Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 136(3): 230-8, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15713985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Basophil activation is associated with the expression of CD63. In birch-pollen-associated food allergy to celery, carrot and apple, Bet v 1, Api g 1, Dau c 1 and Mal d 1 are major allergens. Recombinant allergens have not yet been used in the CD63-based basophil activation test (BAT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of using recombinant allergens in the BAT in the diagnosis of allergy to apple, carrot and celery and to compare results with routine tests, i.e. skin prick tests (SPTs) and specific IgE. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with an oral allergy syndrome induced by apple, carrot or celery and 22 controls were studied. SPTs were performed with native foods. Specific IgE was determined by the CAP method and basophil activation by flowcytometry upon double staining with anti-IgE/anti-CD63 monoclonal antibodies after incubating with purified recombinant Bet v 1, Bet v 2, Api g 1, Dau c 1 and Mal d 1. RESULTS: By the combined use of the BAT and the CAP method, sensitization to Bet v 1 and Bet v 2 was detected in 100 and 25% of all subjects, respectively. Sensitivity of specific IgE for apple, carrot and celery was 60, 70 and 75% with corresponding specificities of 64, 86 and 82%. Sensitivity of the BAT for Mal d 1, Dau c 1 and Api g 1 was 75, 65 and 75% with corresponding specificities of 68, 100 and 77%. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT using recombinant allergens provides a valuable new in vitro method for the detection of sensitization to foods. Although double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges remain the gold standard to confirm food allergy, the CD63-based BAT with recombinant allergens may supplement routine tests for allergy diagnosis.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Basófilos/imunologia , Betula/imunologia , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Pólen/imunologia , Alérgenos/análise , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Antígenos CD/análise , Antígenos CD/biossíntese , Antígenos de Plantas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/sangue , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/análise , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Técnicas In Vitro , Proteínas de Plantas/imunologia , Glicoproteínas da Membrana de Plaquetas/análise , Glicoproteínas da Membrana de Plaquetas/biossíntese , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Cutâneos , Tetraspanina 30
2.
Hautarzt ; 56(1): 38-43, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15625602

RESUMO

Over the past 10 years a number of studies on basophil activation tests (BAT) have been published which focus on their use as diagnostic methods in clarifying IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to various allergens including drugs. These BAT are based on flow cytometric quantification of allergen- induced CD63 or CD203 expression or measurement of sulfo leukotriene release by ELISA. In the diagnosis of penicillin allergy, the combined use of the CD63-BAT and specific IgE increases sensitivity. The role of BAT in the diagnosis of non-IgE-mediated reactions to non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs remains to be clarified. This article focuses on (1) the principles of BAT, (2) technical aspects, (3) clinical applications and (4) recommendations for further development.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Teste de Degranulação de Basófilos/métodos , Toxidermias/diagnóstico , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
Allergy ; 59(10): 1102-9, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15355470

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As in vitro diagnosis of wasp venom sensitization by specific serum IgE has a sensitivity of only 60-80%, additional in vitro tests are desirable. Basophil activation is associated with the expression of CD63 and its measurement has been proposed as a novel in vitro test for immediate-type allergy. Furthermore, to date, no in vitro test exists to monitor successful specific immunotherapy (SIT) with wasp venom. Therefore, the potentially harmful sting challenge is still recommended. OBJECTIVE: We compared the CD63-based basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of wasp venom allergy with skin tests and measurement of specific IgE. Furthermore, we investigated whether BAT can predict the outcome of the sting challenge in patients on SIT. METHODS: Fifty patients with a systemic reaction caused by a wasp sting and 20 controls were studied. Intracutaneous tests were performed with wasp and bee venom in the suspected allergics. Specific IgE was determined by the CAP-FEIA method and basophil activation by flow cytometry upon double staining with anti-IgE/anti-CD63 mAb. Twenty-five patients were sting challenged 6 months after starting SIT and the BAT was repeated before challenge. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the intracutaneous tests, specific IgE and BAT was 100, 76, and 92%, respectively. Specificity of specific IgE and the BAT was 85 and 80%, respectively. The cut-off for a positive BAT was 15% CD63+ basophils. There was a positive correlation between IgE reactivity to wasp venom and the number of CD63+ basophils (r = 0.65). Although no patient had a systemic reaction upon sting challenge, in most subjects basophil activation did not decrease when compared with the BAT before SIT. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitation of basophil activation by CD63 expression is a valuable new in vitro method for diagnosis of allergy to hymenopteran venoms. The CD63-based BAT is a helpful tool for the complementation of routine diagnostic tests such as specific IgE as it increases sensitivity of in vitro detection of sensitization. However, this in vitro method does not offer an alternative to the sting challenge in monitoring successful SIT.


Assuntos
Basófilos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Venenos de Vespas/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antígenos CD/imunologia , Venenos de Abelha/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Glicoproteínas da Membrana de Plaquetas/imunologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Cutâneos , Tetraspanina 30
4.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 33(5): 607-14, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12752589

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Basophil activation is associated with the expression of CD63. Because allergens can induce basophil activation by cross-linking specific IgE, increased CD63 expression has been proposed as a novel in vitro test for immediate type allergy. OBJECTIVE: We compared the CD63-based basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of allergy to carrot, celery and hazelnut with skin prick tests (SPT) and measurement of allergen-specific IgE. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with a history of an oral allergy syndrome induced by carrot, celery or hazelnut (n = 20 for each allergen) and 20 controls were studied. SPT were performed with standardized and native carrot, celery and hazelnut extracts. Allergen-specific IgE was determined by the CAP FEIA method and basophil activation was determined by flow cytometry upon double staining with anti-IgE/anti-CD63 mAb. RESULTS: SPT with native carrot, celery and hazelnut showed sensitivities of 100%, 100% and 90%, and specificities of 80%, 80% and 90%. SPT with commercial extracts of the same allergens gave sensitivities of 85%, 80% and 85%, and specificities of 80%, 80% and 90%. Sensitivity of allergen-specific IgE and the BAT for carrot, celery and hazelnut was 80% vs. 85%, 70% vs. 85%, and 80% vs. 90%, with corresponding specificities of 80% vs. 85%, 80% vs. 80%, and 95% vs. 90%. The cut-off for a positive BAT was 10% CD63+ basophils. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between IgE reactivity and the number of CD63+ basophils for all food allergens (carrot: r = 0.69, celery: r = 0.67, hazelnut: r = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of basophil activation by CD63 expression is a valuable new in vitro method for diagnosis of immediate type food sensitization. Although double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges remain the gold standard, the CD63-based BAT may supplement routine diagnostic tests such as SPT or allergen-specific IgE in the future.


Assuntos
Antígenos CD/sangue , Basófilos/metabolismo , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Teste de Degranulação de Basófilos/métodos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Moléculas de Adesão Celular/metabolismo , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Hipersensibilidade a Noz/diagnóstico , Glicoproteínas da Membrana de Plaquetas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Tetraspanina 30 , Verduras/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...