Endurance of trunk muscles in persons with chronic low back pain: assessment, performance, training.

Trunk muscles are designed to fulfill their role of continuous activity throughout the day, but pain and inactivity alter muscles so that they fatigue in normal situations. Lack of endurance of the trunk muscles is an important factor in low back pain (LBP). This paper examines some methods to objectively test endurance of trunk flexor and extensor muscles in static and dynamic situations, and presents results of endurance testing in persons with chronic LBP compared to nonimpaired cohorts. Self perception of fitness affects some test results. Methods for increasing endurance are discussed along with benefits observed from training programs.

Some endurance measures in persons with chronic low back pain.

Muscle fatigue and lack of endurance are complaints of persons with chronic low back pain, but there are no standard ways to assess endurance in this population. The purposes of this study were to examine three measures of endurance; to determine relationships of these measures to each other; and to describe effects of gender, obesity, smoking, and self-reported fitness on the clinical measures. The measures of endurance selected were not dependent on maximal voluntary muscular contractions. They were the Sorensen test, median frequency decline of selected muscles, and a submaximal bicycle ergometer test. Thirty-five consenting individuals who were referred for treatment answered questions about their daily exercise prior to being tested. Repeatability of the Sorensen test holding time and of the slope measure of decline in the median frequencies was acceptable for subjects who reported a higher activity level. The decline of the median frequency in the biceps femoris muscles correlated with holding time of the Sorensen test. Smoking, gender, or obesity level did not affect test results on any of the endurance measures. Subjects who reportedly were more active achieved significantly higher scores on the Sorensen test. The importance of controlling for self-perception of activity in physical testing is discussed.

Distinguishable groups of musculoskeletal low back pain patients and asymptomatic control subjects based on physical measures of the NIOSH Low Back Atlas.

STUDY DESIGN: The authors performed an empirical prospective study of 115 patients referred to physical therapy for low back pain and 112 control subjects of similar age and gender. OBJECTIVES: The authors defined and compared subgroups based on physical tests and described demographic and psychosocial characteristics by group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective studies of intervention for persons with low back pain are limited by inability to randomize subjects into distinguishable groups. Previous attempts have not been empirical and have not focused on musculoskeletal LBP. METHODS: Ten physical therapists administered 52 tests and 6 questionnaires to subjects in seven different clinics. Data were subjected to reliability and cluster and comparative analyses. RESULTS: Tests were reliable. Groups were distinguished by measures of symmetry, flexibility, strength, and dynamic mobility. CONCLUSION: Distinguishable groups can be determined; decreased trunk mobility characterized all groups of patients and imbalances in muscle length, strength, and symmetry described specific groups of subjects with and without low back pain.

Endurance training of trunk extensor muscles.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of an endurance exercise protocol on the isometric holding time of the trunk extensor muscles (mechanical fatigue measure) and on the recorded median frequency (MF) measurements from the surface electromyogram (physiological fatigue measure). SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight healthy female volunteers were selected to participate in the study. METHODS: The subjects were stratified by activity level and then assigned to an exercise or a control group and tested at weeks 0, 3, and 6. Reliability (r) of the measurements, established by testing each subject twice at week 0, was .87. Exercise group subjects trained at home twice daily for 6 weeks, progressing by established protocol. RESULTS: The exercise group subjects increased their isometric holding time by 22% after 6 weeks. The control group showed no significant changes. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The home program was believed to be effective for increasing isometric endurance of the trunk extensors, measured by holding time. The MF measurements prior to and just after a fatiguing contraction remained stable over time. The change in the slope of the MF with fatigue did not reach statistical significance. This physiologic measure of fatigue did not show commensurate changes with training in this group of subjects. Possible reasons for the results are discussed.

A technique for needle localization in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation.

Invasive electromyography (EMG) of the paraspinal muscles is useful in clinical and research settings. No technique for localization of the needle in specific fascicles has been validated. Recent descriptions of the segmented innervation of the multifidus imply that such a technique would add greatly to the EMG determination of root level of a radiculopathy. We have developed a technique for localization which relies on palpation of bony structures and needle insertion at certain angles and depths. The technique was evaluated by injecting latex dye in 199 locations in 13 cadavers. Dissection demonstrated that the technique was accurate in 91 of 112 injections into specific fascicles of the multifidus (originating from different spinous processes), 39 of 43 injections into the longissimus, and 35 of 44 injections into the iliocostalis. Certain types of errors would not have occurred with the aid of EMG in vivo. When these are added to the correct injections, accuracy improves 97%, 93%, and 82%, respectively. The technique described here should be useful for kinesiological studies, biopsies and injections, as well as for the EMG confirmation of a radiculopathy.

EMG to torque relationship in rectus abdominis muscle. Results with repeated testing.

Rectus abdominis muscles of young healthy female volunteers were studied to determine both the maximum strength in isometric flexion and the relation between the surface electromyogram (RMS EMG) and torque. Both the upper and lower portions of the abdominal muscle were studied during graded increase and decrease of torque. Repeated testing was performed over 6 weeks. The form of the relation between torque and EMG was better described by a quadratic than by a linear regression relationship, but with considerable variability about the best-fit line. The torque-increasing and torque-decreasing parts of each test were different and were analyzed separately. After 6 weeks of repeated testing, maximum voluntary isometric flexion torque increased 16.8% (P less than 0.01). There was a decrease in the ratio of electromyographic activity to torque production, which was statistically significant in the torque-increasing recordings. These changes in maximum torque and in the EMG-torque relation were attributed to learning through a test-retest effect, rather than to a true change in muscle characteristics. These findings, which show changes in normal subjects undergoing repeated testing, do not support the reliability of isometric strength measurements, or measurements based on RMS EMG recordings, for quantifying abdominal muscle function in patients with back pain, or those undergoing strengthening exercises.

Comparison of acoustic and electrical signals from erectores spinae muscles.

Comparison was made between simultaneous recordings of the electromyogram (EMG) and acoustic myogram (AMG) signals and the torque produced by the lumbar erectores spinae muscles of three healthy subjects while they performed isometric contractions. Repeatability of each signal was studied. The AMG had a relationship to the torque which was more quadratic than linear, whereas that of the EMG was more linear. The coefficient of variability of residuals about a "best-fit" line was 8.55% for torque-increasing EMG recordings and 19.2% for torque-increasing AMG recordings. At the same torque, the EMG was on average about 10% greater for increasing-torque recordings than for decreasing-torque parts of the recordings, but the magnitude of the AMG signal was about 10% less. With repeated testing on the same day, the coefficient of variability of the signal/torque relationship (torque-increasing) was 9% for EMG and 23% for AMG signals. With long-term testing over 2 weeks these coefficients were 23 and 39%, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that the two signal/torque relationships varied independently of each other.

Trunk extensor EMG-torque relationship.

The integrated surface electromyogram (IEMG) of the lumbar erectores spinae and the torque generated were simultaneously recorded from 27 healthy subjects in the standing posture while they pulled isometrically against resistance provided by a harness around the shoulders. The IEMG-torque ratio (efficiency of electrical activity, or EEA) was used to characterize each subject. Individual recordings showed evidence of nonlinearity of the IEMG-torque relationship in that a statistically better fit to experimental recordings was obtained by using two straight lines with a breakpoint between them. However, with repeated testing, the gradients of these two lines were more variable than the slope of the single straight line fitted to the entire recording. The slope of the best fit line (EEA) was less for recordings made during torque decrease than for increasing-torque recordings. This also showed as a "hysteresis" pattern in the recordings. The coefficient of variability (within subjects) of the EEA was greater in day-to-day testing (24%) than with repeated pulls at the same testing session (14%). This was similar to variability of the maximum generated torque. About 25% of the variability between subjects was found to be due to anthropometric differences. The residual variability of the relationship would limit the accuracy of IEMG as a measure of muscular effort under changing torque conditions. However, the EEA may be useful for characterizing muscle performance, especially when maximum effort cannot be achieved.

The power struggle: definition and evaluation of power of muscular performance.

The authors define five different measurements of power of muscular performance. Using an isokinetic dynamometer, the velocity of motion is constant and thus can be controlled. Power, therefore, can be readily assessed. The speed of muscular contraction is of physiological and functional interest. The time it takes for muscles to develop force, the rate at which muscles can contract and sustain a force throughout the range of motion, and the relationship of speed to force are all facets of power. At least five terms which connote power of muscular performances are used today. These terms are power, peak power, average power, instantaneous power, and contractile power. The current misunderstanding of the terms and their misuses are discussed. Suggestions are offered for circumventing confusion in using power to describe motor performance.