An Online Platform to Provide Work and Study Support for Young People With Mental Health Challenges: Observational and Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Young people, aged 15-25 years, are at a critical stage of life when they need to navigate vocational pathways and achieve work and study outcomes. Those with mental health problems are particularly at risk of disengagement with work and study and need effective support. The headspace Work and Study (hWS) service is an innovative online platform implemented in Australia to support young people aged 15-25 years with mental health problems to achieve work and study goals. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether the hWS service has been implemented as planned, provides appropriate support for young people, and achieves its main goals. METHODS: Data were collected via 2 methodologies: (1) the hWS Minimum Data Set, which includes data on all clients in the service (n=1139), services delivered, and service impact; and (2) a survey of hWS clients who volunteered to participate in an evaluation of the hWS service (n=137). RESULTS: The service was accessed by its defined target group, young people aged 15-25 years with mental health and work and study difficulties. Young people found the online platform to be acceptable, and the assistance provided and clinical integration useful; many young people achieved positive work and study outcomes, particularly those who engaged more times with the service. More assistance was sought for work than study goals, suggesting that the transition to work may be particularly challenging for young people. One-third (298/881, 33.8%) of the sample for the service impact analyses achieved at least 1 primary work or study outcome, and this increased to 44.5% (225/506) for those who engaged with 5 or more sessions, demonstrating that greater engagement with the service produced better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Critical work and study support can be effectively delivered via an online modality to young people with common mental health problems. Digital services are scaleable to reach many young people and are of particular value for those with difficulty accessing in-person services.

Psychometric Evaluation of the 'Evidence Based Practice Competencies Questionnaire - Cerebral Palsy'.

AIM: To understand whether knowledge translation activities are effective, good measurement of practice is required. This study investigated the psychometric properties of a self-report measure of allied health practitioner (AHP) evidence-based behaviors when working with children with cerebral palsy. METHODS: Construct validity and reliability studies were undertaken for the 12-item Evidence Based Practice Competency Questionnaire - Cerebral Palsy (EBP-CQ-CP) using the Consensus-based Standards of Measurement Instruments methods. Factor analysis tested construct validity. Weighted Kappa tested chance-corrected agreement for each item and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) the reliability of factors derived in the validity study. RESULTS: In the validity study 259 AHP completed the EBP-CQ-CP on occasion 1, and 228 on occasion 2. In the reliability study 46 AHP completed the questionnaire twice. Exploratory factor analysis determined the EBP-CQ-CP contained two scales: 'communicating evidence based expectations' and 'evidence based assessment practices'. Confirmatory factor analysis using data from the second occasion of assessment supported the findings. Excellent consistency in ratings across factor scores were obtained from 46 pairs of raters: Factor 1, ICC = 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval 0.88-0.96); Factor 2, ICC = 0.94 (95% Confidence Interval 0.88-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the interpretation of the EBP-CQ-CP in a clinically meaningful and psychometrically robust manner.

Research capacity and culture of the Victorian public health allied health workforce is influenced by key research support staff and location.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to identify and understand the self-rated research capacity and culture of the allied health workforce. METHODS. The present study was a cross-sectional survey. The Research Capacity and Culture tool was disseminated to all Victorian public health allied health departments. General demographic data were also collected, including the presence of an organisational allied health research lead. RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty fully completed surveys were returned by participants; all allied health disciplines and all grades were represented. One hundred and eighty-six participants had an organisational allied health research lead and 432 were located in a metropolitan-based health service. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) within all organisational and team research skills between those with and without a research lead, together with those in different service locations (metropolitan vs non-metropolitan). Higher self-ratings in individual research skills (P < 0.05) were primarily associated with more senior and metropolitan-located clinicians. CONCLUSION: The allied health workforce identifies as a group that is ready to build the evidence to support clinical practice yet requires a whole-systems approach to do so. The results of the present study suggest that the development of key people to build capacity at a higher organisational level has a flow-down effect on research capacity and culture.