Training reactive balance using trips and slips in people with multiple sclerosis: A blinded randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the feasibility and efficacy of reactive balance training for improving stepping performance and reducing laboratory-induced falls in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Thirty people diagnosed with MS (18-70 years) participated in a blinded randomized controlled trial (ACTRN12618001436268). The intervention group (n = 14) underwent two 50-minute sessions (total 100 min) that exposed them to a total of 24 trips and 24 slips in mixed order, over one week. The control group (n = 16) received sham training (stepping over foam obstacles) with equivalent dosage. The primary outcome was falls into the harness (defined as >30% body weight) when exposed to trips and slips that were unpredictable in timing, location and type at post-assessment. Physical and psychological measures were also assessed at baseline and post assessments. RESULTS: The intervention and control groups completed 86% and 95% of the training protocols respectively. Incidence rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) of the intervention group relative to the control group were 0.57 (0.25, 1.26) for all falls, 0.80 (0.30, 2.11) for slip falls and 0.20 (0.04, 0.96) for trip falls in the laboratory. Kinematic analyses indicated the intervention participants improved dynamic stability, with higher centre of mass position and reduced trunk sway during recovery steps following a trip, compared to control. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control participants at post-assessment for other secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Reactive balance training improved trip-induced dynamic stability, limb support, trunk control and reduced falls in people with MS. More research is required to optimise the training protocol and determine whether the beneficial effects of reactive balance training can be retained long term and generalize to fewer daily-life falls.

Reactive balance responses to a trip and slip during gait in people with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: To examine reactive balance responses to a trip and slip during gait in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: This cross-sectional laboratory study involved 29 participants with MS (50.6 ± 13.4 years) and 29 gender-and-aged-matched healthy controls (50.9 ± 19.2 years). Falls following an induced trip and slip along a 10 m walkway, approach (e.g. gait speed, step length, foot contact angle) and recovery strategies (e.g. response time, extrapolated centre of mass position, margin of stability) were compared between the two groups. FINDINGS: The rate of falls was significantly higher in the participants with MS relative to healthy controls (rate ratio=2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.42, 5.61). Participants with MS also experienced more trip falls (odds ratio [OR]=3.90, 95% CI=1.16, 13.08) and more slip falls (OR=6.27, 95% CI=1.95, 20.22) than the heathy controls. Participants with MS had significantly slower gait speed, step length, cadence, and foot contact angle during approach (P < 0.05). Following slips, participants with MS had significantly greater stance limb knee flexion (P < 0.05), suggesting inadequate lower limb support to recover balance post-slip. Following trips, participants with MS had significantly delayed response initiation, lower toe clearance, shorter step length, and greater trunk sway (P < 0.05). Fewer participants with MS showed a hopping response to clear the obstacle (P < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Multiple sclerosis impairs reactive balance responses to a trip and slip associated with reduced lower limb function and delayed postural responses. Neurorehabilitation targeting reactive balance may facilitate fall prevention in people with multiple sclerosis.

NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND ACHIEVABLE DOSES FOR STANDARD CT EXAMINATIONS IN SUDAN.

Radiation doses were determined to propose national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) for computed tomography (CT) examinations in Sudan. Doses were estimated from retrospectively collected scan parameters for 1336 CT examinations of adult patients from 14 Sudanese hospitals using CT Expo 2.5 software. ADs and NDRLs were set at the 50th and 75th percentile of the hospital median dose distribution, respectively. The proposed CTDIvol (mGy) ADs ranged from: 10 (chest) to 64 (head), and that of the dose-length product (DLP; mGy.cm) ranged from 366 (chest) to 1225 (head). The proposed CTDIvol (mGy) NDRLs ranged from 15 kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) to 79 (head), whereas that of the DLP (mGy.cm) ranged from 690 (chest) to 1490 (head). Current doses fell within the upper range of the doses presented in the literature emphasizing the need for implementation of the current ADs and NDRLs for CT to enhance patient protection and dose optimization in Sudan.

Reactive Balance Adaptability and Retention in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aim. To compare reactive balance in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with healthy controls and to examine the ability of people with MS to adapt their reactive balance and retain training effects. Data Sources. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO) and reference lists of included articles from inception to February 25, 2019. Study Selection. Case-control and intervention studies that assessed reactive balance using mechanical perturbations in people with a confirmed diagnosis of MS. Results. Meta-analyses of 9 studies (n = 342) showed that people with MS have significantly worse reactive balance than healthy controls (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.78, 95% CI 0.44-1.11, P < .0001, I2 = 47%). Specifically, people with MS have greater center of mass displacements (SMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.05-0.77, P = .02, I2 = 9%) and longer response times (MD (ms) 31.45, 95% CI 19.91-42.98, P < .0001, I2 = 75%) in response to standing perturbations than healthy controls. Subsequent meta-analyses revealed training comprising repeated exposure to perturbations improved response times (P < .001) and training effects on response times could be retained for 24 hours (P < .001) in people with MS. Conclusions. Reactive balance assessments can highlight functional impairments related to falls in people with MS, and perturbation training can acutely improve reactive balance control and such improvements can be retained for 24 hours in this population. Systematic review registration number: CRD42019126130.