Developing a Health Literacy Scale for adults in Hong Kong: A modified e-Delphi study with healthcare consumers and providers.

INTRODUCTION: Health literacy (HL) refers to individuals' abilities to process and use health information to promote health. This study aimed to develop the first HL measurement tool for the Chinese Hong Kong population. METHODS: A two-phase methodology was adopted. In Phase I, evidence synthesis with a deductive method was conducted to formulate the item list from the literature. In Phase II, a modified e-Delphi survey was conducted among stakeholders (i.e., healthcare providers and healthcare consumers) to confirm the content validity of the item list. The stakeholders were invited to rate the relevance of each draft item on a 4-point scale and provide suggestions for revisions, removal or adding new items. RESULTS: In Phase I, a total of 34 items covering functional, interactive and critical HL were generated. In Phase II, to obtain a balanced view from experts and laypeople, healthcare professionals (n = 12) and consumers (n = 12) were invited to participate in the Delphi panel. The response rates of the three rounds were 100%. After the third round, the consensus was reached for 31 items, and no further comments for adding or revising items were received. All items exhibited excellent content validity (item content validity index: 0.79-1.00; K*: 0.74-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A Health Literacy Scale for Hong Kong was developed. Compared with existing HL scales, the scale fully operationalized the skills involved in functional, interactive and critical HL. The Delphi study shows evidence supporting the high content validity of all items in the scale. In future studies, these items should undergo rigorous testing to examine their psychometric properties in our target population groups. By illuminating the details in the development process, this paper provides a deeper understanding of the scale's scope and limitations for others who are interested in using this tool. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Public as healthcare consumers, in addition to healthcare providers, were involved in developing a new HL scale for this study. The input from the public contributed to examining the scale's content validity by judging whether all items reflected the skills that they need to find and use health-related information in their daily life.

Evaluation of the implementation of information system for postdischarge with the theoretical domains framework by healthcare professionals: a multistage design with qualitative inquiry and Delphi expert discussion protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Improving discharge information dissemination may improve patients' health literacy of self-care and health outcomes, avoid unnecessary healthcare utilisation, and reduce the healthcare cost. This study aims to use an implementation science theory guided approach to examine the beliefs and behaviours of healthcare professionals regarding postdischarge information summary (PDIS) implementation in a public inpatient setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multistage study design involving qualitative inquiry and Delphi expert discussion will be used to systematically explore the perceived barriers in the four implemented hospitals and enable the full implementation of the PDIS in geriatric and medical care. The theoretical domains framework (TDF), behavioural change wheel and realistic evaluation framework will be used to guide the investigation of implementation. This study consists of three steps: (1) identifying barriers and enablers from an implementation perspective using a TDF-informed interview guide; (2) devising theory-based implementation strategy packages to facilitate the adoption and enhancement of PDIS by performing a strategy mapping exercise and (3) developing an effective implementation strategy package for scaling up PDIS in other target hospitals as well as other specialities using the Delphi expert discussion. The goal of this multistage study design is to identify the perspectives from healthcare professionals towards the PDIS implementation and explore their barriers and facilitators of the process in the pilot phase. The invited healthcare professionals would share their daily experience on providing PDIS to patient in various study hospitals with similar ward setting. The implementation of discharge intervention in a study setting through different steps to aid in the exploration and development of the modified implementation strategies for the adoption and enhancement of PDIS in the discharge process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committees. Results of the study would be released as a report submitted to the Health and Medical Research Fund of Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong Government. The result would also be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals and presented in conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000034382.