Replacing the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment-Alcohol revised with the modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale for alcohol withdrawal to support management of alcohol withdrawal symptoms: potential impact on length of stay and complications.

PURPOSE: We evaluated impact on length of stay and possible complications of replacing the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment-Alcohol Revised (CIWA-Ar) scale with a slightly modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS-AW) to support managing patients admitted with alcohol withdrawal symptoms in a community hospital. Since mRASS-AW is viewed as easier and quicker to use than CIWA-Ar, provided use of mRASS-AW does not worsen outcomes, it could be a safe alternative in a busy ED environment and offer an opportunity to release nursing time to care. METHODS: Retrospective time-series analysis of mean quarterly length of stay. All analyses exclusively used our hospital's administrative discharge diagnoses database. During April 1st 2012 to December 14th 2014, the CIWA-Ar was used in the ED and in-patient units to guide benzodiazepine dosing decisions for alcohol withdrawal symptoms. After this point, CIWA-Ar was replaced with mRASS-AW. Data was evaluated until December 31st 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME: mean quarterly length of stay. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: delirium, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, other post-admission complications, mortality. RESULTS: N = 1073 patients. No association between length of stay and scale switch (slope change 0.3 (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.6), intercept change, 0.06 (- 0.03 to 0.2). CIWA-Ar (n = 317) mean quarterly length of stay, 5.7 days (95% 4.2-7.1), mRASS-AW (n = 756) 5.0 days (95% CI 4.3-5.6). Incidence of delirium, ICU admission or mortality was not different. However, incidence of other post-admission complications was higher with CIWA-Ar (6.6%) than mRASS-AW (3.4%) (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to compare patient outcomes associated with using mRASS-AW for alcohol withdrawal symptoms outside the ICU. Replacing CIWA-Ar with mRASS-AW did not worsen length of stay or complications. These findings provide some evidence that mRASS-AW could be considered an alternative to CIWA-Ar and potentially may provide an opportunity to release nursing time to care.

ABSTRAIT: BUT: Nous avons évalué l'impact sur la durée du séjour et les complications possibles du remplacement de l'échelle Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment- Alcohol Revised (CIWA-Ar) par une échelle d'agitation et de sédation de Richmond légèrement modifiée (mRASS-AW) soutenir la prise en charge des patients admis avec des symptômes de sevrage d'alcool dans un hôpital communautaire. Étant donné que le mRASS-AW est considéré comme plus facile et plus rapide à utiliser que le CIWA-Ar, à condition que l'utilisation du mRASS-AW n'aggrave pas les résultats, il pourrait s'agir d'une solution de rechange sécuritaire dans un environnement de SU occupé et offrir une occasion de libérer du temps pour les soins infirmiers. MéTHODES: Analyse rétrospective de séries chronologiques de la durée moyenne trimestrielle du séjour. Toutes les analyses utilisaient exclusivement la base de données des diagnostics de sortie administrative de notre hôpital. Entre le 1er avril 2012 et le 14 décembre 2014, le CIWA-Ar a été utilisé dans les unités de soins intensifs et de soins aux patients hospitalisés pour guider les décisions de dosage des benzodiazépines pour les symptômes de sevrage de l'alcool. Après ce point, CIWA-Ar a été remplacé par mRASS-AW. Les données ont été évaluées jusqu'au 31 décembre 2020. Résultat principal : durée moyenne trimestrielle du séjour. Résultats secondaires : délire, admission en unité de soins intensifs (USI), autres complications post-admission, mortalité. RéSULTATS: N = 1073 patients. Aucune association entre la durée de séjour et le changement d'échelle (changement de pente 0,3 (IC à 95 % -0,03 à 0,6), changement d'interception, 0,06 (-0,03 à 0,2). CIWA-Ar (n = 317) durée moyenne trimestrielle du séjour, 5,7 jours (95 % 4,2 à 7,1), mRASS-AW (n = 756) 5,0 jours (95 % IC 4,3 à 5,6). L'incidence du délire, de l'admission aux soins intensifs ou de la mortalité n'était pas différente. Cependant, l'incidence d'autres complications post-admission était plus élevée avec CIWA-Ar (6,6%) que mRASS-AW (3,4%) (p = 0,020). CONCLUSIONS: Il s'agissait de la première étude à comparer les résultats des patients associés à l'utilisation du mRASS-AW pour les symptômes de sevrage alcoolique en dehors des soins intensifs. Le remplacement de CIWA-Ar par mRASS-AW n'a pas aggravé la durée du séjour ou les complications. Ces résultats fournissent certaines preuves que le mRASS-AW pourrait être considéré comme une alternative au CIWA-Ar et pourrait potentiellement fournir une occasion de libérer du temps de soins infirmiers.

Impact of motivational interviewing training on emergency department nurses' skills: A one-group pretest-posttest pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Overdose from opioid abuse is an increasing cause of mortality worldwide. Emergency department nurses experience barriers when caring for patients with illicit opioid use. Motivational interviewing (MI) may help address these barriers. METHODS: A one-group pretest-posttest design was used to investigate the impact of an eight-hour MI training workshop for 39 emergency department nurses at a community hospital. Audio-recorded interviews of nurses with standardized patients were assessed before, immediately after, and three to five months after training. Proficiency was assessed using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 4.2.1. RESULTS: Paired t-test analysis found statistically significant technical score increases from 2.20 (SD = 0.64) to 2.51 (SD = 0.52, p = 0.02) but not in relational scores, 2.04 (SD = 0.59) to 2.46 (SD = 0.53, p = 0.06), during the immediate pretest-posttest period. At follow-up, proficiency in MI was unattained and both technical (2.35, SD = 0.61, p = 0.49) and relational scores regressed (2.08, SD 0.74, p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Although short-term improvements in technical scores were observed, proficiency in MI was not attained and skills regressed over time. This suggests that a one-day training session may be inadequate. On-going coaching and supervision may be beneficial to maintain MI skills.

Intranasal ketamine for analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective observational series.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and adverse effect profile of intranasal ketamine for analgesia in emergency department (ED) patients. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study examining a convenience sample of patients aged older than 6 years experiencing moderate or severe pain, defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 50 mm or greater. Patients received 0.5 to 0.75 mg/kg intranasal ketamine. Pain scores were recorded on a standard 100-mm VAS by trained investigators at baseline, then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, and then every 10 minutes for an additional 30 minutes. The primary outcome was the number and proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant reductions in VAS pain scores, defined as VAS reductions of 13 mm or more, within 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included the median reduction in VAS, the median time required to achieve a 13 mm reduction in VAS, vital sign changes, and adverse events. Continuous data are reported with medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to assess changes in VAS scores. Adverse effects are reported with proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled with a median age of 47 years (IQR = 36 to 57 years; range = 11 to 79 years) for primarily orthopedic injuries. A reduction in VAS of 13 mm or more within 30 minutes was achieved in 35 patients (88%). The median change in VAS at 30 minutes was 34 mm (44%). Median time required to achieve a 13 mm VAS reduction was 9.5 minutes (IQR = 5 to 13 minutes; range = 5 to 25 minutes). No serious adverse effects occurred. Minor adverse effects included dizziness (21 patients, 53%; 95% CI = 38% to 67%), feeling of unreality (14 patients, 35%; 95% CI = 22% to 50%), nausea (four patients, 10%; 95% CI = 4% to 23%), mood change (three patients, 8%; 95% CI = 3% to 20%), and changes in hearing (one patient, 3%; 95% CI = 0% to 13%). All adverse effects were transient and none required intervention. There were no changes in vital signs requiring clinical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal ketamine reduced VAS pain scores to a clinically significant degree in 88% of ED patients in this series. Adverse effects were minor and transient. Intranasal ketamine may have a role in the provision of effective, expeditious analgesia to ED patients.

The impact of interprofessional collaboration on nurses' satisfaction and comfort with intranasal fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers' beliefs and comfort with analgesics can impact medication decisions. Interprofessional educational interventions (IPE) improve medication delivery processes ultimately resulting in better patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact on nurses' satisfaction and comfort with administering intranasal fentanyl for pediatric pain management in the Emergency Department (ED) before and following IPE. METHODS: A protocol for administering intranasal fentanyl for children age 1-15 years with acute pain was introduced to the ED Nursing staff by an educational session conducted by a clinical pharmacist. Nurses' level of satisfaction and comfort was surveyed prior to and following IPE. Compliance with patient monitoring was determined by chart review. RESULTS: Eighty percentage of the nurses were very satisfied with the analgesic effect of intranasal fentanyl but barriers for its use included personal comfort, nurse monitoring time and age appropriateness. Most nurses felt comfortable administering intranasal fentanyl but showed increased comfort with intravenous morphine (83% versus 98%, p<0.05). Benefits cited by nurses included having a pharmacist available in the ED to assist in the delivery of intranasal fentanyl. CONCLUSION: The use of IPE facilitated knowledge sharing to improve nurses' comfort with administering analgesic medication and the quality of patient care services.

Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized double-blind trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine whether a 1:1 mixture of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) for emergency department (ED) procedural sedation results in a 13% or more absolute reduction in adverse respiratory events compared with propofol alone. METHODS: Participants were randomized to receive either ketofol or propofol in a double-blind fashion. Inclusion criteria were aged 14 years or older and American Society of Anesthesiology class 1 to 3 status. The primary outcome was the number and proportion of patients experiencing an adverse respiratory event as defined by the Quebec Criteria. Secondary outcomes were sedation consistency, efficacy, and time; induction time; and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients were enrolled, 142 per group. Forty-three (30%) patients experienced an adverse respiratory event in the ketofol group compared with 46 (32%) in the propofol group (difference 2%; 95% confidence interval -9% to 13%; P=.80). Three ketofol patients and 1 propofol patient received bag-valve-mask ventilation. Sixty-five (46%) patients receiving ketofol and 93 (65%) patients receiving propofol required repeated medication dosing or progressed to a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or less during their procedure (difference 19%; 95% confidence interval 8% to 31%; P=.001). Six patients receiving ketofol were treated for recovery agitation. Other secondary outcomes were similar between the groups. Patients and staff were highly satisfied with both agents. CONCLUSION: Ketofol for ED procedural sedation does not result in a reduced incidence of adverse respiratory events compared with propofol alone. Induction time, efficacy, and sedation time were similar; however, sedation depth appeared to be more consistent with ketofol.

Cost-effectiveness of LTBI treatment for TB contacts in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Contacts of patients with active tuberculosis ("TB contacts") with a tuberculin skin test (TST) size > or = 5 mm are currently recommended treatment for latent TB infection (LTBI). Knowing the cost-effectiveness of LTBI therapy for specific TB contact subpopulations may improve the use of limited resources by reducing the treatment of persons at low TB risk. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LTBI therapy for different TB contact populations defined by important risk factors, and to propose an optimal policy based on different recommendation for each subgroup of contacts. METHODS: A 6-year Markov decision analytic model simulating the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), number of active TB cases prevented, and costs for hypothetical cohorts of Canadian TB contacts defined by TST size, age group (< 10 y/o or above), ethnicity, closeness of contact, and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination status. RESULTS: For the majority of subgroups, the current policy of preventive therapy in those with positive TST was the most cost-effective. Nevertheless, our analysis determined that LTBI treatment is not cost-effective in nonhousehold Canadian-born (nonaboriginal) or foreign-born contacts age > or = 10 y/o. On the other hand, empirical treatment without screening of all non-BCG-vaccinated household contacts age < 10 y/o appeared cost-effective. Such an optimal approach would result in an incremental net monetary benefit of $25 for each contact investigated for a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY. Results were robust to several alternative assumptions considered in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The current practice of LTBI treatment for TB contacts with a TST size > or = 5 mm is cost-effective. A customized approach based on excluding low risk groups from screening and providing treatment to high risk contacts without screening could improve the performance of the program.

Health state utilities in latent and active tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health threat worldwide. Numerous cost-effectiveness analyses of TB screening and treatment strategies have been recently published, but none have utilized quality-adjusted life-years as recommended because of the lack of utilities for TB health states. OBJECTIVE: To characterize and compare utility scores from either active TB or latent TB infection (LTBI) participants. METHODS: Consenting patients attending a population-based screening and treatment clinic were administered the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Health Utilities Index 2/3 (HUI2/3), and a general health visual analog scale (VAS) along with demographic questions. SF-36 scores were converted to Short Form 6D (SF-6D) utility scores using an accepted algorithm. Utility results were compared across scales, and construct validity was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 162 TB patients (78 LTBI and 84 active TB) with available SF-36 and all four utility scores (Health Utilities Index 2, Health Utilities Index 3, SF-6D and VAS) were included in the analysis. Those with active TB had significantly lower SF-36 and utility scores than those with LTBI. Although all appeared to exhibit construct validity, the HUI2/3 and the VAS appeared to have significant ceiling effects, whereas the SF-6D had significant floor effects. CONCLUSIONS: Health state utility values for active TB and LTBI have been determined using different instruments. The three measures did not generate identical utility scores. The HUI2/3 was limited by ceiling effects, whereas the SF-6D appeared to display floor effects.

Health-related quality of life trajectories among adults with tuberculosis: differences between latent and active infection.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a public health threat with significant annual impacts on morbidity and mortality. However, few studies have examined the impact of active and latent TB infection (LTBI) on health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS: Patients with recently diagnosed active TB or LTBI patients were administered the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Beck depression inventory (DI) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Mixed-effect linear regression was used to compare the trajectory of HRQL over time in the two patient groups after adjusting for potential confounders. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between changes in HRQL of at least the minimal important difference. RESULTS: One hundred four active TB and 102 LTBI patients participated. At baseline, participants with active TB had significantly lower SF-36 mean domain and component scores (4 to 12 points lower, p < 0.03) and higher mean Beck DI scores (4 points higher, p < 0.0001) when compared to LBTI participants. In the responder analysis, those with active TB were associated with reporting improved scores at 6 months of at least the minimal important difference in vitality (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 5.6), role physical (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.5), mental component score (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5 to 6.9), social functioning (OR, 11.1; 95% CI, 3.8 to 33), and role emotional (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.0). CONCLUSIONS: Active TB patients had large improvements in most HRQL domains by 6 months. However, when compared to LTBI participants and US norms, HRQL was still low at completion of therapy.

Fluoroquinolones for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a significant problem globally. Treatment includes a multiple drug regimen with isoniazid, rifampicin (rifampin), pyrazinamide and ethambutol. Often, one of these medications needs to be replaced as a result of adverse events or because Mycobacterium tuberculosis develops resistance against one these first-line agents. Fluoroquinolones, particularly the newer ones, possess good in vitro (levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin) and in vivo (gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin) bactericidal activity against M. tuberculosis, making them attractive agents for the treatment of pulmonary TB. All relevant clinical trials, cohort studies and case reports investigating the clinical efficacy and tolerability of fluoroquinolones when used for the treatment of pulmonary TB were evaluated for this review. Specifically, efficacy and safety in the following indications were investigated: (i) first-line treatment of drug-sensitive pulmonary TB; (ii) first-line treatment for multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB; and (iii) treatment of patients with drug intolerance. Twenty-seven articles met our inclusion criteria; nine articles presented data from randomised, controlled or cohort studies. Seven studies used fluoroquinolones as first-line agents in drug-sensitive TB (1469 patients), 15 studies used fluoroquinolones to treat MDR-TB (1025 patients) and six studies (951 patients) investigated the use of fluoroquinolones in patients intolerant to other TB medications. In patients with susceptible M. tuberculosis strains, substitution with a fluoroquinolone did not have an effect on cure or radiological improvement at 8 weeks or failure at 12 months. Substitution of older fluoroquinolones into a regimen, especially ciprofloxacin, resulted in a higher rate of relapse and a longer time to sputum-culture conversions. The use of fluoroquinolones in patients with MDR-TB is supported by some trials where others show a lack of improvement in efficacy of a regimen. Our review of the literature does not support the use of older fluoroquinolones, especially ciprofloxacin, as substitute agents for drug-sensitive or drug-resistant TB. However, newer fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin, may be a reasonable alternative based on results from one large clinical trial. Fluoroquinolones have an important role as substitute agents for those who are intolerant of first-line TB agents.

Levofloxacin treatment of active tuberculosis and the risk of adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones are commonly used in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) for drug-sensitive patients who are intolerant to first-line antituberculous agents or who are infected with drug-resistant organisms. Despite increasing use of these agents, there is little information on their tolerance outside of clinical trial settings. OBJECTIVES: To compare overall rate of major adverse events associated with levofloxacin-containing regimen to standard therapy. METHODS: Cases (levofloxacin-containing regimen) were matched by age and sex to their control subjects (standard first-line TB drugs). Eligible patients were identified from the provincial TB database from 2001 to 2004. Drug safety was assessed by evaluation of the nature of the adverse event, the likelihood of association with the study medications, and severity. Only major side effects, that is, those who had a severe or moderate adverse event that was categorized to be definitely, probably, or possibly related to the TB medications, were considered for the analysis. RESULTS: During the 3-year study period, 102 patients received levofloxacin, and 358 patients received first-line agents for treatment of active TB. There were no significant differences between the two groups except for indication (82% of patients in the levofloxacin group had an antecedent adverse event to first-line TB drugs, whereas 18% received levofloxacin because of resistance) and concurrent use of first-line drugs (majority of patients in the levofloxacin arm were not receiving concurrent isoniazid or rifampin). The rate of any major adverse event was almost half among those using levofloxacin as among those on standard therapies (rate ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.82). After adjustment for the differences in exposure of concomitant medications, the rate of any major adverse event was similar between the levofloxacin and control arms (adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03). Furthermore, there was no difference between the levofloxacin and control arms with respect to CNS (adjusted rate ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.43), GI tract (adjusted rate ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.13), skin (adjusted rate ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.10), or musculoskeletal (MSK) [adjusted rate ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.60] related adverse events when adjusted for concomitant drugs. The results of the secondary analysis for the rate of major adverse events within the first 100 days were similar to the primary analysis. The time to the first major adverse event was similar between the levofloxacin group and the control group (adjusted hazards ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of a levofloxacin-containing regimen resulted in a similar rate of adverse events compared with conventional first-line regimens when used for treatment of active TB, despite a history of adverse events.