Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 29(12): 1273-1287, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31669106

RESUMO

AIMS: Dietary pattern (DP) analysis has emerged as a holistic method to understand the effects of food intake on health outcomes. Though dietary intake has been associated with cardiovascular disease, the association of DPs and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), a robust early marker of cardiovascular disease progression has not been comprehensively investigated. This study systematically explores the association of a posteriori and a priori DPs and CIMT. DATA SYNTHESIS: Through a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, twenty studies that derived DPs using a posteriori or a priori methods with CIMT as an outcome were included. Four cross-sectional studies and 1 cohort paper reported a statistically significant association between increased consumption of 'unhealthy' foods (i.e processed meat, soda drinks and refined grain) and increased CIMT. While four cross-sectional studies reported a statistically significant association of DPs characterized by increased consumption of 'healthy' foods (i.e fruit and vegetables, fish) and decreased CIMT. DPs derived from each study varied depending on derivation method, study design and use of dietary data collection method. CONCLUSION: Findings from this review are generally supportive of a trend between DPs with higher consumption of 'healthy' foods and lower consumption of 'unhealthy' foods and decreased CIMT; however, the association was largely not statistically significant. Evidence was overwhelmingly heterogeneous due to differences seen in DPs based on location and culture, sample characteristics and adjustment for confounders. Long-term prospective observational and interventional studies with standardized sample selection and dietary data collection are needed to significantly establish the role of DPs on CIMT.


Assuntos
Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Espessura Intima-Media Carotídea , Dieta Saudável , Dieta , Comportamento Alimentar , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/epidemiologia , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/prevenção & controle , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Dieta Mediterrânea , Abordagens Dietéticas para Conter a Hipertensão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Nutritivo , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevenção Primária , Prognóstico , Fatores de Proteção , Recomendações Nutricionais , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
3.
Clin Obes ; 6(6): 365-375, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27869360

RESUMO

The ratio between fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) has been used to discriminate individual differences in body composition and improve prediction of metabolic risk. Here, we evaluated whether the use of a visceral adipose tissue-to-fat-free mass index (VAT:FFMI) ratio was a better predictor of metabolic risk than a fat mass index to fat-free mass index (FMI:FFMI) ratio. This is a cross-sectional study including 3441 adult participants (age range 18-81; men/women: 977/2464). FM and FFM were measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis and VAT by ultrasonography. A continuous metabolic risk Z score and harmonised international criteria were used to define cumulative metabolic risk and metabolic syndrome (MetS), respectively. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to test associations between body composition indexes and metabolic risk. In unadjusted models, VAT:FFMI was a better predictor of MetS (OR 8.03, 95%CI 6.69-9.65) compared to FMI:FFMI (OR 2.91, 95%CI 2.45-3.46). However, the strength of association of VAT:FFMI and FMI:FFMI became comparable when models were adjusted for age, gender, clinical and sociodemographic factors (OR 4.06, 95%CI 3.31-4.97; OR 4.25, 95%CI 3.42-5.27, respectively). A similar pattern was observed for the association of the two indexes with the metabolic risk Z score (VAT:FFMI: unadjusted b = 0.69 ± 0.03, adjusted b = 0.36 ± 0.03; FMI:FFMI: unadjusted b = 0.28 ± 0.028, adjusted b = 0.38 ± 0.02). Our results suggest that there is no real advantage in using either VAT:FFMI or FMI:FFMI ratios as a predictor of metabolic risk in adults. However, these results warrant confirmation in longitudinal studies.


Assuntos
Composição Corporal , Síndrome Metabólica/fisiopatologia , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Sarcopenia/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Impedância Elétrica , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Fenótipo , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia , Sarcopenia/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...