Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 28(3): 366-70, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24758344

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of induced and spontaneous labor in grand multiparous women with one previous lower segment cesarean section (CS), so that the safety of labor induction could be assessed. METHODS: In 102 women (study group), labor was induced and the outcome was compared with 280 women (control group) who went into spontaneous labor. All 382 women were grand multiparous and had one previous CS. RESULTS: There were no significant difference in oxytocin augmentation, CS, scar dehiscence, fetal birth weight or apgar scores between groups. There was one neonatal death, two still births, one early neonatal death and one congenital malformation in the study group and this was not significant. There was no significant difference in vaginal birth in the study (80.9%) and the control group (83.8%). CONCLUSION: In this moderate-sized study, induction of labor may be a safe option in grand multiparous women, if there is no absolute induction for repeating CS.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/métodos , Paridade , Resultado da Gravidez , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea , Dinoprostona/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Kuweit , Trabalho de Parto , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...