Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(1): 96-105.e8, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37816460

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a serious systemic reaction-data on fatal and near-fatal reactions are limited. OBJECTIVE: To better understand clinical patterns and risks factors of severe anaphylaxis by a deep analysis of data from fatal and near-fatal anaphylaxis. METHODS: Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry on fatal/near-fatal anaphylactic reactions and national data on anaphylaxis fatalities were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 305 fatal/near-fatal reactions among children and adults including 35 fatalities from the European Anaphylaxis Registry were identified. The most frequent elicitors were drugs, insects, and food. Male patients (66%/60%) were more frequently affected. Male sex, higher age, concomitant mastocytosis, and cardiovascular disease were associated with a more severe outcome. With increasing reaction severity, skin symptoms were less frequently observed (45% of fatal reactions). In parallel, anaphylaxis mortality rates were studied. The data show that anaphylaxis mortality rates increased in Germany from 0.48 (2009) to 0.59 per 1,000,000 population per year (2020). This increase was apparent only in the female population. In this data set, drugs were the most frequent elicitor of anaphylaxis fatalities, and the rate for this increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: We identified not only elicitors but also individual factors to be associated with an increased risk of fatal anaphylaxis. Such patients should be recognized and managed with great caution. The increase in drug-induced fatalities points to the need for a better allergological care of patients suffering from drug hypersensitivity.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Saúde Pública , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Alérgenos
4.
Pneumologie ; 76(12): 924-926, 2022 12.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36479680
5.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 101, 2022 Mar 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331203

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Germany, the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was registered on 28 January 2020. By February 2021, the third wave of the pandemic began. So far, only few data are available on the SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and the clinical impact of an infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: From February 2020 until March 2021, we screened 156 CF patients for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (serology) and the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in deep throat saliva or nasopharyngeal swabs (molecular testing). From patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, we recorded symptoms and collected clinical data. RESULTS: In total, 13 patients (8.3%) were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, most of them during the second and the beginning third wave of the pandemic. Ten positive tested patients described symptoms linked to COVID-19. The most common symptom was cough followed by fatigue and headache. SARS-CoV-2 infection did not impair lung function. No positive tested patient needed to be hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with CF are not as rare as initially anticipated, as frequent testing revealed. However, infected patients did not experience more severe clinical courses or worse clinical outcome. Our observation is in line with published reports indicating that individuals with CF are not at higher risk for severe COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/complicações , Fibrose Cística/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Ventilação Pulmonar , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia
6.
Allergy ; 75(4): 901-910, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31584692

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of anaphylaxis are at risk of future anaphylactic reactions. Thus, secondary prevention measures are recommended for these patients to prevent or attenuate the next reaction. METHODS: Data from the Anaphylaxis Registry were analyzed to identify secondary prevention measures offered to patients who experienced anaphylaxis. Our analysis included 7788 cases from 10 European countries and Brazil. RESULTS: The secondary prevention measures offered varied across the elicitors. A remarkable discrepancy was observed between prevention measures offered in specialized allergy centers (84% of patients were prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors following EAACI guidelines) and outside the centers: Here, EAACI guideline adherence was only 37%. In the multivariate analysis, the elicitor of the reaction, age of the patient, mastocytosis as comorbidity, severity of the reaction, and reimbursement/availability of the autoinjector influence physician's decision to prescribe one. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the low implementation of guidelines concerning secondary prevention measures outside of specialized allergy centers, our findings highlight the importance of these specialized centers and the requirement of better education for primary healthcare and emergency physicians.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Prevenção Secundária , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Brasil , Epinefrina , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Sistema de Registros
9.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(7): 1984-1988, 2018 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29590400

RESUMO

Background: Drivers of antibiotic (AB) resistance (ABR) include outpatient treatment, hospital care and animal husbandry. During the first phase of the One Health project RAI (Responsible Antibiotic Use via Information and Communication) surveys were conducted in these sectors. Objectives: To compare perceptions and attitudes towards ABR among general practitioners (GPs), hospital physicians, veterinarians, pig farmers and the general public. Methods: Cross-sectional questions on AB use and ABR were integrated in group-specific surveys of GPs, hospital physicians, veterinarians, pig farmers and the German general population. Results: A total of 1789 participants (340 GPs, 170 hospital physicians, 215 pig farmers, 60 veterinarians and 1004 members of the public) responded. Each group tended to identify drivers of ABR as being from outside its own area of activity. Guidelines were shown to be an important information source for AB therapy for all prescriber groups, but the frequency of routine use differed (39% of GPs, 65% of hospital physicians and 53% of veterinarians). Regarding further information sources, hospital physicians preferred smartphone apps and e-learning, GPs preferred non-sponsored training and veterinarians preferred multidisciplinary networks and e-learning. Farmers were predominantly satisfied with existing solutions. Farmers had three times better basic knowledge of ABR and knew twice as many people with MDR organism problems than the general public. They also received information on ABR more often from their veterinarians than patients did from their doctors. Conclusions: This study reveals considerable differences in perceptions and attitudes to ABR among the groups investigated. The results can help to tailor future interventions. Furthermore, they promote mutual understanding and thus support the One Health approach.


Assuntos
Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Fazendeiros , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Médicos , Saúde Pública , Médicos Veterinários , Criação de Animais Domésticos/métodos , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Estudos Transversais , Alemanha , Humanos , Aplicativos Móveis , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suínos
10.
J Rheumatol ; 44(6): 806-814, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28412705

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is characterized by frequent relapses following induction therapy. Interferon-α (IFN-α) can reverse the underlying Th2-driven immune response and has successfully induced remission in previous reports. We undertook this study to investigate its efficacy and safety in patients with EGPA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric cohort study including 30 patients (16 women) with active EGPA under IFN-α treatment. Primary endpoints were remission induction, occurrence of relapses, prednisolone (PSL) dosage at time of remission, and adverse events. Remission was defined by a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) of 0. Pulmonary function tests were recorded at baseline and at time of remission. Health-related quality of life was analyzed by questionnaire at baseline and following 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, the median BVAS was 6 (interquartile range 4-13.5) and remission or partial response was achieved in 25/30 patients. After initiation of IFN-α treatment, the median PSL dosages could be reduced from 17.5 mg/day at baseline to 5.5 mg/day at time of remission. Following remission, 17 relapses (5 major) in 16 patients were observed. Pulmonary function tests improved and the time of hospitalization decreased. Adverse events at initiation of treatment were common, but mostly transient. Severe adverse events occurred during treatment in 4 patients (autoimmune hepatitis, n = 1; drug-induced neuropathy, n = 3). CONCLUSION: IFN-α treatment results in high rate of remission and maintenance in EGPA with significant reduction in oral corticosteroids, although reversible adverse events may occur. IFN-α represents an alternative therapeutic option in cases of refractory to standard treatment.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Infection ; 44(5): 667-72, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27380386

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to review the management of patients with influenza during the influenza season 2014/2015 (n = 197). Our study revealed a high rate of healthcare-associated influenza infection (35.5 %) and a correlation between the total number of patients with HA influenza and the number of nurses on sick leave. The results of the study underline the importance of strict hygiene management. Furthermore, widespread influenza vaccination for both high-risk patients and health care workers is recommended.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecção Hospitalar/terapia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Humanos , Influenza Humana/terapia , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estações do Ano
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...