Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2400171, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991182

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer has emerged as a significant public health challenge in the Middle East, characterized by rising incidence rates and a concerning mortality-to-incidence ratio. Yet, despite these alarming trends, data regarding prostate cancer awareness in the region remain limited. To address this critical knowledge gap, this study investigates prostate cancer awareness within the Middle East. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed among 5,913 men age 40 years and older across 14 Middle Eastern countries between January 1, 2022, and July 31, 2023. Excluding those with a history of prostate cancer, a validated questionnaire assessed prostate cancer awareness. Data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, medians and ranges for continuous variables, and Pearson chi-square analysis for relationships between education levels and awareness of prostate cancer. RESULTS: The survey achieved a 74.9% response rate, with 4,431 male participants. Regarding prostate cancer awareness, 83.8% of participants had heard of the disease. However, only 31.0% correctly identified it as the most common malignancy in men, and 21.8% believed it affects both sex. Awareness of screening was limited, with just 19.1% recognizing the prostate-specific antigen test's role. Additionally, participants had a pessimistic view, with a mean perception that 75% of patients with prostate cancer die from the disease, rather than from other causes. Higher education levels were associated with significantly increased awareness of prostate cancer (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study reveals that while general awareness of the disease exists, crucial knowledge deficits regarding risk factors, screening, and prognosis are evident. Addressing these knowledge gaps through culturally tailored education may improve early detection rates, treatment outcomes, and ultimately reduce the burden of prostate cancer in the Middle East.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Oriente Médio/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia
2.
J Neurooncol ; 167(2): 295-303, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383875

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors and the role of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as a re-irradiation technique in the management of progressive glioblastoma. METHODS: The records of 77 previously irradiated glioblastoma patients who progressed and received second course hypofractionated SRT (1-5 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 in our department were evaluated retrospectively. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: The median time to progression from the end of initial radiotherapy was 14 months (range, 6-68 months). The most common SRT schedule was 30 Gy (range, 18-50 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up after SRT was 9 months (range, 3-80 months). One-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates after SRT were 46% and 35%, respectively. Re-irradiation dose and the presence of pseudoprogression were both significant independent positive prognostic factors for both OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04, respectively). For PFS, progression-free interval > 14 months was also a prognostic factor (p = 0.04). The treatment was well tolerated without significant acute toxicity. During follow-up, radiation necrosis was observed in 17 patients (22%), and 14 (82%) of them were asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated SRT is an effective treatment approach for patients with progressive glioblastoma. Younger patients who progressed later than 14 months, received higher SRT doses, and experienced pseudoprogression following SRT had improved survival rates.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Radiocirurgia , Reirradiação , Humanos , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Radiocirurgia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...