RESUMO
Parental involvement is an essential component of obesity prevention interventions for children. The present study provides a process and impact evaluation of the family component of SuperFIT. SuperFIT is a comprehensive, integrated intervention approach aiming to improve energy balance-related behaviors (EBRBs) of young children (2-4 years). A mixed methods design combined in-depth interviews with parents (n = 15) and implementers (n = 3) with questionnaire data on nutritional and physical activity-related parenting practices (CFPQ and PPAPP), the physical home environment (EPAO_SR) (n = 41), and intervention appreciation (n = 19). Results were structured using the concepts of reach, adoption, implementation, and perceived impact. Findings indicated that the families reached were mostly those that were already interested in the topic. Participants of the intervention appreciated the information received and the on-the-spot guidance on their child's behavior. Having fun was considered a success factor within the intervention. Parents expressed the additional need for peer-to-peer discussion. SuperFIT increased awareness and understanding of parents' own behavior. Parents made no changes in daily life routines or the physical home environment. Translating knowledge and learned strategies into behavior at home has yet to be achieved. To optimize impact, intervention developers should find the right balance between accessibility, content, and intensity of interventions for parents.
Assuntos
Metabolismo Energético , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Comportamento Infantil , Educação Infantil , Pré-Escolar , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Relações Pais-Filho , Pais , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Data on physical, psychological, and social functioning of patients with psoriasis have been presented in many studies. The introduction of quality-of-life questionnaires has made it possible to systematically compare these data across studies. The aim of this study was to present an overview of quality-of-life data and to describe the relationship between demographic and clinical variables and quality of life in patients with psoriasis. Computerized bibliographic databases were screened for publications from January 1966 to April 2000. Predefined selection criteria were used to identify quality-of-life studies in psoriasis. Two investigators independently assessed and, subsequently, agreed on inclusion. Data were extracted on the objectives, methods, sample characteristics, and results of the studies. A total of 118 publications were found. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Patients with psoriasis reported physical discomfort, impaired emotional functioning, a negative body and self-image, and limitations in daily activities, social contacts and (skin-exposing) activities, and work. More severe psoriasis was associated with lower levels of quality of life. There was a tendency that higher age was associated with slightly lower levels of physical functioning and slightly higher levels of psychological functioning and overall quality of life. Sex and quality of life were found to be unrelated.
Assuntos
Psoríase/fisiopatologia , Psoríase/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Atividades Cotidianas , Envelhecimento , Emoções , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Caracteres SexuaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the suitability of current quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires for psoriasis research. DATA SOURCES: Computerized searches of 5 bibliographic databases. QUESTIONNAIRE SELECTION: Predefined criteria were used to identify QOL questionnaires in dermatologic studies. Two investigators independently assessed and agreed on multidimensional generic, dermatology-specific, and psoriasis-specific QOL questionnaires for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on the internal structure, reliability, and validity of the included questionnaires. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three generic, 3 dermatology-specific, and none of the psoriasis-specific questionnaires met the inclusion criteria: the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), the Dermatology Quality of Life Scales (DQOLS), the Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life Instrument (DSQL), and the Skindex-29. The generic NHP, SF-36 and SIP are well established, reliable, and valid. Although the data are not conclusive, the SF-36 was useful to assess effects of psoriasis on its component scales. The dermatology-specific DQOLS, DSQL, and Skindex-29 are relatively new and, therefore, less widely tested. Available psychometric data demonstrated the reliability and validity of all 3 dermatology-specific questionnaires. The Skindex-29 was also useful to assess change. CONCLUSIONS: None of the identified psoriasis-specific questionnaires met the inclusion criteria. Data on the suitability of the included questionnaires for psoriasis research were relatively sparse. The included generic questionnaires allow comparisons with nondermatologic diseases but do not allow assessment of relevant dermatology-specific aspects and are not sensitive to subtle effects of psoriasis on QOL. On the basis of the psychometric data of the present review, we find the Skindex-29 to be the most valuable dermatology-specific questionnaire for psoriasis research. Combination of the Skindex-29 with the generic SF-36 combines the merits of both types of questionnaires and we therefore recommend this combination.