Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

PURPOSE: The K-line, which is a virtual line that connects the midpoints of the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal at C2 and C7 in a plain lateral radiogram, is a useful preoperative predictive indicator for sufficient decompression by laminoplasty (LMP) for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). K-line is defined as (+) when the peak of OPLL does not exceed the K-line, and is defined as (-) when the peak of OPLL exceeds the K-line. For patients with K-line (-) OPLL, LMP often results in poor outcome. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcome of LMP, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion (PDF) and anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) for patients with K-line (-) OPLL. METHODS: The present study included patients who underwent surgical treatment including LMP, PDF and ADF for K-line (-) cervical OPLL. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcome of those patients in terms of Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score) recovery rate. RESULTS: JOA score recovery rate was significantly higher in the ADF group compared with that in the LMP group and the PDF group. The JOA score recovery rate in the PDF group was significantly higher than that in the LMP group. CONCLUSIONS: LMP should not be used for K-line (-) cervical OPLL. ADF is one of the suitable surgical treatments for K-line (-) OPLL. Both ADF and PDF are applicable for K-line (-) OPLL according to indications set by each institute and surgical decisions.

Two-staged hindfoot reconstruction with vascularized fibula graft for calcaneal osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a case report.

Hindfoot reconstruction after calcaneal osteomyelitis is a challenging procedure designed to restore the weight bearing function of the heel and to allow a functional reconstruction of the Achilles tendon. Some patients require subtalar arthrodesis after primary calcaneal osteosyntesis or hindfoot reconstruction due to the considerable pain associated with weight-bearing caused by the irregular surface of the subtalar joint. To date, no reports have shown a case of hindfoot reconstruction with subtalar arthrodesis using a pedicled vascularized fibula graft. We report a case of a 24-year-old woman who presented with calcaneal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis after open comminuted fracture due to a fall. Radical debridement of bone and soft tissue was repeated six times in combination with negative pressure wound therapy, followed by hindfoot reconstruction with pedicled vascularized fibula and subtalar arthrodesis. Good functional restoration had been achieved by the final follow-up 18 months after surgery.

An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the surgical outcome of anterior decompression with spinal fusion (ASF) with the surgical outcome of laminoplasty for patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. METHODS: The study group comprised 19 ASF patients (A-group) and 40 laminoplasty patients (P-group) treated from 1993 to 2002 with 1 year or longer follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system was used to evaluate cervical myelopathy, and the recovery rate calculated 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean recovery rate was 68.4% in the A-group and 52.5% in the P-group (P<0.05). Fifteen patients had a recovery rate less than 40%: 2 in the A-group and 13 in the P-group. One P-group patient and none of the A-group patients developed postoperative aggravation of their neurologic status. The P-group was divided into 2 subgroups: a good outcome group comprising patients whose recovery rate was 40% or higher (n=27) and a poor outcome group comprising patients whose recovery rate was less than 40% (n=13). The mean age at surgery was 59.9 years in the good outcome group and 68.0 years in the poor outcome group (P<0.05). The mean range of intervertebral mobility at maximum cord compression level before surgery was 6.9 degrees in the good outcome group and 10 degrees in the poor outcome group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that the surgical outcome of ASF was superior to the surgical outcome of laminoplasty. Elderly patients treated with laminoplasty showed an especially poor surgical outcome. We suggest that hypermobility of vertebrae at the cord compression level is a risk factor for poor surgical outcome after laminoplasty. Based on these results, we recommend that ASF should be the first choice of treatment for patients with significant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and a hypermobile cervical spine. When laminoplasty is used for such cases, the addition of posterior instrumented fusion would be desirable for stabilizing the spine and decreasing damage to the spinal cord.

[Two cases of adult tethered cord syndrome with surgical treatment].

We report two cases of adult tethered cord syndrome alleviated by untethering surgery. Case 1 was a 35 year-old female who complained of incontinence while exercising. Radiograph revealed spinal disraphism below the L5 level. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed low placed conus medullaris at the levels of S2 and sacral intradural lipoma. Further urodynamic studies demonstrated normal sphincteric function and autonomous bladder. Diagnosis resulted in the decision to perform an untethering operation. The patient had increased bladder compliance after surgery for untethering and has continued to be continent 16 months post-operatively. Case 2 was a 27-year old female who complained of apprehension to void and straining during urination. Radiograph demonstrated spinal disraphism below the S2 level and MRI revealed low placed conus medullaris at the level of S5 and sacral intradural lipoma. Urodynamic examination verified normal sphincteric function and autonomous bladder. After complete diagnosis, an untethering operation was performed. Post-operatively, bladder compliance and urinary sensation normalized. Furthermore, the patient spontaneously delivered a baby 3 years after having the untethering operation.

Clinical results of surgery for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: operative indication of posterior decompression with instrumented fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical outcomes of several surgical procedures for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of myelopathy treatment and safety of posterior decompression with instrumented fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many different surgical procedures have been used for the treatment of thoracic OPLL. However, the possibility of postoperative paraplegia remains a major risk, and consistent protocols and procedures for surgical treatment of thoracic OPLL have also not been established. METHODS: A total of 51 patients who underwent surgery for thoracic OPLL were classified into 3 groups: (1) posterior decompression group (18 patients), which included 12 who underwent laminectomy and 6 who underwent cervicothoracic laminoplasty; (2) OPLL extirpation group (16 patients), which included 4 who underwent anterior decompression through thoracotomy and 12 who underwent anterior decompression through the posterior approach; and (3) posterior decompression and fusion group (17 patients), all of whom underwent laminectomy with posterior instrumented fusion. In each group, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score was used to evaluate thoracic myelopathy, and the recovery rate calculated 1 year after surgery and at final examination. RESULTS: Mean recovery rate at final follow-up was 41.9% in the posterior decompression group, 62.1% in the OPLL extirpation group, and 59.3% in the posterior decompression and fusion group. Postoperative paralysis occurred in 3 patients in the posterior decompression group and in 3 in the OPLL extirpation group. In the OPLL extirpation group, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid occurred in 8 patients and hydrothorax in 2. Late neurologic deterioration occurred in 7 patients in the posterior decompression group. There were no cases of postoperative paralysis or late neurologic deterioration in the posterior decompression and fusion group. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable degree of neurologic recovery was obtained by posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, despite the anterior impingement of the spinal cord by OPLL remaining. In addition, the rate of postoperative complications was extremely low with this procedure. We recommend that 1-stage posterior decompression and instrumented fusion be selected for patients in whom the spinal cord is severely damaged before surgery and/or when extirpation of OPLL is associated with increased risk.