Positive health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey among community-dwelling older individuals in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) reached the Netherlands in February 2020. To minimize the spread of the virus, the Dutch government announced an "intelligent lockdown". Older individuals were urged to socially isolate completely, because they are at risk of a severe disease course. Although isolation reduces the medical impact of the virus, the non-medical impact should also be considered. AIM: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictive measures on the six dimensions of Positive Health in community-dwelling older individuals living in the Netherlands, and to identify differences within subgroups. METHODS: In May/June 2020, community-dwelling older individuals aged ≥ 65 years completed an online survey based on Huber's model of Positive Health. Positive Health was measured regarding the appreciation of the six dimensions (categorized as poor/satisfactory/excellent) and a comparison with a year before (categorized as decreased/unchanged/increased) using frequencies (%) and a chi-square test. RESULTS: 834 older individuals participated (51% women, 38% aged ≥ 76 years, 35% living alone, 16% self-rated poor health). Most respondents assessed their bodily functions, mental well-being and daily functioning as satisfactory, their meaningfulness and quality of life (QoL) as excellent, and their social participation as poor. 12% of the respondents reported a deterioration of 4-6 dimensions and 73% in 1-3 dimensions, compared to the past year. Deterioration was most frequently experienced in the dimension social participation (73%), the dimension mental well-being was most frequently improved (37%) and quality of life was in 71% rated as unchanged. Women more often observed a deterioration of 4-6 dimensions than men (15% vs. 8%, p = 0.001), and individuals with self-rated poor health more often than individuals with self-rated good health (22% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Older individuals living alone experienced more frequently a decrease in meaningfulness compared to older individuals living together. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictive measures had a substantial impact on all six dimensions of Positive Health in community-dwelling older individuals, especially in women, respondents living alone and respondents with self-rated poor general health.

Serum Dickkopf 1 levels in sclerostin deficiency.

CONTEXT: Sclerostin and Dickkopf 1 (DKK1) are antagonists of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, both binding to the same low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 on osteoblasts, thereby inhibiting bone formation. It is not known whether there is an interaction between sclerostin and DKK1. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether a lack of sclerostin is compensated by increased DKK1 levels. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We measured DKK1 levels in serum samples of patients and carriers of sclerosteosis (19 patients, 24 carriers) and van Buchem disease (VBD) (13 patients, 22 carriers) and 25 healthy controls. Sclerosteosis and VBD are caused by deficient sclerostin synthesis and are characterized by increased bone formation and hyperostotic phenotypes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: DKK1 levels were compared between patients and carriers, and between patients and healthy controls. We also examined associations between levels of DKK1 and the bone turnover markers procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide and carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide. RESULTS: We found that DKK1 levels were significantly higher in patients with both sclerosteosis (4.28 ng/mL [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.46-5.11 ng/mL]) and VBD (5.28 ng/mL [95% CI, 3.84-6.71 ng/mL]), compared to levels in carriers of the two diseases (sclerosteosis, 2.03 ng/mL [95% CI, 1.78-2.29 ng/mL], P < .001; VBD, 3.47 ng/mL [95% CI, 2.97-3.97 ng/mL], P = 0.017) and to levels in healthy controls (2.77 ng/mL [95% CI, 2.45-3.08 ng/mL]; P = 0.004 and P < .001, respectively). Serum DKK1 levels were positively associated with levels of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide and carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide in both disorders. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that increased DKK1 levels observed in patients with sclerosteosis and VBD represent an adaptive response to the increased bone formation characterizing these diseases, although these increased levels do not compensate for the lack of sclerostin on bone formation.

Sclerostin: current knowledge and future perspectives.

In recent years study of rare human bone disorders has led to the identification of important signaling pathways that regulate bone formation. Such diseases include the bone sclerosing dysplasias sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease, which are due to deficiency of sclerostin, a protein secreted by osteocytes that inhibits bone formation by osteoblasts. The restricted expression pattern of sclerostin in the skeleton and the exclusive bone phenotype of good quality of patients with sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease provide the basis for the design of therapeutics that stimulate bone formation. We review here current knowledge of the regulation of the expression and formation of sclerostin, its mechanism of action, and its potential as a bone-building treatment for patients with osteoporosis.