The Role of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Minimally Invasive Colorectal Resections for Cancer.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to describe the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of leaks occurring after minimally invasive colorectal resections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four of 566 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive colorectal resection for cancer between January 2004 and December 2012 and who showed signs of anastomotic leakage (6%) requiring reoperation were studied using a prospectively maintained database. Patient characteristics, clinical signs, the surgical approach, the role of laparoscopy, operative and postoperative results, and the rate of permanent stoma were analyzed. RESULTS: The median time to diagnosis of an anastomotic leak after surgery was 5.5 days. The median time to reoperation from the diagnosis of leakage was 2 days. Leaks were treated laparoscopically in 21 of 34 (61.8%) patients. Anastomoses were dismantled in 14 patients (41.2%) and the procedure was performed laparoscopically in 28.6% of the cases. The postoperative morbidity was 55.9%, the perioperative mortality 5.7%, and the rate of permanent stoma was 8.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic reoperation can be performed in most cases of anastomotic leaks occurring after minimally invasive colorectal resection for cancer. Anastomosis can be dismantled laparoscopically in 28.6% of the cases. A permanent stoma was necessary only in patients with terminal stomas.

Robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer has a significant risk of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the operative and postoperative results of hybrid right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal robotic-assisted anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon compared with the standard extracorporeal anastomosis in a case control study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight right hemicolectomies for cancer (2009-2012) with laparoscopic medial to lateral dissection, vascular ligation, bowel transection, and robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis with specimen extraction through a Pfannestiel incision (robotic group [RG]) were compared with 48 laparoscopic hemicolectomies (2009-2011) with extracorporeal anastomosis (laparoscopic group [LG]). RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, stage of cancer, and body mass index. Surgery time was significantly longer in RG patients (RG, 266±41 minutes; LG, 223±51 minutes; P<.05). Operative results were similar in the two groups. Recovery of bowel function (day of first bowel movement: RG, 3.0±1.0 days; LG, 4.0±1.2 days; P<.05) and hospital stay (RG, 7.5±2.0 days; LG, 9.0±3.2 days; P<.05) were quicker and shorter, respectively, in RG. There were four anastomotic complications and four incisional hernias in LG and none in RG (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: There are fewer anastomotic and wound complications in RG patients. Intracorporeal robotic-assisted ileocolic anastomosis allows a faster recovery compared with extracorporeal anastomosis.

[Lack of prognostic predictive value of hepatic agobiopsy in a group of patients operated of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma]. / Mancanza di valore prognostico predittivo dell'agobiopsia epatica sull'outcome di una serie consecutiva di pazienti resecati per epatocarcinoma.

AIM: To determine prior to surgery whether a fine needle biopsy is able to define a hepatocellular carcinoma grading, or not. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Thirty patients, who all underwent liver resection for HCC. In every case a fine needle biopsy of the neoplasm was taken prior to surgery, and after the operation a complete microscopic assessment of tumor grade according to Edmondson and Steiner classification was taken. RESULTS: We found no correlation between fine needle biopsy grading and post surgical one. We also found no correlation between fine needle grading and other relevant elements, alpha-fetoprotein levels and number of neoplastic nodules. DISCUSSION: Considering the small number of patients in the study, fine needle biopsy seems to be unfit to determine HCC grading before surgery, this is probably due to the different levels of neoplastic differentiation present into every single nodule and to the characteristics of Edmondson and Steiner classification. In Literature there is at least one study, similar to ours, showing problems in the correct attribution of grading level using this classification. Other authors consider the possibility to modify the scale from a 4-levels one to a 3-levels one. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of these discouraging results, and with a strict follow up monitoring any tumor seeding, we think fine needle biopsy is still fundamental for controversial cases, and for new studies on hepatocellular carcinoma, like those over vascular invasion or the molecular profile of the neoplasm.

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with improved prognosis. The role of clinical, pathological and surgical related factors.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (Hcc) is the third most common cause of cancer death. The aim of this study is to examine the factors associated with improved prognosis in Hcc after liver resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc on cirrhosis at our department. We performed 54 major liver resections and 80 limited resections. All patients enrolled in the study were followed-up three times during the first year after resection and twice the next years. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rate was 7.4%, about 50% of these cases were Child-Pugh B patients. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites, temporary liver impairment function, biliary fistula, hepatic abscess, hemoperitoneum and pleural effusion. Overall survival resulted to be influenced by etiology (P = 0.03), underlying liver disease, in particular Child A vs BC (P = 0.04), Endmondson-Steiner grading (P = 0.01), the absence of a capsule (P = 0.004), the presence of more than one lesion (P = 0.02), lesion's size over 5 cm (P = 0.04), Pringle maneuver length over than 20 minutes (P = 0.03), an amount of resected liver volume lesser than 50% of total liver volume (P = 0.03), and the relapse of Hcc (P= 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma should be both the most radical to obtain the best outcome and to reduce the recurrence's rate, and the most suitable according to the patient's condition, lesion's characteristics and underlying liver disease: because of the large number of factors affecting the outcome of Hcc, unfortunately, we are still far from an agreement upon a group of criteria useful to select the best candidates for liver resection.

Liver resection for HCC: analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatic resection is widely accepted as the best treatment for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in those patients affected by cirrhosis after a sharp selection. Notwithstanding technical advances and high experience of liver resection of specialized centers, the rate of complication after surgical resection could be high. Herein we analyzed causes and foreseeable risk factors on the grounds of data derived from a single center surgical population. METHODOLOGY: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for HCC on cirrhosis at our department. We performed 54 major liver resections and 80 limited resections. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rate was 7.4%, about 50% of these cases were Child-Pugh B patients. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites, hepatic insufficiency, biliary fistula, hepatic abscess, hemoperitoneum and pleural effusion. Intraoperative mortality resulted to be influenced by the amount of resected liver volume (p < 0.05), and the rising of complication (p = 0.006). Some technical aspects of surgical procedure are responsible of the rising of complication as: Pringle maneuver length (p = 0.02), the amount of resected liver volume (p = 0.03) and the request of blood transfusion (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Complications that arise during the postoperative period, although treatable, delay patient's recovery and resumption of liver function; the evaluation of causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity during the planning of surgical treatment should play the same role as other factors weighted in the selection of patients eligible for liver resection.