Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 40(5): 562-569, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394664

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The impact of mental health comorbidities on outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in workers' compensation (WC) patients has not been robustly explored. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of mental health comorbidities on pain, disability, quality of life, and return to work after lumbar spine surgery in WC patients. METHODS: A nationwide, prospective surgical outcomes registry (National Neurosurgery Quality Outcomes Database [N2QOD]) was queried for all patients who underwent 1- to 4-level lumbar decompression and/or fusion from 2012 to 2021. Patients were stratified on the basis of compensation status into non-WC (25,507) and WC (1018) cohorts. Baseline demographic data, perioperative safety data, and patient-reported outcome measures were compared between groups. The WC cohort was further subdivided on the basis of mental health status into patients with anxiety and depression (n = 107) and those without anxiety and depression (n = 911). Propensity matching was used to generate parity between these subgroups, generating 214 patients (107 pairs) for analysis. Perioperative safety, facility utilization, 1-year patient-reported outcomes (back and leg pain, disability, and quality of life), and return to work were measured as a function of WC and mental health comorbidity status. RESULTS: A total of 26,525 patients (25,507 non-WC and 1018 WC) who underwent 1- to 4-level lumbar spine surgery were reviewed. WC patients were younger, healthier (lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class), more likely to be minorities, less educated, and more likely to smoke and had greater baseline back pain, disability, and quality of life compared to non-WC patients. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was similar between groups (11%). WC patients had worse outcomes for all measures and lower rates of return to work compared to non-WC patients. WC patients with anxiety and depression demonstrated even greater disparities in all outcomes. After propensity matching, WC patients with anxiety and depression continued to demonstrate significantly worse outcomes in comparison to WC patients without anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in WC patients are exacerbated in patients with anxiety and depression. WC patients with mental health comorbidities receive the least benefit from lumbar spine surgery and may represent the most vulnerable subset of patients with spine pathology. Addressing mental health comorbidities preoperatively may represent an opportunity for valuable resource allocation and surgical optimization in the WC population.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Vértebras Lombares , Qualidade de Vida , Retorno ao Trabalho , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Humanos , Masculino , Retorno ao Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Fusão Vertebral , Estudos Prospectivos , Saúde Mental , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Pessoas com Deficiência/psicologia , Sistema de Registros
2.
World Neurosurg ; 180: e729-e732, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37806518

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cervical microendoscopic laminoforaminotomy (MELF) has been proven to be an effective, motion preserving procedure for the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Cervical 4 (C4) radiculopathies are often unrecognized by the initial evaluating physician and may be misdiagnosed as axial neck pain. In this study, we compare MELF to anterior cervical disk fusion (ACDF) for C4 radiculopathy in the largest series of minimally invasive foraminotomy for C4 radiculopathy to date. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective chart review of 42 cases for C4 radiculopathy, 21 MELF and 21 ACDF. Primary outcome measures were length of surgery, length of hospital stay, and time to return to work. Secondary outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain and reoperation rate. RESULTS: All patients were diagnosed with a unilateral C4 radiculopathy using magnetic resonance imaging or steroid injections. The length of surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly decreased in the MELF group compared with ACDF. VAS neck pain significantly decreased for patients in both groups, but the difference between MELF and ACDF was not statistically significant. There were no major complications. No patient underwent revision at the index level or adjacent levels in the MELF group. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that C4 radiculopathy can be identified with appropriate history, physical examination, and targeted nerve root injections. When identified, these radiculopathies that fail conservative therapy can be effectively treated with cervical microendoscopic laminoforaminotomy, with comparable outcomes to ACDF. The length of surgery and length of stay are reduced when compared with ACDF.


Assuntos
Foraminotomia , Radiculopatia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Radiculopatia/etiologia , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Cervicalgia/etiologia , Cervicalgia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Discotomia/métodos , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Foraminotomia/métodos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia
3.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 39(6): 822-830, 2023 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37503915

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients with workers' compensation (WC) claims are reported to demonstrate poorer surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. However, outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in WC patients remain debatable. The authors aimed to compare outcomes between a propensity score-matched population of WC and non-WC patients who underwent ACDF. METHODS: Patients who underwent 1- to 4-level ACDF were retrospectively reviewed from the prospectively maintained Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). After propensity score matching, 1-year patient satisfaction, physical disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI]), pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), EQ-5D, and return to work were compared between WC and non-WC cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 9957 patients were included (9610 non-WC and 347 WC patients). Patients in the WC cohort were significantly younger (50 ± 9.1 vs 56 ± 11.4 years, p < 0.001), less educated, and were more frequently male, non-Caucasian, and active smokers (29.1% vs 18.1%, p < 0.001), with greater baseline VAS and NDI scores and poorer quality of life (p < 0.001). One-year postoperative improvements in VAS, NDI, EQ-5D, and return-to-work rates and satisfaction were all significantly worse for WC compared with non-WC patients. After adjusting for baseline differences via propensity score matching, WC versus non-WC patients continued to demonstrate worse 3- and 12-month VAS neck pain and NDI (p = 0.010), satisfaction (χ2 = 4.03, p = 0.045), and delayed return to work (9.3 vs 5.7 weeks, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: WC status was associated with greater 1-year residual disability and axial pain along with delayed return to work, without any difference in quality of life despite having fewer comorbidities and being a younger population. Further studies are needed to determine the societal impact that WC claims have on healthcare delivery in the setting of ACDF.


Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Humanos , Masculino , Retorno ao Trabalho , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Discotomia , Cervicalgia/cirurgia , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia
4.
Neurosurgery ; 93(4): 867-874, 2023 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37067954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) have emerged as an alternative setting for surgical care as part of the national effort to lower health care costs. The literature regarding the safety of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) in the ASC setting is limited to few small case series. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of MIS TLIF performed in the ASC vs inpatient hospital setting. METHODS: A total of 775 patients prospectively enrolled in the Quality Outcomes Database undergoing single-level MIS TLIF at a single ASC (100) or the inpatient hospital setting (675) were compared. Propensity matching generated 200 patients for analysis (100 per cohort). Demographic data, resource utilization, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and patient satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences regarding baseline demographic data, clinical history, or comorbidities after propensity matching. Only 1 patient required inpatient transfer from the ASC because of intractable pain. All other patients were discharged home within 23 hours of surgery. The rates of 90-day readmission (2.0%) and reoperation (0%) were equivalent between groups. Both groups experienced significant improvements in all PROMs (Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol-5D, back pain, and leg pain) at 3 months that were maintained at 1 year. PROMs did not differ between groups at any time point. Patient satisfaction was similar between groups at 3 and 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients, MIS TLIF may be performed safely in the ASC setting with no statistically significant difference in safety or efficacy in comparison with the inpatient setting.


Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Espondilolistese , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Pacientes Internados , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Neurosurgery ; 93(3): 628-635, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36995083

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are the most common surgical approaches for medically refractory cervical radiculopathy. Rigorous cost-effectiveness studies comparing ACDF and PCF are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-utility of ACDF vs PCF performed in the ambulatory surgery center setting for Medicare and privately insured patients at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 323 patients who underwent 1-level ACDF (201) or PCF (122) at a single ambulatory surgery center were compared. Propensity matching generated 110 pairs (220 patients) for analysis. Demographic data, resource utilization, patient-reported outcome measures, and quality-adjusted life-years were assessed. Direct costs (1-year resource use × unit costs based on Medicare national allowable payment amounts) and indirect costs (missed workdays × average US daily wage) were recorded. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Perioperative safety, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation rates were similar between groups. Both groups experienced significant improvements in all patient-reported outcome measures at 3 months that was maintained at 12 months. The ACDF cohort had a significantly higher preoperative Neck Disability Index and a significantly greater improvement in health-state utility (ie, quality-adjusted life-years gained) at 12 months. ACDF was associated with significantly higher total costs at 1 year for both Medicare ($11 744) and privately insured ($21 228) patients. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ACDF was $184 654 and $333 774 for Medicare and privately insured patients, respectively, reflecting poor cost-utility. CONCLUSION: Single-level ACDF may not be cost-effective in comparison with PCF for surgical management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy.


Assuntos
Foraminotomia , Radiculopatia , Fusão Vertebral , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Medicare , Discotomia , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 39(1): 47-57, 2023 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964725

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Workers' compensation (WC) and litigation have been shown to adversely impact prognoses in a vast range of health conditions. Low-back pain is currently the most frequent reason for WC claims. The objective of this study was to conduct the largest propensity-matched comparison of outcomes between patients with WC and non-WC status who underwent lumbar spinal decompression with and without fusion. METHODS: Complete data sets for patients who underwent 1- to 4-level lumbar spinal fusion or decompression alone were retrospectively retrieved from the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), which included 1-year patient-reported outcomes from more than 200 hospital systems collected from 2012 to 2021. Population demographics, perioperative safety, facility utilization, patient satisfaction, disability, pain, EQ-5D quality of life, and return to work (RTW) rates were compared between cohorts for both subgroups. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 29,652 patients included in the study. Laminectomy was performed in 16,939 with non-WC status and in 615 with WC, whereas fusion was performed in 11,767 with non-WC status and in 331 with WC. WC patients were more frequently male, a minority race, younger, less educated, more frequently a smoker, had a healthier American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and with greater baseline visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (p < 0.001). One-year postoperative improvements in VAS, ODI, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), RTW rates, and satisfaction were all significantly worse for WC versus non-WC patients for both procedures. After adjusting for baseline differences via propensity matching, WC versus non-WC patients continued to demonstrate worse 3- and 12-month VAS and ODI scores, reduced 12-month QALY gain, and delayed RTW after both procedure types. CONCLUSIONS: WC status was associated with significantly greater residual disability and pain postoperatively, a lower quality of life, and delayed RTW. Utilizing resources to identify the negative influences on outcomes for WC patients may be valuable in preoperative optimization and could yield better outcomes in these patients.


Assuntos
Dor Lombar , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Retorno ao Trabalho , Dor Lombar/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
World Neurosurg ; 173: e228-e233, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36787856

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) have become an increasingly attractive setting for spine surgery in recent decades. Although posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) is widely performed in ASCs, there are no studies supporting the safety of this practice. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of microendoscopic (MED)-PCF in a large cohort of patients at a freestanding ASC. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing MED-PCF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy at a single freestanding ASC from January 2013 to December 2020 were queried. Standard demographic and perioperative data were collected. Outcomes included need for inpatient transfer, perioperative complications, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, and clinical improvement according to the Odom criteria. RESULTS: A total of 1106 patients underwent MED-PCF during the study period. Mean age was 53.3 ± 10.3 years. Most patients underwent decompression at C5-6 (31.4%) or C6-7 (51.9%). Approximately 10% underwent surgery at multiple levels. Mean operative time was 40.0 ± 16.4 minutes. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. All patients were discharged home within a few hours of surgery. The rates of 30-day readmission (0.81%) and reoperation (0.36%) were exceedingly low. Nearly 3 quarters of patients (73.7%) achieved a good or excellent clinical outcome (73.7%) according to the Odom criteria. CONCLUSIONS: MED-PCF can be performed in a freestanding ASC with exceedingly low rates of perioperative complications and short-term readmission or reoperation. Our findings support the ongoing migration of PCF from the hospital to the ambulatory setting. Future studies assessing patient-reported outcomes and long-term reoperation rates are necessary.


Assuntos
Foraminotomia , Radiculopatia , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Estudos de Viabilidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Discotomia
8.
Int J Spine Surg ; 17(2): 258-264, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36635064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is often required to adequately decompress the spinal cord in patients with multilevel cervical spondylosis. Unfortunately, multilevel corpectomy constructs have high rates of early failure and frequently require supplemental posterior fixation. First described in 2003, skip ACCF (sACCF) is defined by corpectomies above and below an intervening vertebral body, which serves as an additional fixation point to augment biomechanical stability. Subsequent studies report high fusion rates and low construct failure rates secondary to superior biomechanical stability. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of sACCF in the largest series published to date. METHODS: This study was a retrospective case series of all patients who underwent sACCF at a single institution over a 10-year period. Standard demographic and perioperative data were collected. Outcome data included immediate postoperative complications, long-term reoperation, and pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent sACCF: 42 at C4-C6 and 3 at C5-C7. Mean age was 57.5 years. More than half (64.4%) of patients were smokers. Almost all patients were discharged home, the vast majority (82.2%) within 3 days of surgery. Five patients (11.1%) developed complications during the index hospitalization: 2 C5 palsies and 3 medical complications. Three patients (6.7%) developed instrumentation failure requiring anterior revision and supplemental posterior fixation. There were statistically significant increases in C1-C7 (47.8 vs 41.1, P < 0.001) and C2-C7 lordosis (11.1 vs 5.0, P < 0.001) on postoperative radiographs compared with preoperative imaging. Average follow-up was 21.1 months. CONCLUSION: sACCF can be performed safely with complication rates similar to those reported for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or adjacent segment ACCF. It should be considered for patients with multilevel cervical pathology for whom an anterior approach is favored. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: sACCF is an effective surgical technique for multilevel cervical decompression and correction of cervical alignment.

9.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 48(3): 155-163, 2023 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36607626

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Assess the cost-utility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) performed in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) versus inpatient hospital setting for Medicare and privately insured patients at one-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Outpatient ACDF has gained popularity due to improved safety and reduced costs. Formal cost-utility studies for ambulatory versus inpatient ACDF are lacking, precluding an accurate assessment of cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6504 patients enrolled in the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) undergoing one-level to two-level ACDF at a single ASC (520) or the inpatient hospital setting (5984) were compared. Propensity matching generated 748 patients for analysis (374 per cohort). Demographic data, resource utilization, patient-reported outcome measures, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed. Direct costs (1-year resource use×unit costs based on Medicare national allowable payment amounts) and indirect costs (missed workdays×average US daily wage) were recorded. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Complication rates and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures and QALYs were similar between groups. Ambulatory ACDF was associated with significantly lower total costs at 1 year for Medicare ($5879.46) and privately insured ($12,873.97) patients, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for inpatient ACDF was $3,674,662 and $8,046,231 for Medicare and privately insured patients, respectively, reflecting unacceptably poor cost-utility. CONCLUSION: Inpatient ACDF is associated with significant increases in total costs compared to the ASC setting without a safety, outcome, or QALY benefit. The ASC setting is a dominant option from a health economy perspective for first-time one-l to two-level ACDF in select patients compared to the inpatient hospital setting.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Medicare , Discotomia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
World Neurosurg ; 171: e471-e477, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36526224

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary approach to surgical care that aims to improve outcomes and reduce costs. Its application to spine surgery has been increasing in recent years, with a notable focus on lumbar fusion. This study describes the development, implementation, and outcomes of the first ERAS pathway for ambulatory spine surgery and the largest ambulatory minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) series to date. METHODS: A comprehensive protocol for ambulatory lumbar fusion is described, including patient selection criteria, a multimodal analgesia regimen, and discharge assessment. Consecutive patients undergoing 1- or 2-level MIS TLIF using the described protocol at a single ambulatory surgery center (ASC) over a five-year period were queried. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients underwent ambulatory MIS TLIF over the study period. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. All but one patient (99.5%) were discharged home from the ASC. Almost three-quarters (71.2%) were discharged on the day of surgery. Thirty- and 90-day readmission rates were 1.4% and 2.8%, respectively. Only one readmission (0.5%) was for intractable back pain. There were no reoperations or mortalities within 90 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MIS TLIF can be performed safely in a freestanding ambulatory surgery center with minimal perioperative and short-term morbidity. The addition of comprehensive ERAS protocols to the ambulatory setting can promote the transition of fusion procedures to this lower cost environment in an effort to provide higher value care.


Assuntos
Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
World Neurosurg ; 170: e436-e440, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36379362

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation is an effective treatment modality for chronic pain. Although percutaneous leads are commonly placed in the outpatient setting, paddle leads are typically implanted in the inpatient setting. Given the substantial cost savings associated with the ambulatory setting, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of thoracic paddle lead implantation in a freestanding ambulatory surgery center (ASC). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing thoracic paddle lead implantation at a single freestanding ASC from January 2015 to December 2020 were queried. Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data were collected. Primary outcomes were incidence of intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications and need for inpatient transfer. Secondary outcomes included readmission at 30 and 90 days and reoperation at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients underwent ambulatory thoracic paddle lead implantation over the study period. Two patients (4.3%) suffered an immediate postoperative complication requiring return to surgery at the ASC-one for an epidural hematoma, and one for a flank hematoma. All but one patient (97.8%) were discharged home on the day of surgery. The overall 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 4.3% and 6.5%, respectively. One patient (2.2%) required reoperation for a mechanical complication. No device-related infections were noted during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic laminotomy for paddle lead spinal cord stimulator implantation can be performed in a freestanding ASC with complication rates comparable to the hospital setting. Future comparative studies that assess clinical outcomes and cost are necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness of the ambulatory setting.


Assuntos
Hematoma Epidural Espinal , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos , Hematoma Epidural Espinal/etiologia , Medula Espinal/cirurgia
12.
J Clin Neurosci ; 61: 28-35, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30487055

RESUMO

Sport-related concussion (SRC) has emerged as a major public health problem. The results of brain imaging studies following SRC have raised questions about long-term neurologic health, but the clinical implications of these findings remain unknown. A systematic review of brain imaging findings after SRC was performed utilizing the following inclusion criteria: football players, brain imaging within 6 months of SRC, and sample size >5. Studies were assessed for: 1) methodology, 2) imaging outcomes, and 3) number of positive statistical comparisons. Imaging was classified as immediate (≤1 week post-injury) or subacute (>1 week to 6 months post-injury). Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Eight of the 11 studies conducted a total of 809 comparisons of brain function, of which 149 (18%) were statistically significant. Nine of the 11 studies (82%) reported positive immediate findings, but were more likely to be subject to recall bias (86% vs. 0%) and to lack baseline advanced brain imaging (78% vs. 50%) than negative studies. Only 3 of 9 studies that reported subacute findings (33%) reported positive results, and these positive studies were also more likely to be subject to recall bias (100% vs. 40%) and to lack baseline advanced brain imaging (100% vs. 67%) than negative studies. The results of the study demonstrate the transitory nature of positive imaging findings and methodological limitations that complicate study interpretation. Further research is required to correlate imaging findings with clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Concussão Encefálica/patologia , Futebol Americano/lesões , Adulto , Concussão Encefálica/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neuroimagem , Estados Unidos
13.
World Neurosurg ; 120: e365-e379, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30144599

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lasting neuroimaging changes after participation in American football are an increasing public health concern. The clinical relevance of imaging findings remains unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was performed with the following inclusion criteria: football players, brain imaging ≥2 years from previous concussion or retirement, and sample size ≥5. Studies were assessed for 1) methodology (control selection, type I error, and recall bias), 2) imaging outcomes, and 3) number of significant statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (all cross-sectional studies) met the inclusion criteria. Highest level of play included high school (n = 1), college (n = 3), and professional (n = 12). Thirteen of the 16 studies made a total 456 comparisons of brain activity, of which 171 were statistically significant (38%). Nine of 16 studies (56%) had appropriate controls, and 5 of 16 studies (31%) appropriately accounted for type I error. To obtain player concussion history, all studies (16/16) had recall bias or unclear methodology. Imaging outcome measures included structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (29.2%), diffusion tensor imaging (25%), radioactive tracer uptake on positron emission tomography (16.7%), patterns of connectivity on functional MRI (fMRI) (12.5%), transcranial magnetic stimulation (8.3%), arterial spin labeling MRI (4.2%), and metabolic changes on 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term neuroimaging findings in American football players are heterogeneous in both methodology and findings. Understanding the clinical importance of statistically significant findings is complicated by methodological limitations and study design. Further research is required to correlate imaging findings with clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Futebol Americano/lesões , Viés , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão , Neuroimagem Funcional , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Rememoração Mental , Neuroimagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...