Health-related quality of life after 12 months post discharge in patients hospitalised with COVID-19-related severe acute respiratory infection (SARI): a prospective analysis of SF-36 data and correlation with retrospective admission data on age, disease severity, and frailty.

Long-term outcome and 'health-related quality of life' (HRQoL) following hospitalisation for COVID-19-related severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of HRQoL in patients hospitalised with COVID-19-related SARI at 1 year post discharge, focusing on the potential impact of age, frailty, and disease severity. METHOD: Routinely collected outcome data on 1207 patients admitted with confirmed COVID-19 related SARI across all three secondary care sites in our NHS trust over 3 months were assessed in this retrospective cohort study. Of those surviving 1 year, we prospectively collected 36-item short form (SF-36) HRQoL questionnaires, comparing three age groups (<49, 49-69, and the over 69-year-olds), the relative impact of frailty (using the Clinical Frailty Score; CFS), and disease severity (using National Early Warning Score; NEWS) on HRQoL domains. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 46.5% in admitted patients. In our SF-36 cohort (n=169), there was a significant reduction in all HRQoL domains versus normative data; the most significant reductions were in the physical component (p<0.001) across all ages and the emotional component (p<0.01) in the 49-69 year age group, with age having no additional impact on HRQoL. However, there was a significant correlation between physical well-being versus CFS (the correlation coefficient=-0.37, p<0.05), though not NEWS, with no gender difference observed. CONCLUSION: There was a significant reduction in all SF-36 domains at 1 year. Poor CFS at admission was associated with a significant and prolonged impact on physical parameters at 1 year. Age had little impact on the severity of HRQoL, except in the domains of physical functioning and the overall physical component.

Comparison of xpert MTB/RIF assay, line probe assay, and culture in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis on bronchoscopic specimen.

Background: In patients unable to expectorate good quality sputum or with minimal to none sputum production, bronchoscopic specimens may be collected. The objective of the study is to determine the use of Xpert MTB/RIF assay and line probe assay (LPA) in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) using specimens collected by bronchoscopy in a tertiary care center. Methods: Bronchoscopy specimens received in the TB laboratory were processed by microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, LPA, and mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture. Results of MGIT culture are considered gold standard. Results: Of the 173 specimens tested, MTB was detected in 48 (27.74%) samples by any of the above methods. Positivity in bronchoalveolar lavage was 31.4% (44/140) and in bronchial wash was 12.1% (4/33). Detection by microscopy, Xpert assay, and culture was 20 (11.56%), 45 (26.01%), and 38 (21.96%), respectively. Culture detected MTB in three additional specimens compared to Xpert assay. Xpert assay detected MTB in 45 (26%) specimens which include 10 specimens which were negative by culture. LPA detected MTB in 18 (90%) out of 20 smear-positive specimens. RIF resistance was detected in 20 (41.7%) specimens by Xpert and/or MGIT culture drug susceptibility testing (DST). Isoniazid (INH) resistance was detected in 19 specimens by LPA and MGIT culture DST. Conclusion: Bronchoscopy can provide alternative respiratory specimens for diagnosing PTB in patients with difficulty to expectorate sputum. The utility of Xpert MTB/RIF as a rapid, sensitive, and specific test should always be supplemented with culture in difficult-to-obtain and precious respiratory specimens. LPA plays an important role in rapid detection of INH monoresistance.