Primary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Above-Knee Amputations in Patients with Unsalvageable Limbs from Limb-Threatening Ischemia or Infection.

BACKGROUND: Amputees frequently suffer from chronic pain in both their residual limbs (RLP) and phantom limbs (PLP) following their amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a nerve transfer technique that has been demonstrated to improve pain secondarily and at time of amputation. The goal of this study is to report on the efficacy of primary TMR at time of above-knee level amputations in the setting of limb-threatening ischemia or infection. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a single-surgeon experience with TMR in patients undergoing through- or above-knee level amputations from January 2018 to June 2021. Patient charts were reviewed for the comorbidities in the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Postoperative notes were assayed for presence and absence of RLP and PLP, overall pain severity, chronic narcotic use, ambulatory status, and complications. A control group of patients undergoing lower limb amputation who did not receive TMR from January 2014 to December 2017 was used for comparison. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with through- or above-knee level amputations and primary TMR were included in this study. The tibial and common peroneal nerves were transferred in all cases to motor branches to the gastrocnemius, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris. Fifty-eight patients with through- or above-knee level amputations without TMR were included for comparison. The TMR group had significantly less overall pain (41.5 vs. 67.2%, p = 0.01), RLP (26.8 vs. 44.8%, p = 0.04), and PLP (19.5 vs. 43.1%, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in complication rates. CONCLUSION: TMR can safely and effectively be performed at time of a through- and above-knee level amputation and improves pain outcomes.

Perioperative misgendering experiences in patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery: a call for a gender-inclusive healthcare environment.

Background: Transgender individuals have long experienced discrimination and exclusion from medicine. Misgendering occurs when an individual is referred to using a gender or address incongruent with their identity. We evaluated the incidence of misgendering throughout the perioperative experience for patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery (GAS). Methods: Patients diagnosed with gender dysphoria who previously received GAS by the senior author were contacted to complete an IRB-approved survey to evaluate instances of misgendering while in the hospital for GAS. Study results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Of 471 patients contacted, 182 completed the survey (38.6%). The most cited gender identity was transfemale (28.0%). Most patients reported respect for their gender identity (60.4%) and name (76.8%) during their perioperative experience. Twenty-two percent cited triggering experiences, and 15.4% reported interactions with healthcare employees causing them to reach out to a support system. Misgendering most commonly included incorrect use of patients' preferred names and/or pronouns (n = 50, 86.2%), most commonly at surgical check-in (n = 10, 45.5%). Recommendations to improve feelings of gender congruence during patients' stay included updated names and gender identities in electronic medical records (80.8%), and names and pronouns listed on curtains and doors (52.3%) and name tags (51.5%). Conclusions: Until now, the exact incidence of misgendering among patients seeking GAS have not been well established. Despite high levels of satisfaction, a large proportion still reported serious instances of misgendering. Improvements must be made to the perioperative experience to reduce misgendering and provide support and comfort during the sensitive period surrounding patients' gender transition.Level of evidence: Not gradable. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00238-022-02040-2.