RESUMO
AIM: Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a rhythm recording device, for detection of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) and atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to 12-lead-electrocardiogram (12-L-ECG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred 12-L-ECGs (reference standard) and Coala Heart Monitor (CHM) recordings (index test) were collected from 189 patients. Two electrophysiologists independently performed manual analysis of all 12-L-ECGs and CHM recordings in random order. The CHM recordings were also analyzed by an automatic algorithm and compared to the results of the reference standard. RESULTS: Manual analysis of CHM for ATA showed a sensitivity of 98.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 94.0-100) and a specificity of 100% (CI: 96.6-100). Manual analysis for AF had a sensitivity of 100% (CI: 95.3-100) and a specificity of 97.5% (CI: 93.0-99.5). Automatic analysis for ATA showed a sensitivity of 93.5% (CI: 86.3-97.6) and a specificity of 92.6% (CI: 85.9-96.7). Automatic analysis for AF showed a sensitivity of 97.4% (CI: 91.0-99.7) and a specificity of 86.1% (CI: 78.6-91.7). CONCLUSION: CHM has a very high accuracy for ATA and AF in manual analysis and a high accuracy for ATA and AF in automatic analysis, making the device suitable for screening.
