Development of a Pocket Nomogram to Predict Cancer and Disease Specific Survival After Radical Cystectomy For Bladder Cancer: The CRAB Nomogram.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an easy tool to predict cancer specific (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. METHODS: Data from a consecutive series of 2395 patients with primitive or progression to muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergone to radical cystectomy and lymph nodes dissection in 5 centers were evaluated. Using Cox proportional hazards analyses, the Cancer of the bladder risk assessment (CRAB) nomogram was generated. Accuracy of the nomogram was evaluated by Harrell's C test. Internal validation of the model was performed using 200 bootstraps. RESULTS: Median age was 66 (IQR 58/73) years; 612/2395 (26%) patients presented an advanced pathological stage (≥pT3a); 478/2395 (20%) presented positive lymph nodes. Overall, 729/2395 (30%) presented local or distant recurrence with a median DFS of 42 (IQR 14/89) months. Overall, 642/2395 (27%) died of bladder cancer with a median follow up of 48 (IQR 22/92) months. On univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses, age, stage, and lymph nodes density were a significant predictor of 3 and5 years CSS and DFS. Accuracy of the CRAB nomogram was 0.73 and 0.71 respectively. CONCLUSION: CRAB nomogram can be a practical and easily applicable tool that may help urologists to classify the long-term CSS and DFS of patients treated with radical cystectomy and to predict the oncological outcome.

The active guidewire technique versus standard technique as different way to approach ureteral endoscopic stone treatment.

BACKGROUND: One of the greatest challenges in semi-rigid ureteroscopies, for both stones and tumors, is the control of endoscopic vision and the maintenance of low intracavitary liquid pressure. We present a comparison between two operative techniques: in the first method an ordinary guide wire (diameter 0.032'') is used for the procedure; in the second one a 5 Fr ureteral catheter replaces the guidewire (we called it "Active guidewire") Methods We compared 50 semirigid ureteroscopies (sURS) performed using the active guidewire with another 50 procedures conducted with a classic guidewire. We evaluated the difference in operating times, quality of endoscopic vision, periprocedural infections rate and stone-free rate. RESULTS: The use of active guidewire has considerably reduced the standardized operating times per unit stone-volume by about 39%. Vision quality has improved considerably thanks to the continuous flow in-and-out. Consequently, periprocedural infections decreased (3% vs 30%) and the stone-free rate rose from 86% to 92%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Employing an "active guidewire" instead of the standard guidewire, the risk of complications related to high pressures and operating time is considerably lower, as well as better treatment quality thanks to the cleaner vision. This technique has proven to be safe as well as easy to apply, and in our belief is to be preferred whenever the ureter accepts without forcing, both the presence of the catheter and the semi-rigid 7 F ureteroscope.

Validation of the COBRA nomogram for the prediction of cancer specific survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: An international wide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the Cancer of the Bladder Risk Assessment (COBRA) score has been introduced to estimate cancer specific survival (CSS) after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. OBJECTIVES: Aim of our study was to validate the COBRA score, assessing the effect of age, tumor stage and lymph-nodes status on CSS after cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of 2395 patients with primitive or recurrent bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy in 4 centers were evaluated. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The role of COBRA score as predictor of CSS was assessed using the Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. Accuracy of COBRA score was evaluated by Harrell's C test. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median age was 66 (IQR 58/73) years. Overall, at a median follow-up of 48 (IQR 22/92) months, 642 patients (27%) died of bladder cancer. On Cox proportional hazards analyses, COBRA score was a significant predictor of CSS (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.47-1.61) (Table 1). The predictive accuracy of the COBRA score was 0.71. A sub analysis including pooled COBRA score (0 vs 1-3 vs 4 vs 5-7) improved the clinical applicability with the same accuracy. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the COBRA score is an excellent tool to predict cancer specific survival. The COBRA Score represents a practical and easy tool that may help urologists to classify the CSS of patients treated with radical cystectomy, to predict the oncological outcome and finally to counsel bladder cancer patients.