Safety and efficacy of intralesional injection of enalapril versus triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids.

INTRODUCTION: Keloids are pathologic conditions characterized by fibroblast hyper-proliferation and excess collagen deposition. Enalapril, one of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, has recently been highlighted as a new therapeutic modality in treating keloids. This study evaluates the effectiveness of intralesional injection of enalapril versus triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) in keloids. METHODS: Forty patients with multiple keloids were enrolled in our study. Enalapril and TAA were injected intralesionally in one session per month for three sessions. The clinical outcomes were assessed via the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). RESULTS: In both groups, according to VSS and POSAS, there was a high statistically significant difference (p-value ≤ 0.01) before treatment, at the end of each session, and 3 months after treatment. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding degree of improvement. Patients treated with TAA developed more significant complications than those in the enalapril group (p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both enalapril and TAA had the same clinical effect. Enalapril could be a safe alternative to steroids in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Further studies on enalapril are needed on a large sample of patients with further focus on the mechanism of this innovative drug.

Comparative study between the effectiveness of plasma skin regeneration versus micro-needling in the treatment of striae distensae.

BACKGROUND: Striae distensae (SD) or stretch marks, a common condition causing significant cosmetic concern and distress, are linear dermal scars associated with epidermal atrophy that occur due to overstretching. Recently, micro-needling with dermapen is considered as one of the therapeutic modalities for SD. Also, plasma skin regeneration with plasma jet has been recommended as an effective method for the treatment of SD. AIM: The aim was to compare between the efficacy of both methods in the treatment of SD. METHODS: This study included 30 patients with striae distensae. Body was divided into two halves; one was treated with plasma jet for two sessions with 1 month interval and follow-up one month after the last session and the other half was treated with dermapen for four sessions with two weeks interval and follow-up one month after. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference (p- value >0.05) between dermapen and plasma jet procedures as regard to width, Total Atwal Score, Atwal score component, score of erythema, and skin texture after treatment. There was high statistically significant difference (p value <0.01) between dermapen and plasma jet as regards pain with higher values with plasma jet while there were statistical higher values concerning hyperpigmentation and erythema with dermapen. There was high statistically significant difference (p value <0.001) between width of striae before and after treatment with dermapen. CONCLUSIONS: Both lines of treatments are effective and promising therapeutic modalities for striae distensae with minimal side effects.