Step-by-step decision-making process in third party assisted reproduction: a qualitative study.

This study explores the experience of decision-making about the third party assisted reproduction in Iranian infertile patients using a qualitative approach. Data were collected in 2017-2019 through in-depth interviews of 20 infertile participants (3 couples and 14 individuals) who became pregnant or had children through third-party reproduction and 12 specialists. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, the data were managed using the MAXQDA 10 and analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. The main category that emerged was 'step-by-step process of adjustment to third party assisted reproduction'. From this, five sub-categories were extracted: (i) 'parental preference for biological children over non-biological children'; (ii) 'parental preference for non-biological children over childlessness threats'; (iii) 'strong preference for having partial genetic link with children'; (iv) 'flexibility in removing or overcoming barriers to third party reproduction'; and (v) 'parental preference for adopted children over childlessness'. The findings in the present study suggest the importance of lineage and biological relatedness in Iranian culture. Patients adjusted to non-biological parenting as a treatment option only if they have to. Using a step-by-step decision-making process helped participants make more thoughtful decisions by organising relevant information and defining alternatives. The results of the present study can help healthcare providers with counselling regarding parenting with or without genetic ties.

The Impact of Third Party Reproduction on Family and Kinship.

The development of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the UK, in 1978, proved a major breakthrough in the process of human reproduction, which had remained constant in human history. The impact of IVF and the ensuing assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has not been limited in revolutionizing the "natural" practice of biological reproduction, but has reached out to and affected almost every institution in society. Family and kinship, as the social expression of reproduction and the institutions which are the most transparently structured realm of human life are those most profoundly affected by ARTs. Although literature on the implications of ARTs is in general abundant, this article presents new insights on their impact on family and kinship in Iran, which remains a unique case in the Muslim world. It explores the particular way ARTs, especially third-party donation, have been endorsed and practiced in Iran, and their consequences for the family, the infertile individuals, and their position vis-à-vis their kin and social group. The conclusion points to the lack of clarity concerning the initial rulings by the Islamic jurists, who allowed the practice of ARTs, and which has led to a number of unintended consequences regarding the legal, religious, cultural, and ethical issues, affecting the family, its structure and the relationship between the kin group. These consequences range, inter alia, from the question of the anonymity of third-party donor, to the permissibility of gamete donation between blood relatives, and to the absence of enforceable legislation.