Direct interaction between the Arabidopsis disease resistance signaling proteins, EDS1 and PAD4.

The Arabidopsis EDS1 and PAD4 genes encode lipase-like proteins that function in resistance (R) gene-mediated and basal plant disease resistance. Phenotypic analysis of eds1 and pad4 null mutants shows that EDS1 and PAD4 are required for resistance conditioned by the same spectrum of R genes but fulfil distinct roles within the defence pathway. EDS1 is essential for elaboration of the plant hypersensitive response, whereas EDS1 and PAD4 are both required for accumulation of the plant defence-potentiating molecule, salicylic acid. EDS1 is necessary for pathogen-induced PAD4 mRNA accumulation, whereas mutations in PAD4 or depletion of salicylic acid only partially compromise EDS1 expression. Yeast two-hybrid analysis reveals that EDS1 can dimerize and interact with PAD4. However, EDS1 dimerization is mediated by different domains to those involved in EDS1-PAD4 association. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that EDS1 and PAD4 proteins interact in healthy and pathogen-challenged plant cells. We propose two functions for EDS1. The first is required early in plant defence, independently of PAD4. The second recruits PAD4 in the amplification of defences, possibly by direct EDS1-PAD4 association.

Genetic analysis of plant disease resistance pathways.

Plant disease resistance (R) genes are introduced into high yielding crop varieties to improve resistance to agronomically important pathogens. The R gene-encoded proteins are recognitionally specific, interacting directly or indirectly with corresponding pathogen avirulence (avr) determinants, and are therefore under strong diversifying selection pressure to evolve new recognition capabilities. Genetic analyses in different plant species have also revealed more broadly recruited resistance signalling genes that provide further targets for manipulation in crop improvement strategies. Understanding the processes that regulate both plant-pathogen recognition and the induction of appropriate defences should provide fresh perspectives in combating plant disease. Many recent studies have utilized the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. Here, mutational screens have identified genes that are required for R gene function and for restriction of pathogen growth in compatible plant-pathogen interactions. Genetic analyses of these plant mutants suggest that whilst signalling pathways are conditioned by particular R protein structural types they are also influenced by pathogen lifestyle. Two Arabidopsis defence signalling genes, EDS1 and PAD4, are required for the accumulation of salicylic acid, a phenolic molecule required for systemic immunity. The cloning, molecular and biochemical characterization of these components suggests processes that may be important in their disease resistance signalling roles.

The effect of altered codon usage on luciferase activity in tobacco, maize and wheat.

A comparison of the wild-type firefly luciferase reporter gene to a codon-modified gene, available from Promega, demonstrates that in tobacco cell cultures, an increase in G+C content of 1.8%, as a consequence of 36 A/T→G/C synonymous codon alterations and removal of the lysosomal targeting sequence, has no significant effect on expression. In maize Black Mexican Sweet cells and wheat scutellum, increases in activity of 14- to 23-fold and 53- to 59-fold, respectively, are obtained using the codon-modified luciferase with the UBI1 promoter and its leader intron. The observed increase in luc+ expression is most likely a consequence of differences in codon usage reflecting tRNA abundance rather than an increase in the efficiency of intron splicing resulting from the small increase in the G+C content of the coding sequence. This difference in light emission between the wild-type and codon-modified luciferases can be clearly visualised in a low-light imaging camera, making the latter a much more sensitive and useful reporter gene for detecting luciferase activity in vivo.