Residency training on the frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic - a qualitative study from Tanzania.

INTRODUCTION: the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic has affected residency training globally. The aim of this study was to understand how the pandemic affected teaching and learning in residency programs in low resource settings where residents and faculty were working on the front line treating patients with the disease. METHODS: this qualitative study enrolled residents and faculty from the Aga Khan University in Tanzania who were providing front line care during the pandemic. Purposeful sampling was used and data was collected using focus group discussions and in-depth interviews between August and September 2020. Analysis was done using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: twelve residents and six faculty members participated in this study. Two main themes emerged. The first was: "New and unfamiliar teaching and learning experiences." Residents and faculty had to adapt to changes in the learning environment and the academic program. Residents had increased responsibilities, including providing front line care and working with reduced supervision. The second theme was: "Learning opportunities amidst crisis." There were opportunities to improve critical care and procedural skills. They also had opportunities to improve non-technical skills like teamwork and communication. CONCLUSION: residents and faculty had to adapt to changes in teaching and learning. Residents also had to take up additional responsibilities. Support systems are required to help them adapt to the changes and settle in their new roles. There were opportunities to learn new skills, and training should be restructured to maximize the use of these opportunities.

Perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital in Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Surgical Site Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among operated patients. In spite of the accessibility of universal and national guidelines for surgical prophylaxis, recent studies surveying the present routine of prophylaxis have demonstrated overutilization of a wide range antibacterial medication for a single patient. Few studies have shown qualitatively factors influencing this and perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use. Unfortunately, none of these studies have been done in Tanzania. OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital. METHODS: A qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with surgeons was conducted in English by the primary investigator. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Systematic text condensation by Malterud was used for data analysis. FINDINGS: Fourteen surgeons and obstetrics and gynaecologists participated. Their perceptions were summarized into three main categories: Inadequate data to support practice; one who sees the patient decides the antibiotic prophylaxis; prolonged antibiotic use for fear of unknown. The participants perceived that choice of antibiotic should be based on local hospital data for bacterial resistance pattern, however the hospital guidelines and data for surgical site infection rates are unknown. Fear of getting infection and anticipating complications led to prolonged antibiotics use. CONCLUSION: The study provides an understanding of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use and its implementation challenges. This was partly expressed by unavailability of local data and guidelines to enhance practice. To improve this, there is a need of guidelines that incorporates local resistance surveillance data and enhanced antibiotic stewardship programmes. A strong consideration should be placed into ways to combat the fears of surgeons for complications, as these significantly affect the current practise with use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

A missing piece: Fracture of peripheral intravenous cannula, a case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Peripheral venous cannulation is the most common procedure, often performed by junior colleagues. Despite its benign nature, it is associated with extravascular infiltration, thrombophlebitis, hematoma, catheter-associated bloodstream infections, trauma to surrounding structures, including tendon and nerve injures, hematoma formation and air embolism. Fracture of a peripheral intravenous cannula in situ is a rare, potentially serious complication that is underreported. More importantly, the etiology and prevention of this complication are not widely known by those performing cannulation. This case report will increase awareness and knowledge on intravenous peripheral cannula fracture to improve peripheral intravenous cannulation safety. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we describe a fracture of a size 18 G plastic peripheral intravenous cannula (Neovac-Neomedic) in situ in a 76-year-old hypertensive male managed at Aga Khan Hospital Dar es salaam, Tanzania. The cannula's fracture was noticed 24 h later during the cannula's removal, where a fragment of the cannula was noted, and a palpable cord-like structure was appreciated along the cubital fossa. Ultrasound was done to localize the distal segment, confirming a cannula fracture with the distal fragment's retention. Surgical exploration under local anesthetic was necessary, retrieving the fragment. There were no intra-operatively or post-operative complications encountered. Proximal migration of the segment risks the chances of developing sepsis, dysrhythmia, and myocardial infarction, but this did not occur in our case. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Reinsertion of the guide needle into the plastic sheath in situ most probably caused the fracture. Additional healthcare costs are incurred for investigation, admission, and surgical procedures. The patient experience may be affected by this complication. CONCLUSION: Understanding the guide needle's reinsertion may result in cannula fracture, allows safer cannulation practices by the clinician and adequate counseling of the patient before the procedure.