Cryoablation in 350 Nuss Procedures: Evolution of Hospital Length of Stay and Opioid Use.

INTRODUCTION: Current studies show cryoablation decreases opioid requirements and lengths of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. This study evaluated the relationship between cryoablation and clinical outcomes for the Nuss procedure. METHODS: A retrospective single-center chart review was performed on patients undergoing the Nuss procedure with intercostal cryoablation from December 2017-August 2021. Demographics, hospital course, and postoperative complications were abstracted. To evaluate the evolution of outcomes over time, the earliest quarter (Q1) of cryoablation patients was compared to the last quarter (Q4). RESULTS: Over 45 months, 350 Nuss procedures with cryoablation were performed. The mean age at operation was 15.7 ± 2.3 years with an average Haller Index of 5.4 ± 4.2. The mean operative time was 136 ± 40.5 minutes. On average, patients used 2.8 ± 2.5 OME/kg of opioid in hospital with a LOS of 2.7 ± 1.1 days. The Q4 patients were discharged 1.3 days earlier (p<0.05) than Q1 patients, with 80% of Q4 discharged by postoperative day #2 vs. 23% in Q1 (p<0.05). Q4 patients received 74% (p<0.05) less opioid in hospital and 21% (p<0.05) less on discharge. Within 90 days postoperatively, complication rates (chest tube placement, wound infection, readmission, neuropathic pain) were similar. Only two patients (0.6%) required reoperation for bar migration/slippage. CONCLUSION: With increased experience, cryoablation for the Nuss procedure decreased opioid use by 74% and was associated with 80% of patients achieving early discharge. Major complication rates were not increased. Cryoablation can be successfully implemented as an effective method of postoperative analgesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation in Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: Effect on Pulmonary Function.

Introduction: Cryoablation of intercostal nerves is performed for pain control after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Cryoablation affects both sensory and motor neurons, resulting in temporary anesthesia to the chest wall and loss of intercostal motor function. The study objective is to determine the effect of cryoablation on incentive spirometry (IS) volumes, as a measure of pulmonary function, after MIRPE. Materials and Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE was performed. All patients received a multimodal regimen (MMR) of analgesics postoperatively. Three groups were compared-cryoablation (CRYO), elastomeric pain pump (EPP), and MMR alone. The primary outcomes were postoperative IS volumes and IS volumes as a ratio of preoperative forced vital capacity (FVC). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid use, length of stay (LOS), and infectious complications. Results: MIRPE was performed in 115 patients: 50 CRYO, 50 EPP, and 15 MMR alone. Groups were similar for demographics and pectus excavatum severity. Postoperative spirometry measurements were similar across groups: IS (CRYO 750 mL [500,961] versus EPP 750 mL [590,1019] versus MMR 696 mL [500,1037], P = .77); IS/FVC (CRYO 0.19 [0.14,0.26] versus EPP 0.20 [0.16,0.26] versus MMR 0.16 [0.15,0.24], P = .69). Although pain scores were also similar across groups, CRYO patients used less opioid (P < .05) and had shorter LOS (P < .05). Postoperative pneumonia was rare and similar across groups (P = 1.00). Conclusion: Intercostal nerve cryoablation during MIRPE does not adversely affect postoperative IS volumes or increase pneumonia rate, despite the temporary loss of motor innervation to intercostal muscles. Cryoablation provides effective pain control with less opioid use.

Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident.

BACKGROUND: Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency and activities interrupted during night calls have not been fully described. METHODS: For a period of 44 days (August through September), all calls and pages received during the 12-hour night call session were documented. Calls were analyzed by caller, urgency, need for intervention, and resident interrupted by the communication. RESULTS: A total of 494 communications were identified with a mean of 10 calls per shift (IQR 7-14). Communications lasted a mean of 2.7 +/- 2.9 minutes. Direct calls occurred in 78% and pages in 22% of the cases. From the non-ED calls (n = 335), most of them came from nursing staff (85%), followed by other specialties (12%). Five percent of the calls were directed to the wrong service. Communications occurred during charting (41%), patient assessment (33%), interrupted resident's sleep (12%), or during a surgical procedure (6%). Communication required no action in 47% of the cases. A physician order was needed in 41%, while bedside clinical assessment was required in 12% of the calls. CONCLUSIONS: Communications are common at night, but most did not require clinical assessment. A large portion of communications interrupted direct patient care. An opportunity exists to eliminate nonproductive communications and improve the quality of medical education.

Charge Awareness Affects Treatment Choice: Prospective Randomized Trial in Pediatric Appendectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether charge awareness affects patient decisions. BACKGROUND: Pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis can be treated with open or laparoscopic techniques. These 2 operations are considered to have clinical equipoise. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, nonobese children admitted to a children's hospital with uncomplicated appendicitis were randomized to view 1 of 2 videos discussing open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Videos were identical except that only one presented the difference in surgical materials charges. Patients and parents then choose which operation they desired. Videos were available in English and Spanish. A postoperative survey was conducted to examine factors that influenced choice. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 01738750). RESULTS: Of 275 consecutive cases, 100 met enrollment criteria. In the group exposed to charge data (n = 49), 63% chose open technique versus 35% not presented charge data (P = 0.005). Patients were 1.8 times more likely to choose the less expensive option when charge estimate was given (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.75). The median total hospital charges were $1554 less for those who had open technique (P < 0.001) and $528 less for the group exposed to charge information (P = 0.033). Survey found that 90% of families valued having input in this decision and 31% of patients exposed to charge listed it as their primary reason for their choice in technique. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and parents tended to choose the less expensive but equally effective technique when given the opportunity. A discussion of treatment options, which includes charge information, may represent an unrealized opportunity to affect change in health care spending.