Variation in General Dentists' Patterns of Sealant Use in Children with Elevated Caries Risk.

INTRODUCTION: Strong evidence supports use of dental sealants to prevent tooth decay, and professional guidelines recommend use in children with elevated caries risk. However, not all children indicated for sealants receive this preventive intervention, even when they use routine dental care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the extent to which dentists' use of sealants varied in pediatric patients with elevated caries risk. METHODS: Claims and enrollment data from a private dental program were used to identify a cohort of 6- to 17-y-olds with elevated caries risk (N = 27,677) and general dentists (N = 818) who provided services to the children. Children were identified as having elevated caries risk based on history of restorative treatment over a 5-y period (2010-2014). The 2 outcomes of interest were whether a dentist provided any sealants to children with elevated risk and, if so, the extent to which these were used during a 2-y observation period (2013-2014). A 2-stage hurdle model was used for multivariable analysis to identify dentist characteristics associated with sealant use. RESULTS: Over the observation period, 13.3% (n = 109) of dentists did not provide any sealants to their elevated risk patients from the study cohort. Logistic regression found that female dentists were significantly more likely to have used sealants (odds ratio = 2.27); dentist age and practice in an isolated small rural town were negatively associated with any sealant use. However, among dentists who did place sealants (n = 709), female dentists, older dentists, dentists in solo practice, and those working full-time were significantly more likely to provide sealants to a child. Overall, substantial variation in practitioners' use of sealants was observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to explore provider-level variation in sealant use, representing a critical step in future efforts to increase routine use of sealants by dentists and eliminate oral health disparities. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Findings from this study can be used to design targeted policy and behavioral interventions to increase sealant use by general dentists. This study provides foundational evidence for future research that explores motivation and barriers to routine use of preventive dental interventions by clinicians.

The Effects of Medical Well Baby Visits in Promoting Earlier First Dental Visits for Children.

The objective of the study was to assess the effects of medical well baby visits in promoting earlier first dental visits. We analyzed Iowa Medicaid claims data (2000-2013). The sample included 4 cohorts of children born in 2000, 2003, 2007, or 2010 and enrolled in Medicaid from birth (N = 38,211). Children were followed for 3 y. The independent variables were cohort year and medical well baby visit frequency during 3 time periods (birth to age 10 mo, ages 11-19 mo, ages 20-36 mo). We used survival analyses to estimate first dental visit rates. First dental visit rates improved significantly from 2000 to 2013, with children in latter cohorts having significantly earlier first dental visits. Children with more medical well baby visits before age 11 mo had significantly delayed first dental visit rates than children with fewer medical well baby visits. The opposite was observed for children with more medical well baby visits between ages 11 to 19 mo and ages 20 to 36 mo. First dental visit rates for Medicaid-enrolled children have improved, but there continues to be a need for early interventions to improve age 1 dental visits and other preventive oral health behaviors. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study can be used by policy makers when developing strategies to improve access to dental care for young children in Medicaid. With consideration to promoting earlier preventive dental visits for publicly insured children, this study could lead to early interventions and improved health outcomes.

Understanding Pediatric Dentists' Dental Caries Management Treatment Decisions: A Conjoint Experiment.

When traditional ranking and rating surveys are used to assess dentists' treatment decisions, the patient's source of payment appears to be of little importance. Therefore, this study used the marketing research tool conjoint analysis to investigate the relative impact of source of payment along with the child's age and cooperativeness on pediatric dentists' willingness to use Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) to restore posterior primary teeth. A conjoint survey was completed by 707 pediatric dentists. Three factors (age of the child, cooperativeness, type of insurance) were varied across 3 levels to create 9 patient scenarios. The relative weights that dentists placed on these factors in the restorative treatment decision process were determined by conjoint analysis. "Cooperativeness" (52%) was the most important factor, "age of the child" (26%) the second-most important factor, followed by "insurance status of the child" (22%). For the third factor, insurance, pediatric dentists were least willing to use ART with publicly insured children (-0.082), and this was significantly different from their willingness to use ART with uninsured children (0.010) but not significantly different than their willingness to use ART for children with private insurance (0.073). Unlike traditional ranking and rating tools, conjoint analysis found that the insurance status of the patient appeared to be an important factor in dentists' decisions about different restorative treatment options. When pediatric dentists were forced to make tradeoffs among different patients' factors, they were most willing to use ART technique with young, uncooperative patients when they had no insurance. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The present study suggests the feasibility of using techniques borrowed from marketing research, such as conjoint analysis, to understand dentists' restorative treatment decisions. Results of this study demonstrate pediatric dentists' willingness to use a particular restorative treatment option (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in this application) when forced to make tradeoffs in a "conjoined," or holistic, context among different factors presented in real-life patient scenarios. A deeper understanding of dentists' treatment decisions is vital to develop valid practice guidelines and interventions that encourage the use of appropriate restorative treatment modalities.

Unexplained symptoms in primary care: perspectives of doctors and patients.

This study evaluated unexplained symptoms in primary care from the perspective of both patients and physicians. The data were obtained from two 1998 statewide surveys, one targeting Medicaid patients and the other all primary care physicians in the state. There were 439 patients who responded (45% response rate) and 280 primary care physicians who responded (33% response rate). Half of the patients and half of the physicians were in non-metropolitan counties. Half of the patients reported unexplained symptom usually or always, and 75% of whom sought help for these symptoms. Fifty-two percent of these patients believed their physician was very concerned about their unexplained symptoms. Eighty percent of them rated their physician as providing the best possible care compared to only 49% of patients whose physician did not care about their unexplained symptoms (P=.001). Among the physicians, only 14% reported very good or excellent satisfaction with managing unexplained symptoms as compared to 44% who claimed similar satisfaction in managing psychological problems. Physicians who saw themselves as more effective in dealing with somatoform symptoms were more likely to be in solo practice (P<.005), or in the same location for at least five years (P=.04). Residence in a nonmetropolitan county did not affect patient reporting of symptoms, patient perception of physician concern about symptoms, or physician satisfaction in managing these symptoms. These results indicate the prevalence and importance of unexplained symptoms in the Medicaid population and the comfort of physicians in managing these symptoms. There is an unmet need among primary care physicians to learn how to manage patients with unexplained symptoms.

Medicaid costs associated with the hospitalization of young children for restorative dental treatment under general anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: This paper examines the cost to the Iowa Medicaid program of hospitalizing young children for restorative dental care under general anesthesia, and describes the dental services received in this setting. METHODS: Medicaid dental claims for young children receiving restorative dental care under general anesthesia during fiscal year 1994 were matched with corresponding hospital and anesthesia claims. RESULTS: The total cost to the Medicaid program of treating a child in the hospital under general anesthesia was $2,009 per case. Less than 2 percent of Medicaid-enrolled children under 6 years of age who received any dental service accounted for 25 percent of all dollars spent on dental services for this age group, including hospital and anesthesia care. The most frequent type of procedure was stainless steel crowns (SSCs), with an average of almost six per case. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification, prevention, and intervention are critically important to prevent the costly treatment of children with ECC in hospital operating rooms.

Primary care physician perceptions of the nurse practitioner in the 1990s.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with primary care physician attitudes toward nurse practitioners (NPs) providing primary care. DESIGN: A mailed survey of primary care physicians in Iowa. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Half (N = 616) of the non-institutional-based, full-time, primary care physicians in Iowa in spring 1994. Although 360 (58.4%) responded, only physicians with complete data on all items in the model were used in these analyses (n = 259 [42.0%]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: There were 2 principal dependent measures: physician attitudes toward NPs providing primary care (an 11-item instrument) and physician experience with NPs in this role. Bivariate relationships between physician demographic and practice characteristics were evaluated by chi 2 tests, as were both dependent variables. Ordinary least-squares regression was used to determine factors related to physician attitudes toward NPs. RESULTS: In bivariate analyses, physicians were significantly more likely to have had experience with an NP providing primary care if they were in pediatrics or obstetrics-gynecology (78.3% and 70.0%, respectively; P < .001), had been in practice for fewer than 20 years (P = .045), or were in practices with 5 or more physicians. The ordinary least-squares regression indicated that physicians with previous experience working with NPs providing primary care (P = .01), physicians practicing in urban areas with populations greater than 20,000 but far from a metropolitan area (P = .03), and general practice physicians (P = .04) had significantly more favorable attitudes toward NPs than did other primary care physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The association between previous experience with a primary care NP and a more positive attitude toward NPs has important implications for the training of primary care physicians, particularly in community-based, multidisciplinary settings.

Factors affecting primary care physician participation in Medicare.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the levels of participation and the relative association of economic and noneconomic factors on primary care physician participation in the Medicare program. METHODS: Demographic information, participation in Medicare, and attitudes toward both the Medicare program and Medicare patients were collected in a written survey mailed to half the primary care physicians in Iowa. Ordinary least squares and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with the percentage of Medicare patients in a practice and the acceptance of all new Medicare patients, respectively. RESULTS: Two thirds of physicians were accepting all new Medicare patients, whereas 16% were accepting no new Medicare patients. Factors associated with having a higher percentage of Medicare patients in a practice were as follows: (1) a larger proportion of Medicare recipients in the county, (2) practice as a general internal medicine physician, (3) more years in practice at the current location, (4) greater enjoyment treating elderly patients, (5) less concern about having too many Medicare patients, and (6) a stronger belief that the Medicare program respects their professional judgment. Physicians less concerned about having too many Medicare patients in their practice and physicians in counties with a higher percentage of Medicare patients were significantly more likely to accept all new Medicare patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that as Medicare reforms are discussed, careful consideration of the impact of these reforms on noneconomic issues is important to ensure adequate physician participation and access for elderly patients through the Medicare program.

Utilization of dental services by Iowa Medicaid-enrolled children younger than 6 years old.

All Medicaid-enrolled children are eligible to receive dental care through the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment Program (EPSDT). As part of an evaluation of the effectiveness of the EPSDT program in Iowa, Medicaid enrollment and claims files from fiscal year (FY) 1994 were used to evaluate the utilization of dental services by Medicaid-enrolled children younger than age 6 during FY 1994. During FY 1994, 23% of Medicaid-enrolled children younger than age 6 received at least one dental service while enrolled in the Medicaid program. The total Medicaid-allowed charges for all dental services provided to this population while enrolled in Medicaid during FY 1994 was $1.53 million (the amount Medicaid would pay for the service, prior to calculating any copayments or other insurance charges). Although the EPSDT program in Iowa requires a referral of all Medicaid-enrolled children to a dentist at 1 year of age, fewer than 4% of enrolled children in this age group received any dental services. The percent of enrolled children receiving a dental exam during FY 1994, by age, was as follows: younger than 1 year, 0.2%; age 1, 3%; age 2, 10%; age 3, 27%; age 4, 46%; age 5, 54%. Utilization rates of dental services by Medicaid-enrolled children in Iowa fall far short of federal regulations, which currently require that 80% of enrollees receive EPSDT screenings, referrals, and treatment by age 3.

Primary care case management and birth outcomes in the Iowa Medicaid program.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares prenatal care utilization and birth outcomes between Iowa Medicaid recipients receiving care in a primary care case management (PCCM) system and those receiving care in a fee-for-service (FFS) system. METHODS: Birth certificates linked with Medicaid hospitalization claims were analyzed for seven PCCM and seven FFS counties. RESULTS: From 1989 through 1992, there was (1) a 20% increase in the number of women who received adequate prenatal care in the FFS counties, vs a 5% increase in the PCCM counties; (2) a 17% increase in the number of women who initiated care within the first trimester in the FFS counties, vs a 6% increase in the PCCM counties; and (3) a 442% increase in the number of women who received enhanced prenatal services in the FFS counties, vs a 278% increase in the PCCM counties. There were no significant differences between groups in mean gestational age or birthweight; however, there was an increase of very-low-birthweight babies in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCCM, as implemented by the Iowa Medicaid program, has not appreciably improved prenatal care utilization or birth outcomes.

Organizational predictors of outcomes of long-stay nursing home residents.

Analysis of physical function as a measure of nursing home resident outcomes in 10 nursing homes revealed that organizational design variables were important. Results were consistent with contingency theory, which posits that to maximize performance organizational structure should be adjusted to variations in task difficulty and variability. This study revealed that better resident outcomes sometimes are achieved in faster-paced nursing homes when employees are less closely supervised and when the basis for job assignment is clear and consistent. A more hierarchical structure may be effective when workload is heavy. However, when workload and pace are held constant, better outcomes are associated with smaller hierarchies and non-specific job assignment. Implications for management and future research are discussed.