The impact of loco-regional treatment modality on the outcomes in breast cancer patients younger than forty years of age.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of the loco-regional treatment modality, on the loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. METHODS: Data of 623 breast cancer patients younger than 40 years of age were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to the locoregional treatment approach into three groups: the mastectomy group (M), the mastectomy followed by radiation therapy group (MRX) and the breast conservative therapy group (BCT). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 72 months (range, 6-180). Two hundred and nine patients were treated with BCT, 86 with MRM and 328 with MRX. The 10-year rate LRR rates according to treatment modality were: 13.4% for BCT, 15.1% for MRM and 8.5% for MRX (p 0.106). On univariate analysis, T stage (p 0.009), AJCC stage (p 0.047) and Her 2 status (p 0.001) were associated with LRR. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 72.7% (78.5% in the BCT group, 69.8% in the MRM group and 69.8% in the MRX group, p 0.072). On Univariate analysis, age < 35 (p 0.032), grade III (p 0.001), N3 stage (p 0.001), AJCC stage III (p 0.005), ER negative status (0.04), Her 2-status positive (0.006) and lack of chemotherapy administration (p 0.02) were all predictors of increased mortality. CONCLUSION: For patients younger than 40 years of age, similar LRR and overall survival outcomes were achieved using BCT, M or MRX. Young age at diagnosis should not be used alone in recommending one loco-regional treatment approach over the others.

Local and distant brain control in melanoma and NSCLC brain metastases with concurrent radiosurgery and immune checkpoint inhibition.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has become more common in recent years, but there is a lack of prospective data on cancer control outcomes when these therapies are administered concurrently. METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma brain metastases treated with SRS at a single institution from May 2008 to January 2017. A parametric proportional hazard model is used to detect the effect of concurrent ICI within 30, 60, or 90 days of ICI administration on local control and distant in-brain control. Other patient and lesion characteristics are treated as covariates and adjusted in the regression. A frailty term is added in the baseline hazard to capture the within-patient correlation. RESULTS: We identified 144 patients with 477 total lesions, including 95 NSCLC patients (66.0%), and 49 (34.0%) melanoma patients. On multivariate analysis, concurrent SRS and ICI (SRS within 30 days of ICI administration) was not associated with local control but was associated with distant brain control. When controlling for prior treatment to lesion, number of lesions, and presence of extracranial metastases, patients receiving this combination had a statistically significant decrease in distant brain failure compared to patients that received non-concurrent ICI or no ICI (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.05-0.47, p = 0.0011). CONCLUSION: Concurrent ICI can enhance the efficacy of SRS. Prospective studies would allow for stronger evidence to support the impact of concurrent SRS and ICI on disease outcomes.