Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Planning After Immediate Implant-based Reconstruction Using the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice Consensus Guidelines for Target Volume Delineation.

AIMS: To evaluate how common radiation therapy techniques perform in the setting of the new European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) delineation recommendations for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven Danish radiation therapy centres and six international European centres participated in this project. Two breast cancer cases (one left-sided and one right-sided) with a retropectoral implant were chosen for radiation therapy planning using deep-inspiration breath-hold. Target volumes were delineated according to ESTRO-ACROP delineation recommendations. The centres were asked to plan the cases using any radiation therapy technique according to the Danish Breast Cancer Group plan objectives. RESULTS: In total, 35 treatment plans were collected. Half of the submitted plans, for both the left-sided and the right-sided case, used the field-in-field (FiF) technique (nine for each), a quarter used volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT; five for right-sided, four for left-sided) and the remaining quarter was a mix of inverse intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), helicoidal therapy and hybrid (combined open fields and VMAT) techniques. Mean clinical target volume doses were in the range 99-102% of the prescribed dose. The median FiF mean heart dose (MHD) for right-sided radiation therapy was 1 Gy (range 0.8-3.7) and 5.2 Gy for left-sided radiation therapy (range 2.2-6.5). For right-sided radiation therapy, the median VMAT MHD was 3.42 Gy, for IMRT was 2.3 Gy and for helicoidal therapy was 5.1 Gy. For left-sided radiation therapy, the median VMAT MHD was 6.3 Gy, for IMRT was 7.8 Gy and for helicoidal therapy was 7.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Different radiation therapy techniques could be used to plan radiation therapy in the setting of IBR. FiF provided good coverage with acceptable organ at risk doses. The best dose distribution results as a trade-off between the objectives of target volume coverage and high-dose organ at risk inclusion. The radiation therapy technique affects the interplay between these objectives.

Weekly Paclitaxel plus Capecitabine versus Docetaxel Every 3 Weeks plus Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Background. We performed a randomized phase II study comparing efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) (Weetax) with three weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (Threetax), both in combination with oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week break. Patients. Thirty-seven women with confirmed metastatic breast cancer were randomized. Results. Median TTF was 174 (Weetax) versus 147 days (Threetax) (P=0.472). Median OS was 933 (Weetax) versus 464 days (Threetax) (P=0.191). Reasons for TTF were PD 8/18 (Weetax), 9/19 (Threetax); and toxicity: 8/18 (Weetax), 8/19 (Threetax). ORR was 72% (Weetax) versus 26% (Threetax) (P = 0.01). The Threetax-combination resulted in a higher incidence of leuco-/neutropenia compared to Weetax. Grade II anemia was more pronounced in the Weetax group. No difference was found in quality of life. Conclusion. Taxanes in combination with capecitabine resulted in a high level of toxicity. Taxanes and capecitabine should be considered given sequentially and not in combination.

C-erbB-2 expression does not predict response to docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer.

Breast cancer patients with c-erbB-2-positive tumours seem to benefit from anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The predictive value of c-erbB-2 for taxane sensitivity is not yet clear. The purpose of this study was to assess whether c-erbB-2 expression is associated with clinical sensitivity to docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). A total of 283 patients with metastatic breast cancer were initially enrolled in a randomised multicentre trial comparing docetaxel with sequential MF in advanced breast cancer. Paraffin-embedded blocks of the primary tumour were available for 131 patients (46%). c-erbB-2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry using a polyclonal antibody to the c-erbB-2 protein. C-erbB-2 expression was scored in a semi-quantitative fashion using a 0 to 3+ scale. Staining scores 2+ or greater were considered positive. Response evaluation was performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Overall 54 (42%) patients had c-erbB-2-positive tumours. There was no association between treatment outcome and c-erbB-2 overexpression. The overall response rates (RR) (n=128) among c-erbB-2-negative and -positive patients were 35 and 44%, respectively (P=0.359). In the MF arm (n=62), the RR was somewhat higher in the c-erbB-2 overexpressors (33% versus 18%, P=0.18). In the docetaxel arm the RRs were very similar, regardless of the c-erbB-2 expression (53% versus 53%). While several studies have suggested a prognostic and putative predictive significance of c-erbB-2 overexpression in early breast cancer, the significance of c-erbB-2 expression as a predictive factor for response to various cytotoxic treatments in advanced breast cancer is still controversial. In this study, c-erbB-2 expression could not predict response to either MF or T. Thus, tumours over-expressing c-erbB-2 are not uniformly more sensitive to taxanes and c-erbB-2 expression cannot yet be applied clinically as a predictive factor for response in advanced breast cancer.

Timing of quality of life (QoL) assessments as a source of error in oncological trials.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To produce an empirical estimate of the nature and magnitude of the error produced by incorrect timing quality of life (QoL) measurements in patients receiving chemotherapy. DESIGN: In a multicentre trial, 283 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). The QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The study design was retrospective. Data were analysed using t-tests. RESULTS: Erroneous timing affected the QoL findings in both treatment arms. At baseline, there were statistically significant differences in the MF group on the nausea/vomiting scale, with ill-timed assessment showing more symptoms, and in the T group on the physical functioning scale with ill-timed assessments indicating better QoL. The mean scores of correct vs. incorrect timings over the first 14 cycles showed statistically significant differences on several scales. In the MF group, ill-timed assessments indicated significantly worse physical functioning and global QoL, and significantly more of the following symptoms: fatigue, nausea/vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation. In the T group, ill-timed assessment showed better physical functioning, less dyspnoea and more insomnia than correctly timed assessments. The reasons for erroneous timing were not always detectable retrospectively. However, in some cases the MF group, being in standard treatment, seemed to have followed a clinical routine not involving the active participation of the study nurse responsible, whereas patients in the experimental T group were more consistently taken care of by the study nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Incorrect timing of QoL assessments in oncological trials jeopardises both the reliability of the QoL findings within treatment and the validity of QoL outcome comparisons between treatments. This issue should be emphasized in the planning of both the study design and clinical routines.

Predictive value of p53, mdm-2, p21, and mib-1 for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer.

p53 is a transcription factor that participates in cell cycle checkpoint processes and apoptosis. The protein product of the murine double minute gene 2 (mdm-2) plays a central role in the regulation of p53. In response to DNA-damaging agents, the wild-type p53-activated fragment 1 (WAF1 also known as p21) is an important downstream effector in the p53-specific growth arrest pathway. In breast cancer patients, it is unclear whether measuring p53, mdm-2, or p21 expression provides information on how patients will respond to chemotherapy. Mib-1 monoclonal antibody recognizes the proliferation-related antigen Ki-67. High tumor proliferation has previously been associated with response to chemotherapy. p53, mdm-2, p21, and mib-1 expression were assessed by immunohistochemical methods in primary tumors derived from 134 patients who took part in a randomized multicenter trial comparing docetaxel to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF) in advanced breast cancer. Low mib-1 staining correlated with negative p53 staining (P = 0.001), and mdm-2 and p21 stainings correlated positively with each other (P < 0.001). p53, mdm-2, p21, and mib-1 expression were not significantly associated with response to chemotherapy, time to progression, or overall survival in the whole patient population or in the docetaxel group. However, in the MF group, a low mib expression (<25%) and a high mdm-2 expression (> or =10%) predicted a better response (P = 0.014 and P = 0.046, respectively) to treatment and a longer time to progression in both univariate and multivariate analyses. p53 staining status was not associated with response to treatment in either group. Interestingly, tumors with both negative mdm-2 and p21 expression, irrespective of p53 status, had a high response rate to docetaxel but no response to MF. Although highly preliminary, the findings suggest that different tumor biological factors may predict response to different chemotherapy regimens with distinct mechanisms of action. The results of our phenotype analysis also indicate that it is more likely that a panel of tumor biological factors instead of only one single factor may be needed for better prediction of chemotherapy response.

Quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving either docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. A multicentre randomised phase III trial by the Scandinavian breast group.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of two alternative chemotherapy regimes on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with advanced breast cancer. In a multicentre trial, 283 patients were randomised to receive either docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Initial compliance in the QoL study was 96% and the overall compliance 82%. QoL data were available for 245 patients (T 130 and 115 MF). Both treatment groups showed some improvement in emotional functioning during treatment, with a significant difference favouring the MF group at treatment cycles 5 and 6. In the T group, the scores on the other functional scales remained stable throughout the first six cycles. There were significant differences favouring the MF group on the social functioning scale at treatment cycle 6 and on the Global QoL scale at treatment cycles 5 and 6. On most symptom and single-item scales there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. However, at baseline, the T patients reported more appetite loss, at treatment cycles 2-4, the MF patients reported more nausea/vomiting, and at treatment cycle 6, the T patients reported more symptoms of fatigue, dyspnoea and insomnia. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the mean change scores of the functional and symptom scales. Interindividual variance was, however, larger in the T group. Differences in QoL between the two treatment groups were minor. Hence, given the expectancy of comparable QoL outcomes, the choice of treatment should be made on the basis of the expected clinical effect.

Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a randomised phase III study with crossover on progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel to methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure. A randomised multicentre trial was conducted in 283 patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed previous anthracycline treatment. Docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (n = 143) was compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF; n = 139) given at day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks at dosages of 200 mg/ m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively. After progression, crossover to the alternative treatment group was recommended. There was a significantly higher overall response rate in the docetaxel 42% (CR 8% + PR 34%) than in the MF arm 21% (CR 3% + PR 18%) (P < 0.001). The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.3 months in the docetaxel arm and 3.0 months in the MF arm (P < 0.001). Docetaxel also had a significantly higher response rate of 27% following crossover compared with MF (12%). Significantly more side-effects (leucopenia, infections, neuropathy, oedema, asthenia, skin, nail changes, alopecia) were seen in the docetaxel than in the MF group. However, grade 3 and 4 side-effects were infrequent with both drugs, with the exception of fatigue, alopecia and infections. Median overall survival (OS) including crossover phase was 10.4 months in the docetaxel and 11.1 months in the MF arm (P = 0.79). Based on the response rate and the primary endpoint of TTP, docetaxel is superior to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure.

[A retrospective analysis of the treatment results in Hodgkin's disease in a radiotherapy clinic]. / Retrospektive Analyse der Behandlungsergebnisse bei Morbus Hodgkin in einer strahlentherapeutischen Klinik.

PURPOSE: Treatment results were reviewed in a retrospective analysis and compared with literature data. Prognostic factors for freedom from relapse and overall survival were identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the history of 183 patients treated for Hodgkin's disease between 1977 and 1989 at the Department of Radiation Therapy at the University of Würzburg. There were 100 males and 83 females between 16 and 86 years of age. 70.5% of patients presented with early stage Hodgkin's disease (23.5% stage I and 47.0% stage II) and 29.5% had advanced stages (25.1% stage III and 4.4% stage IV). All patients were treated initially with radiotherapy, 114 had radiotherapy alone and 69 patients received combined modality treatment. RESULTS: Hundred and sixty-one patients (88.0%) reached a complete remission. Freedom from relapse was 73.7% at 5 years and 70.3% at 10 years for these patients, overall survival was 74.3% and 62.8% at 5 and 10 years for all patients. Prognostic factors for freedom from relapse were stage IV, B symptoms, age greater than 35 years and more than 3 involved lymph node regions. These factors also were relevant for overall survival, in addition mixed cellularity or lymphocyte depleted subtype, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, failure to achieve a complete remission following initial treatment and relapse of Hodgkin's disease were identified as negative prognostic factors. Laparotomy staged patients who received radiotherapy only for stage I and II Hodgkin's disease had better outcome than clinically staged patients. Our data suggest that adequate therapy is able to reduce the impact of unfavourable prognostic factors. The outcome for patients with bulky mediastinal disease was similar to that in patients without a mediastinal mass. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal choice of treatment for patients with early stage Hodgkin's disease--combined modality treatment/radiotherapy alone/chemotherapy alone?--and for patients with advanced stages--consolidation radiotherapy?--remains an unresolved issue and needs further testing in large randomized trials considering acute and late complications. Staging laparotomy may be used only for a small group of patients who would receive radiotherapy alone as definitive treatment. Modifications of therapy clearly reduce the impact of negative prognostic factors.

[Polychemotherapy of advanced soft tissue sarcomas with 4'-epi-doxorubicin (4'-Epi-DX) and cisplatin (DDP)]. / Polychemotherapie fortgeschrittener Weichteilsarkome mit 4'-Epi-Doxorubicin (4'-Epi-DX) und Cisplatin (DDP).

34 patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma were treated with 4'-epi-adriamycin (4'-Epi-DX: 45 mg/m2 day 1 + 2) and cisplatinum (DDP: 90 mg/m2 day 2). If leukocyte- or plateletnadirs during the previous interval were above 2,000/mm3 or 70,000/mm3 the dose of 4'-Epi-DX was escalated for 5 mg/m2 per treatment day. One patient died tumor-related soon after the first treatment cycle. In 33 evaluable patients 4 (12%) complete remissions, 10 (30%) partial remissions and 15 (46%) no changes were observed. 4 patients (12%) had primary progressive disease under treatment. In 6 patients treatment was stopped because of side effects: 4 intractable nausea and vomiting, 1 ototoxicity, 1 supposed cardiomyopathy. Hematotoxicity was not a limiting factor in this treatment regimen.

Mitoxantrone in the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute leukemia.

Twenty-four patients with acute leukemia and blast crisis of chronic myelocytic leukemia in relapse or refractory to standard chemotherapy were eligible for treatment with mitoxantrone. Mitoxantrone was administered in a dose of 8-13 mg/m2 on five consecutive days. 5 of 20 evaluable patients were induced into complete remission, 1 patient achieved a partial remission. Side effects included moderate to severe bone marrow suppression, moderate mucositis and hair loss. No cardiotoxicity was observed. We believe that mitoxantrone is an active agent in the treatment of acute leukemia and suggest further studies in combination chemotherapy.

Mitoxantrone in the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute leukemia.

Twenty-four patients with acute leukemia or blast crisis (BC) of chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) in relapse or refractory to standard chemotherapy, were eligible for treatment with mitoxantrone. Mitoxantrone (Novantrone; dihydroxyanthracenedione) was administered in a dose of 8-13 mg/m2 on five consecutive days. Five of 20 evaluable patients were induced into complete remission, one patient achieved a partial remission. Side-effects included moderate to severe bone marrow suppression, moderate mucositis and hair loss. No cardiotoxicity was observed. We believe that mitoxantrone is an active agent in the treatment of acute leukemia and suggest further studies in combination chemotherapy.