Point Plasma Concentration and Urinary Excretion in Healthy Volunteers.

There are large inter- and intra-individual variations in CYP3A4 activity. Midazolam, which is predominantly metabolized to 1'-hydroxymidazolam and 4-hydroxymidazolam by CYP3A4, is considered an effective probe for CYP3A4. To determine the area under the curve (AUC) of midazolam or midazolam clearance for CYP3A4 activity, multiple plasma samples of midazolam are required. This study aimed to evaluate whether measurement of a single plasma concentration or urinary excretion of midazolam could be used to predict the AUC of midazolam in healthy volunteers. We conducted a retrospective analysis of two pharmacokinetic studies. Nineteen volunteers received intravenous (5, 15, and 30 µg/kg) and oral (15, 50, and 100 µg/kg) administration of midazolam on sequential days. The midazolam concentration in plasma and urine was determined by LC-MS/MS. Plasma midazolam concentrations showed a good correlation with the AUC at all blood sampling points after the administrations. The coefficient of determination was highest at 1-2 and 2-4 h after intravenous (>0.96) and oral administration (>0.94), respectively, among all the sampling times. The errors for bias and accuracy of prediction were the lowest at 1.5 and 4 h after intravenous and oral administration, respectively. In case of urinary excretion, a significant positive correlation between midazolam and the AUC was observed only after oral administration. Thus, the AUC of midazolam can be evaluated by blood sampling at 1.5 h after intravenous administration and at 4 h after oral administration.