Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urolithiasis ; 49(6): 533-541, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33961080

RESUMO

Several studies have reported associations between vascular calcifications and urinary stone disease (USD). However, results have been inconsistent and the majority of studies did not report on race/ethnicity. We examined the association between vascular calcifications and USD in a large, racially/ethnically diverse patient population. We identified 672 USD cases and 672 controls (i.e., patients without a history of USD) from patients who underwent non-contrast CT imaging at Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, New York between 2004 and 2013. Controls were matched to cases on age, sex and race/ethnicity. The non-contrast CT imaging was used to measure abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and calculate the AAC severity score. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations of AAC presence and severity score with risks of USD and stone types. Cases and controls had similar AAC prevalence (45.2% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.87), and AAC severity score (median 10 vs. 9.3, p = 0.47). The presence of AAC (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.78-1.23; p = 0.86) or AAC severity score were not associated with risk of USD: ORs of 0.96, 0.87, 1.07 and 1.03 for increasing AAC quartiles (p-trend = 0.54). There were also no associations in the stratified analyses by race/ethnicity or by sex. However, when USD patients were stratified by stone type, brushite/apatite stone formers had an inverse association with the lowest quartile of AAC severity score (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.11-0.84, p = 0.04) in comparison to patients without AAC. Overall, we found no association between vascular calcifications and risk of urinary stone disease in this large, hospital-based, case-control study.


Assuntos
Cálculos Urinários , Calcificação Vascular , Aorta Abdominal , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/epidemiologia
2.
Urol Oncol ; 38(10): 794.e11-794.e16, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32307329

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Increased adrenergic innervation is observed in prostate cancer (CaP) and is associated with aggressive disease. Emerging evidence suggests that beta-adrenergic blockade inhibits CaP progression. However, the association between type of beta-blocker use and risk of incident CaP on initial prostate biopsy has not been investigated in multiethnic populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of racially/ethnically diverse men (64% African-American and Hispanic), who underwent initial prostate biopsy between 2006 and 2016 in a large healthcare system was performed. Oral use of beta-blocker type was assessed by reviewing active prescriptions within the 5-year period preceding initial biopsy. Patient demographics and clinical factors were collected. RESULTS: Of 4,607 men who underwent initial prostate biopsy, 4,516 met criteria and 2,128 had a biopsy positive for CaP; 20% high-risk, 41% intermediate-risk, and 39% low or very-low risk (National Comprehensive Cancer Network classification). Overall, 15% of patients were taking a beta-blocker prior to initial biopsy, with Metoprolol, Atenolol, and Carvedilol accounting for the majority. Of beta-blocker types, Atenolol alone was associated with a 38% reduction in odds of incident CaP (P= 0.01), with a 40% and 54% reduction in risks of National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate and high-risk CaP (P = 0.03 and P = 0.03, respectively) compared to men not taking a beta-blocker. Furthermore, longer duration of Atenolol use (3-5 years) was associated with a 54% and 72% reduction in intermediate and high-risk disease, (P = 0.03 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among beta blocker types, long-term Atenolol use is associated with a significant reduction in incident CaP risk on initial prostate biopsy for clinically-significant intermediate and high-risk disease compared to men not taking a beta-blocker.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Idoso , Atenolol/uso terapêutico , Carvedilol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Masculino , Metoprolol/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Proteção , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
3.
Urolithiasis ; 48(3): 217-225, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31025079

RESUMO

To determine whether patients with ureteral stones received different standard of care in the emergency department (ED) according to various sociodemographic factors. We conducted a retrospective study of patients presenting to EDs in a large tertiary-care hospital in the Bronx, New York with a diagnosis of ureteral stones. Electronic chart review was used to assess each patient's ED course and to gather socio-demographic information. The primary outcomes of interest were administration of pain medication, prescription of alpha-1 antagonists to facilitate stone passage, and whether or not patients received CT scan or ultrasound. Associations of these outcomes with age categories, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI category, socioeconomic status and insurance status were examined using multivariate logistic regression models. 1200 patients were included in this analysis of which 616 (51%) were women. A large proportion of patients were minorities: 40% Hispanic, 15% non-Hispanic Black, and 20% other/multiracial. Patients aged 55-64 years and those 65 or older were less likely to receive pain medication compared to patients < 35 years (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86, p = 0.01 and OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-1.00, p = 0.05, respectively). Women were less likely than men to undergo any form of diagnostic imaging (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.76, p = 0.001). Similarly, patients in the lowest quintile of SES received less imaging than patients in the highest SES group (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.90, p = 0.02). Finally, women were less likely to receive alpha blockade compared to men (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.92, p = 0.014). Multiple disparities exist among patients presenting to the emergency department for ureteral stones.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cálculos Urinários/diagnóstico , Cálculos Urinários/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...