High mortality rate for patients requiring intensive care after surgical revision following bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: To report the prognosis and management of patients reoperated for severe intraabdominal sepsis (IAS) after bariatric surgery (S0) and admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) for organ failure. METHODS: A French observational study in a 12-bed adult surgical intensive care unit in a 1,200-bed teaching hospital with expertise in bariatric surgery. From January 2001 to August 2006, 27 morbidly obese patients (18 transferred from other institutions) developed severe postoperative IAS (within 45 days). Clinical signs, biochemical and radiologic findings, and treatment during the postoperative course after S0 were reviewed. Time to reoperation, characteristics of IAS, demographic data, and disease severity scores at ICU admission were recorded and their influence on prognosis was analyzed. RESULTS: The presence of respiratory signs after S0 led to an incorrect diagnosis in more than 50% of the patients. Preoperative weight (body mass index [BMI] > 50 kg/m2) and multiple reoperations were associated with a poorer prognosis in the ICU. The ICU mortality rate was 33% and increased with the number of organ failures at reoperation. CONCLUSION: During the initial postoperative course after bariatric surgery, physical examination of the abdomen is unreliable to identify surgical complications. The presence of respiratory signs should prompt abdominal investigations before the onset of organ failure. An urgent laparoscopy, as soon as abnormal clinical events are detected, is a valuable tool for early diagnosis and could shorten the delay in treatment.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): review of a new bariatric procedure and initial results.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and initial results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and review of the literature. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the initial ten patients who underwent LSG was performed. Study endpoints included operative time, complication rates, hospital length of stay, and percentage of excess body weight loss. RESULTS: This study included five women and five men, with a mean age of 43 (range: 31-52) years. Their mean preoperative weight was 182 kg (range: 125 kg-247 kg), with a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 64 (range: 61- 80). Indication for LSG was the importance of BMI in all patients. One patient had previous restrictive bariatric surgery. Mean operative time was two (range: 1.5-2.5) hours. No patients required conversion. No postoperative complications nor mortality were noted. The median hospital stay was 7.2 days. Average excess body weight loss and BMI at one year were 51% and 23 kg/m2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LSG can be integrated safely into a bariatric treatment program with good results in terms of weight loss and quality of life. LSG can be a first-step procedure before gastric bypass or duodenal switch, or a one-step restrictive procedure if long-term results are good. LSG should be considered as a surgical option in the bariatric field, but further studies are needed to determine its exact use.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes and initial results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were evaluated. METHODS: A prospective study of the initial 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was performed. Study endpoints included operative time, complication rates, hospital length of stay and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). RESULTS: There were 5 women and 5 men, with mean age 43 years (range 31 to 52). Mean preoperative weight was 182 kg (range 125-247 kg), with mean preoperative BMI 64 (range 61-80). Indication for LSG was related to BMI in all patients. 1 patient had previous restrictive bariatric surgery. Mean operative time was 2 hours (range 1.5-2.5). No patient required conversion. There were no postoperative complications nor mortality. Median hospital stay was 7.2 days. Average %EWL and BMI at 1 year were 51% and 23 kg/m2, respectively. CONCLUSION: LSG can be safely integrated into a bariatric surgical program with good results in terms of weight loss and quality of life. LSG can be a firststage procedure before gastric bypass or duodenal switch or a one-stage restrictive procedure if longterm results are good. LSG should be considered as a surgical option in the bariatric field.

Hepatic portal gas due to gastro-jejunal anastomotic leak after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Gastrointestinal complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) are not uncommon. Leakage of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis is the main early surgical complication of LRYGBP. Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) has been described in association with a variety of pathologic conditions. HPVG is a potentially life-threatening condition due to its etiology, with a global survival rate of <25%. We present a case of gastro-jejunal anastomotic leak associated with HPVG after LRYGBP.

Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the super-obese: a comparative study of 290 patients.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the best surgical treatment for super-obesity (BMI >50 kg/m2). The two most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). We undertook a retrospective single-center study to compare the safety and efficacy of these two operations in super-obese patients. METHODS: 290 super-obese patients underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery: 179 LAGB and 111 LRYGBP. RESULTS: There were one death in both groups. The early complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (10% vs 2.8%, P<0.01). Late complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (26% vs 15.3%, P<0.05). Operating time and hospital stay were significantly higher in the LRYGBP group. LRYGBP had significantly better excess weight loss than LAGB (63% vs 41% at 1 year, and 73% vs 46% at 2 years), as well as lower BMI than LAGB (35 vs 41 at 18 months). CONCLUSION: LRYGBP results in significantly greater weight loss than LAGB in super-obese patients, but is associated with a higher early complication rate.

Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) was evaluated. METHODS: From November 2000 to March 2004, all patients who underwent laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to LRYGBP were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure included adhesiolysis, resection of the previous band, creation of an isolated gastric pouch, 100-cm Roux-limb, side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy, and end-to-end gastro-jejunostomy. RESULTS: 70 patients (58 female, mean age 41) with a median BMI of 45+/-11 (27-81) underwent attempted laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to an RYGBP. Indications for conversion were insufficient weight loss or weight regain after band deflation for gastric pouch dilatation in 34 patients (49%), inadequate weight loss in 17 patients (25%), symptomatic proximal gastric pouch dilatation in 15 patients (20%), intragastric band migration in 3 patients (5%), and psychological band intolerance in 1 patient. 3 of 70 patients (4.3%) had to be converted to a laparotomy because of severe adhesions. Mean operative time was 240+/-40 SD min (210-280). Mean hospital length of stay was 7.2 days. Early complication rate was 14.3% (10/70). Late major complications occurred in 6 patients (8.6%). There was no mortality. Median excess body weight loss was 70+/-20%. 60% of patients achieved a BMI of <33 with mean follow-up 18 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to RYGBP is a technically challenging procedure that can be safely integrated into a bariatric treatment program with good results. Short-term weight loss is very good.

Obesity and diabetes as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ten percent of patients who undergo resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with chronic liver disease have no detectable cause for this underlying liver disease. Recent studies have shown that patients with cryptogenic chronic liver disease frequently have risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study examines the incidence of risk factors for NAFLD in patients with chronic liver disease who underwent resection for HCC. Among 210 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent resection for HCC, 18 (8.6%) had no identifiable cause for the underlying liver disease. These patients were assessed for obesity, diabetes mellitus, and histological features of the tumor and the adjacent liver parenchyma. Comparisons were made with matched patients with alcohol- and chronic-viral-hepatitis-related HCC. The prevalence of obesity (50% vs. 17% vs. 14%), diabetes (56% vs. 17% vs. 11%), aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio<1 (50% vs. 19% vs. 17%), and steatosis>20% (61% vs. 17% vs. 19%) was significantly higher in patients with cryptogenic liver disease than in patients with alcohol abuse and chronic viral hepatitis (P<0.0001 for each). Well-differentiated tumors were significantly more common in patients with cryptogenic liver disease (89% vs. 64% in patients with alcohol-related HCC vs. 55% in patients with chronic viral hepatitis-related HCC, P<0.0001). In conclusion, the hypothesis that obesity and diabetes mellitus may be important risk factors for cryptogenic chronic liver disease in patients with HCC is supported by the analysis of surgically treated patients. Whether HCC is primarily related to obesity and diabetes mellitus or secondarily to a NAFLD-like parenchymal lesions remains to be clarified.

Rhabdomyolysis after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative rhabdomyolysis is an uncommon event. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of rhabdomyolysis following laparoscopic obesity surgery. METHODS: Rhabdomyolysis was studied prospectively. Over a 6-month period, 66 consecutive patients underwent bariatric surgery (gastric banding (n=50) and gastric bypass (n=16)). All patients underwent laparoscopic procedures. A range of blood tests, including serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level and serum creatinine, were systematically performed before surgery, and on the first and third day postoperatively. Rhabdomyolysis was defined as a postoperative CPK level >1050 IU/L. RESULTS: Serum CPK was noted to increase significantly postoperatively to >1050 units in 3 patients (6%) in the adjustable banding group and 12 patients (75%) in the gastric bypass group (P <0.01). In the bypass group, 4 patients (25%) had a serum CPK level >10000 IU/L, but there were none in the gastric banding group. All patients with CPK level >10000 IU/L had BMI >60 kg/m(2). No patients experienced acute renal failure. CONCLUSION: Rhabdomyolysis occurred in 22.7 % of 66 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Risk factors were identified: massive obesity and long duration of the operation. Early diagnosis may have significant impact on outcome by preventing or reducing the severity of complications from rhabdomyolysis. CPK level should be performed systematically after obesity surgery.