Effect of synbiotic supplementation on layer production and cecal Salmonella load during a Salmonella challenge.

This study analyzed the inhibitory effects of a synbiotic product (PoultryStar® me) on production parameters, intestinal microflora profile, and immune parameters in laying hens with and without a Salmonella challenge. The synbiotic product contained 4 probiotic bacterial strains (Lactobacillus reuteri, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Pediococcus acidilactici) and a prebiotic fructooligosaccharide. Layers were supplemented with the synbiotic from d of hatch to 28 wk of age. At 16 wk of age, birds were either vaccinated with Salmonella enterica Enteritidis (SE) vaccine or left unvaccinated. At 24 wk of age, a portion of the birds was challenged with 1 × 109 CFU of SE or left unchallenged, resulting in a 3 (vaccinated, challenged, or both vaccinated and challenged) X 2 (control and synbiotics) factorial arrangement of treatments. At 18 and 20 wk of age, birds fed synbiotics in both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups had increased (P < 0.05) BW more than those in the un-supplemented groups. Birds fed synbiotics had 0.7, 17.8, 21.7, 3, and 4.2% higher (P < 0.05) hen d egg production (HDEP) at 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 wk of age, compared to the birds without supplementation, respectively. After administering the SE challenge, supplemented birds had 3, 6.7, 4.3, 12.5, and 14.4% higher (P < 0.05) HDEP at 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 wk of age, compared to the birds not supplemented, respectively. Irrespective of the vaccination status, birds fed synbiotics and challenged with SE had a lower (P < 0.05) SE cecal load compared to the un-supplemented groups. At 22 d post Salmonella challenge, birds supplemented, vaccinated, and challenged had the highest bile IgA content. It can be concluded that supplementation of the synbiotic product could be beneficial to layer diets as a growth promoter, performance enhancer, and for protection against SE infection.

Probiotic form effects on growth performance, digestive function, and immune related biomarkers in broilers.

The aim of this work was to assess the effect of dietary viable or heat inactivated probiotic forms (PF) combined or not with avilamycin (AV) used as a growth promoter, on broiler growth performance, nutrient digestibility, digestive enzyme activities, and expression of immune response related genes.Depending on the type of PF (i.e., no addition, viable, inactivated) and AV addition (no/yes), 450 one-day-old Cobb male broilers were allocated in the following 6 treatments according to a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement with 5 replicates of 15 broilers each for 6 wk: CoN: diet without any addition; CoN+A: combination of CoN with AV; ViP: viable PF - no AV; ViP+A: combination of ViP with AV; InP: inactivated PF - no AV; InP+A: combination of InP with AV.There were no interactions (P > 0.05) for overall performance parameters. In contrast, PF or AV addition improved BW gain (PPF= 0.015; PAV < 0.001), FCR (PPF < 0.001; PAV < 0.001) and production efficiency factor (PPF= 0.001; PAV= 0.001).Significant (PPF×AV ≤ 0.05) interaction effects regarding ileal digestibility (IAD) of DM and total tract apparent digestibility (TTAD) of DM and ether extracts (EE) were noted. In addition, PF affected IAD and TTAD of CP (PPF < 0.001, PPF= 0.004, respectively). Inactivated PF increased (PPR= 0.024) lipase activity in jejunal digesta.At spleen level InP and ViP+A down-regulated TGF-ß4 (PPF × AV = 0.035) compared to CoN and ViP, whereas ViP+A up-regulated iNOS (PPF × AV = 0.022). An anti-inflammatory effect of live and inactive PF and/or AV addition at cecal tonsils was shown by iNOS down-regulation (PPF × AV= 0.015) compared to CoN. Furthermore, AV down-regulated IFN-γ (PAV= 0.002).In conclusion, viable probiotic, as well as inactivated probiotic alone or in combination with avilamycin, improved nutrient digestibility. All dietary additives affected growth performance positively and induced an anti-inflammatory response at cecal level.

Assessment of probiotics supplementation via feed or water on the growth performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens after experimental infection with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella.

In this study, the effect of probiotic supplementation via drinking water or feed on the performance of broiler chickens experimentally infected with sporulated oocysts of Eimeria acervulina (5 × 10(4)), Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella (2 × 10(4) each one) at 14 days of age was evaluated. Two hundred and forty 1-day-old Ross 308 male chicks were separated into eight equal groups with three replicates. Two of the groups, one infected with mixed Eimeria oocysts and the other not, were given a basal diet and served as controls. The remaining groups were also challenged with mixed Eimeria species and received the basal diet and either water supplemented with probiotic (three groups) or probiotic via feed (two groups); the probiotic used consisted of Enterococcus faecium #589, Bifidobacterium animalis #503 and Lactobacillus salivarius #505 at a ratio of 6:3:1. Probiotic supplementation was applied either via drinking water in different inclusion rates (groups W1, W2 and W3) or via feed using uncoated (group FN) or coated strains (group FC). The last group was given the basal diet supplemented with the anticoccidial lasalocid at 75 mg/kg. Each experimental group was given the corresponding diet or drinking water from day 1 to day 42 of age. Throughout the experimental period of 42 days, body weight and feed intake were recorded weekly and feed conversion ratios were calculated. Seven days after infection, the infected control group presented the lowest weight gain values, while probiotics supplied via feed supported growth to a comparable level with that of the lasalocid group. Probiotic groups presented lesion score values and oocyst numbers that were lower than in control infected birds but higher than in the lasalocid group. In the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, the highest villous height values were presented by probiotic groups. In conclusion, a mixture of probiotic substances gave considerable improvement in both growth performance and intestinal health in comparison with infected control birds and fairly similar improvement to an approved anticoccidial during a mixed Eimeria infection.

Evaluating the efficacy of an avian-specific probiotic to reduce the colonization of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens.

Campylobacteriosis is the most frequent zoonotic disease in humans worldwide, and the contaminated poultry meat by Campylobacter jejuni can be considered one of the important sources of enteric infections in humans. The use of probiotics, which can help to improve the natural defense of animals against pathogenic bacteria, is an alternative and effective approach to antibiotic administration for livestock to reduce bacterial contamination. In vitro experiments showed that Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Lactobacillus salivarius, and Lactobacillus reuteri isolated from healthy chicken gut inhibited the growth of C. jejuni. To demonstrate this effect in vivo, 1-d-old broiler chicks received 2 mg/bird per day of a multispecies probiotic product via the drinking water. Controls received no probiotic treatment, and all chicks were infected with C. jejuni orally. Results showed that the cecal colonization by C. jejuni was significantly reduced by probiotic treatment at both 8 and 15 d postchallenge. To confirm this effect, in a second in vivo experiment, 1-d-old broiler chicks received the same dose of the same probiotic via the drinking water and controls received no probiotic, and all chicks were infected with C. jejuni orally. Similarly, probiotic treatment reduced (P=0.001) cecal colonization by C. jejuni at both 8 and 15 d postchallenge. The results of our in vivo experiments conclude that probiotic administration reduced the colonization of C. jejuni in broiler chickens.

Evaluation of probiotic administration on the immune response of coccidiosis-vaccinated broilers.

Probiotics are nonpathogenic bacteria that can promote bird health by reducing pathogen colonization. Researchers have previously demonstrated that the avian immune response can be modulated with probiotics, which may provide a mechanism for the reported reductions in pathogens. We examined phagocyte oxidative burst and cell proliferation of vaccinated broilers administered probiotics. We hypothesized that the combination of probiotic bacteria and a vaccine would affect immune function. Two studies were conducted to evaluate this interaction in broilers. Treatments consisted of a negative control, probiotic, vaccine, or a probiotic + vaccine. Peripheral blood was collected on d 7, 14, and 21 of age. Heterophils and monocytes were evaluated for oxidative burst and lymphocytes were assayed for proliferation. In study 1, heterophil oxidative burst was higher (P ≤ 0.05) in each treatment that received probiotic on d 14 when compared with the negative control. On d 21, an enhanced (P ≤ 0.05) heterophil oxidative burst was observed in the probiotic treatment when compared with the other treatments. On d 14, monocyte oxidative burst was greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the probiotic + vaccine treatment when compared with all other treatments. An increase (P ≤ 0.05) in lymphocyte proliferation was observed among all treatments on d 7 when compared with the negative control. Both vaccine treatments had significant lymphocyte proliferation on d 14 when compared with the negative control. In study 2, the probiotic treatment was associated with greater levels in heterophil oxidative burst on d 7 when compared with all other treatments. On d 21, an increase (P ≤ 0.05) in heterophil oxidative burst was seen in the vaccine treatment when compared with the negative control. On d 7, increased (P ≤ 0.05) monocyte oxidative burst was observed in the vaccine treatment when compared with the negative control. No significant differences were observed in lymphocyte proliferation in any of the treatment groups. These data suggest that probiotics can modulate the immune response and may play a role in vaccination.

Net effect of an acute phase response--partial alleviation with probiotic supplementation.

The acute phase response (APR) is characterized by inflammation, fever, and altered organ metabolism resulting in muscle catabolism and anorexia. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced APR may reflect depressed growth and appetite loss. Therefore, a 1-wk growth experiment was conducted to examine whether dietary supplementation of a multispecies probiotic (PoultryStar) would alleviate growth suppression and anorexia caused by LPS-induced APR. The experiment was designed with 4 treatments (n = 8 cages/treatment; 6 birds/cage) starting at 14 d of age. Before (0 to 14 d of age) and for the experiment (14 to 21 d of age), male broiler chicks were fed diets devoid of probiotic or were supplemented with 1.7 x 10(8) cfu/kg of probiotic. At 14 d of age, birds fed the diet devoid of probiotic were further divided into 3 treatments: an unchallenged positive control, LPS-challenged negative control (LPS-NC), and a treatment that was pair-fed to LPS-NC. The probiotic-fed birds were also then challenged with LPS. The LPS (Escherichia coli 055:B5) was injected intraperitoneally 4 times at 48-h intervals at 1 mg/kg of BW. The LPS challenge dramatically depressed BW gain from 14 to 21 d of age by 22% (P < 0.001). However, 41% of growth depression was attributable to factors other than feed intake reduction when compared with the pair-fed treatment. Probiotic supplementation recovered 17% of depressed growth (vs. LPS-NC; P = 0.068), but this improved growth was not due to improvements in feed intake (P = 0.47). However, recovery of feed intake of the probiotic + LPS birds occurred 48-h earlier than the LPS-NC birds. Growth depression induced by LPS administration resulted in an overall relative feed intake (vs. positive control) of 0.83 and also decreased net energy and protein accretion. Probiotic supplementation did not alleviate the reduction in net energy or protein accretion induced by LPS. In conclusion, APR (induced by LPS administration) diverted a large portion of consumed nutrients from tissue accretion. Probiotic supplementation lessened the anorexic effects of LPS resulting in a trend toward BW gain improvement versus the LPS-NC.

Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition.

The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of inclusion levels of a 5-bacterial species probiotic in broiler nutrition. Five hundred twenty-five 1-d-old male Cobb broilers were allocated in 5 experimental treatments for 6 wk. The experimental treatments received a corn-soybean coccidiostat-free basal diet and depending on the addition were labeled as follows: no addition (C), 10(8) cfu probiotic/kg of diet (P1), 10(9) cfu probiotic/kg of diet (P2), 10(10) cfu probiotic/kg of diet (P3), and 2.5 mg of avilamycin/kg of diet (A). Each treatment had 3 replicates of 35 broilers each. Treatment effects on broiler growth performance and biomarkers such as ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility, plasma Ig concentration, and cecal microflora composition were determined. Differences among treatments were considered significant when P < or = 0.05. Overall BW gain was significantly higher in treatment P1 (2,293 g) compared with P2 (2,163 g), C (2,165 g), and P3 (2,167 g), with A (2,230 g) being intermediate and not different from P1. Overall feed conversion ratio values were similar and significantly better for P1 (1.80) and A (1.80) compared with P2 (1.87), C (1.89), and P3 (1.92). Ileal apparent digestibility coefficients (ADC) of CP and ether extract were higher in A. Generally, treatments A and P1 showed an improved total tract ADC for DM, organic matter, ash, ether extract, and AME(n) values. The total tract ADC of CP was higher in P1, C, and P2. There were no differences between treatments regarding plasma Ig in 14- and 42-d-old broilers. Treatments P2 and P3 were effective at beneficially modulating cecal microflora composition. In particular, the lower cecal coliform concentration (log cfu/g of wet digesta) was seen in P2 (6.12) and P3 (4.90) in 14- and 42-d-old broilers, respectively, whereas at 42 d, P3 and P2 had the highest Bifidobacterium (8.31; 8.08) and Lactobacillus concentrations (8.20; 7.86), respectively. It is concluded that probiotic inclusion level had a significant effect on broiler growth responses, nutrient ADC, AME(n), and cecal microflora composition.

Investigation of different yeast strains for the detoxification of ochratoxin A.

High concentrations of ochratoxin A (OTA) in feed lead to growth depression in animals. It has been reported that binders can be used for deactivating aflatoxins but not for other mycotoxins without negatively influencing the animals health. In this study a strain from the genus ofTrichosporon with the ability to cleave ochratoxin A very selectively into phenylalanine and the non-toxic ochratoxin α (OTα) could be isolated. This strain was selected from a pool of OTA detoxifying microorganism by carrying out several investigations.Trichosporon sp. nov. can be fermented and stabilized. In a feeding trial with broilers lyophilizedTrichosporon-cells could compensate performance losses caused by OTA.