RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Interventional rhythmology activity (electrophysiology and pacing) has progressed in France during the last decade. The objective of this article is to assess the distribution of this activity depending on the type of centre (public, university or non-university, private). As the French government issued a new regulation regarding rhythmology activity in 2022, the impact of this regulation on activity distribution has been evaluated. METHODOLOGY: All French data activity can be evaluated after accessing to a national database called PMSI [Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information]. Based on data collected in year 2021, the level of activity of the different centres, and the impact of the new criteria of the French regulation regarding rhythmology activity have been analysed. RESULTS: About 200,000 arrhythmias interventions have been done in France in 2021 in 382 centres. According to the new criteria of the French regulation, 66% responded to level A (diagnostic electrophysiology, single- and dual-chamber pacing), 68% for level B (A+ right atrial ablation, implantable automatic defibrillator, cardiac resynchronisation therapy) and 70% for level C (B + left atrial and ventricular ablation). 1/4 of the centres do not meet criteria for level A activity, and 1/5 of them for levels B and C CONCLUSIONS: This work showed that immediat and systematic application of new threshold could be threatening for 1/4 of A center and 1/5 of B or C center. The priority will be to reinforce existing centres before allowing new centres to perform arrhythmias management activity in France.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Electrical storms (ES) are serious cardiac emergencies associated with increased short-term mortality. The true incidence of ES in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still difficult to estimate because of the heterogeneous definition. The clinical presentation is variable and its management is multidisciplinary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the epidemiological profile and evolution of a group of patients implanted with an ICD who had electrical storms detected by a home monitoring system. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study, which included 14 patients who were implanted with ICDs, for primary or secondary prevention between 2008 and 2021. All of them were followed by home monitoring. All these patients had an ES detected by home monitoring and authenticated by ECG. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of onset of the electrical storm was 75.4 ± 14.5 years, with extremes ranging from 49 to 101 years. Most of patients (n = 11) were male. The majority of them had underlying ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n = 12). In a third of cases (n = 5) patients were implanted for secondary prevention. The electrical storm was related to recurrent episodes of VT. No cases of VF were detected. Syncope was the most frequent clinical presentation (four patients). Nine patients received internal shocks, with an average of four shocks per patient. The triggering factor was myocardial ischaemia in four cases. Majority of patients were managed in the cardiac intensive care unit. Two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. In addition to anti-arrhythmic treatment with amiodarone and beta blockers. Nine patients underwent ablation of ventricular tachycardia focus. Mortality was high (in half of the cases) mainly due to a cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSION: This study shows that OR remain rare, but are still associated with high mortality. Home monitoring makes it possible to manage them earlier.