What is the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in patients with a referral diagnosis of constipation in South Africa?

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common problem for referral to surgical and colorectal units. Its association with colorectal cancer is controversial. Some authors have found an increased incidence while others have not. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other significant colonoscopic pathologies in patients undergoing colonoscopy for constipation. METHOD: All colonoscopy reports for constipation were retrieved from our database from January 2011 to 30 June 2014. Data extracted included demographics, colonoscopic findings and adequacy of bowel preparation. Exclusion criteria included patients with other symptoms known to be associated with colonic neoplasia such as lower GIT bleeding, loss of weight, patients with associated anaemia, those with abnormalities on imaging, patients with personal or family history of colorectal cancers or colorectal polyps and patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The primary outcome was the presence of neoplasia at colonoscopy and the secondary outcomes were other colonoscopy findings. RESULTS: A total of 985 colonoscopies were performed from January 2011 to June 2014 of which 144 were done for a referral diagnosis of constipation. Eighty eight (61.1%) were female. Their mean age was 58.6 + 13.8 years (range 19-95 years). There were 61 (42.4%) African patients, 38 (26.4%) White, 33 (22.9%) Asians and 12 (8.3%) Coloured patients. Eighty seven (60.4%) patients had a normal colonoscopy, 20 (13.9%) diverticular disease, 14 (9.7%) polyps of which 6 (4.2%) were neoplastic, and 9 (6.3%) had colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Constipation is associated with CRC. The presence of constipation should be a criterion for colonoscopy regardless of age or any other associated clinical features.

Solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma of the colon, rectum and anus.

Solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma (SEP) is a neoplastic proliferation of a single clone of plasma cells that occur outside of the bone and bone marrow. It is rare, commonly occurring in the head and neck region, followed by the gastrointestinal tract. The aetiology, risk factors, natural history and consequent treatment are not well defined. We report an unusual case of SEP of the colon in an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patient. The patient was managed with colonic resection and made an uneventful recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of extramedullary plasmacytoma of the colon and rectum in association with HIV infection.

Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection: a pooled analysis.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine treatment characteristics and clinical outcome for patients with perineal hernia after abdominoperineal excision (APE). METHOD: A systematic search of the literature revealed 40 individually documented patients, published between 1944 and 2010. Three additional patients treated at our centre were added. Patient characteristics, type of repair and outcome were entered into a database and a pooled analysis of these 43 patients was performed. RESULTS: The pooled analysis revealed a median time interval of 8 months between APE and surgical repair of perineal hernia. The surgical approaches were perineal in 22 patients, open abdominal in 11, open abdominoperineal in three, laparoscopic in five and laparoscopic-perineal in two patients. A primary recurrence was documented in 13 patients and a second recurrence in three. The recurrence rate was 5/25 for synthetic or biological mesh, 6/12 for primary closure and 2/6 for the remaining techniques. Recurrent perineal hernia was repaired using a synthetic or biological mesh (n = 6), primary closure (n = 5) or a muscle flap (gluteus or gracilis; n = 4). CONCLUSION: From these limited and biased data based on published case descriptions, it appears that the recurrence rate of primary perineal hernia repair after APE is lower with the use of a mesh or other assisted closure than with primary suture repair.