Improvement in the rate of inadequate pharmaceutical treatment by orthopaedic surgeons for the prevention of a second fracture over the last 10 years.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that the low rate of osteoporosis patients treated with anti-osteoporotic drugs following surgical treatment for the first fragility fractures by orthopaedic surgeons during 3 years from 2000 to 2003 was only 13.1%. Ten years have now passed our previous study, and we hypothesized that the rate of appropriate pharmacologic treatment for the prevention of secondary fractures has improved. METHODS: We studied 730 osteoporosis patients (102 men and 628 women; average age of 78 years, range 33-102 years) who underwent surgical treatment for fragility fractures, during 3-year period from 2010 to 2012. The 730 cases consisted of 489 hip fractures and 241 distal radius fractures. All patients were admitted and underwent surgical intervention in hospitals. Variables were examined to ascertain whether pharmaceutical treatment was performed after discharge. Based on these data, we compared results for patients in the present study with those from our previous study. RESULTS: The rate of treatment with anti-osteoporosis medication in the present (16.2%) was slightly but significantly improved from that in our previous study (13.1%). The rate of pharmaceutical treatment following hip fractures increased significantly, while that following distal radius fractures showed no significant change. Regarding the categories of anti-osteoporotic drugs prescribed to the patients, the rate of treatment with bisphosphonate as a higher evidenced drug for the prevention of fractures in the present study was significantly higher than that in our previous study. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the rate of pharmacologic treatment by orthopaedic surgeons and the rate of more effective anti-osteoporotic drugs prescribed to the patients following surgical intervention for the first fragility fracture in the present study were improved in comparison with those of 10 years ago.

Underutilization of antiosteoporotic drugs by orthopedic surgeons for prevention of a secondary osteoporotic fracture.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of effective treatment and well-publicized treatment guidelines for preventing osteoporotic fractures, there are significant gaps in implementing the recommendations, and it is unknown how many patients are treated for prevention of secondary osteoporotic fractures. In this study, we investigate what percentage of osteoporosis patients were treated with antiosteoporotic drugs after osteoporotic fractures of the hip, wrist, and proximal humerus, and we discuss here the need for improvement in the treatment of osteoporosis following fracture. METHODS: We studied 422 patients with osteoporotic fractures, 91 men and 331 women, with an average age of 77.1 years (range, 52-102 years). The 422 cases consisted of 299 hip fractures, 97 distal radius fractures, and 26 proximal humerus fractures. All patients underwent surgical intervention. The variables were examined to ascertain whether osteoporosis patients were medicated with antiosteoporotic drugs at postfracture. RESULTS: Fifty-five (13%) of the 422 patients received antiosteoporotic medication at postfracture. Pharmaceutical treatment was given in 44 cases (14.7%) of hip fractures, 8 cases (8.2%) of distal radius fractures, and 3 cases (11.5%) of proximal humerus fractures. Thirty-one (7.3% of total) of the 55 patients were taking the same medication pre- and postfracture. Seven (1.7%) of the 55 were administered a different drug compared to before the fracture, and 17 (4%) started to take an antiosteoporotic drug for the first time subsequent to the fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The present rate of treatment is insufficient given the high risk of secondary fractures and the availability of appropriate drugs that would reduce that risk.